The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of the Staphylococcus aureus Atl AM and GL Murein Hydrolase Activities in Cell Division, Autolysis, and Biofilm Formation
Open accessAbstract
The most prominent murein hydrolase of Staphylococcus aureus, AtlA, is a bifunctional enzyme that undergoes proteolytic cleavage to yield two catalytically active proteins, an amidase (AM) and a glucosaminidase (GL). Although the bifunctional nature of AtlA has long been recognized, most studies have focused on the combined functions of this protein in cell wall metabolism and biofilm development. In this study, we generated mutant derivatives of the clinical S. aureus isolate, UAMS-1, in which one or both of the AM and GL domains of AtlA have been deleted. Examination of these strains revealed that each mutant exhibited growth rates comparable to the parental strain, but showed clumping phenotypes and lysis profiles that were distinct from the parental strain and each other, suggesting distinct roles in cell wall metabolism. Given the known function of autolysis in the release of genomic DNA for use as a biofilm matrix molecule, we also tested the mutants in biofilm assays and found both AM and GL necessary for biofilm development. Furthermore, the use of enzymatically inactive point mutations revealed that both AM and GL must be catalytically active for S. aureus to form a biofilm. The results of this study provide insight into the relative contributions of AM and GL in S. aureus and demonstrate the contribution of Atl-mediated lysis in biofilm development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heilmann, C., Hussain, M., Peters, G., & Götz, F. (1997) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4101774.x · Cited by 700
Cited by
Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
Becker, K., Heilmann, C., & Peters, G. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00109-13 · Cited by 1,628
Methicillin resistance and the biofilm phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus
McCarthy, H., Rudkin, J. K., Black, N. S., Gallagher, L., O'Neill, E., & O'Gara, J. P. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2015.00001 · Cited by 426
Are coagulase-negative staphylococci virulent?
Heilmann, C., Ziebuhr, W., & Becker, K. (2019) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.11.012 · Cited by 298
Kaplan, J. B., Izano, E. A., Gopal, P., Karwacki, M. T., Kim, S., Bose, J. L., Bayles, K. W., & Horswill, A. R. (2012) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00198-12 · Cited by 287
Self-citationPrevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms
Bhattacharya, M., Wozniak, D. J., Stoodley, P., & Hall-Stoodley, L. (2015) · Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · doi:10.1586/14787210.2015.1100533 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Bose, J. L., Lehman, M. K., Fey, P. D., & Bayles, K. W.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-07-31
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e42244
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064463571
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of the Staphylococcus aureus Atl AM and GL Murein Hydrolase Activities in Cell Division, Autolysis, and Biofilm Formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0042244
- The paper
- Bose, J. L., Lehman, M. K., Fey, P. D., & Bayles, K. W. (2012). Contribution of the Staphylococcus aureus Atl AM and GL Murein Hydrolase Activities in Cell Division, Autolysis, and Biofilm Formation. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.