The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Simple, Low-Cost Conductive Composite Material for 3D Printing of Electronic Sensors
Open accessAbstract
3D printing technology can produce complex objects directly from computer aided digital designs. The technology has traditionally been used by large companies to produce fit and form concept prototypes ('rapid prototyping') before production. In recent years however there has been a move to adopt the technology as full-scale manufacturing solution. The advent of low-cost, desktop 3D printers such as the RepRap and Fab@Home has meant a wider user base are now able to have access to desktop manufacturing platforms enabling them to produce highly customised products for personal use and sale. This uptake in usage has been coupled with a demand for printing technology and materials able to print functional elements such as electronic sensors. Here we present formulation of a simple conductive thermoplastic composite we term 'carbomorph' and demonstrate how it can be used in an unmodified low-cost 3D printer to print electronic sensors able to sense mechanical flexing and capacitance changes. We show how this capability can be used to produce custom sensing devices and user interface devices along with printed objects with embedded sensing capability. This advance in low-cost 3D printing with offer a new paradigm in the 3D printing field with printed sensors and electronics embedded inside 3D printed objects in a single build process without requiring complex or expensive materials incorporating additives such as carbon nanotubes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jakus, A. E., Secor, E. B., Rutz, A. L., Jordan, S. W., Hersam, M. C., & Shah, R. N. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b01179 · Cited by 710
Design, fabrication and control of origami robots
Rus, D., & Tolley, M. T. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0009-8 · Cited by 641
Gnanasekaran, K., Heijmans, T., van Bennekom, S., Woldhuis, H., Wijnia, S., de With, G., & Friedrich, H. (2017) · Applied Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.003 · Cited by 594
Lee, H., & Cho, D.-W. (2016) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc00450d · Cited by 363
3D bioprinted functional and contractile cardiac tissue constructs
Wang, Z., Lee, S. J., Cheng, H.-J., Yoo, J. J., & Atala, A. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.007 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Leigh, S. J., Bradley, R. J., Purssell, C. P., Billson, D. R., & Hutchins, D. A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-11-21
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e49365
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012606450
- Cited by
- 787
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Simple, Low-Cost Conductive Composite Material for 3D Printing of Electronic Sensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0049365
- The paper
- Leigh, S. J., Bradley, R. J., Purssell, C. P., Billson, D. R., & Hutchins, D. A. (2012). A Simple, Low-Cost Conductive Composite Material for 3D Printing of Electronic Sensors. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.