CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 168scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Writing and PublishingAcademic Publishing and Open Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals

Open access
Falagas, Matthew E., Zarkali, Angeliki, Karageorgopoulos, Drosos E., Bardakas, Vangelis, Mavros, Michael N.·2013·PLoS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049476PMC PMC3566179
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of citations received is considered an index of study quality and impact. We aimed to examine the factors associated with the number of citations of published articles, focusing on the article length. METHODS: Original human studies published in the first trimester of 2006 in 5 major General Medicine journals were analyzed with regard to the number of authors and of author-affiliated institutions, title and abstract word count, article length (number of print pages), number of bibliographic references, study design, and 2006 journal impact factor (JIF). A multiple linear regression model was employed to identify the variables independently associated with the number of article citations received through January 2012. RESULTS: On univariate analysis the JIF, number of authors, article length, study design (interventional/observational and prospective/retrospective), title and abstract word count, number of author-affiliated institutions, and number of references were all associated with the number of citations received. On multivariate analysis with the logarithm of citations as the dependent variable, only article length [regression coefficient: 14.64 (95% confidence intervals: (5.76-23.50)] and JIF [3.37 (1.80-4.948)] independently predicted the number of citations. The variance of citations explained by these parameters was 51.2%. CONCLUSION: In a sample of articles published in major General Medicine journals, in addition to journal impact factors, article length and number of authors independently predicted the number of citations. This may reflect a higher complexity level and quality of longer and multi-authored studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0049476

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Correlation between the article length (number of print pages) and future article citations. Results from the multivariate regression analysis. The dots represent the individual pairs for the X–Y variables; the straight line is the linear regression line; the dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval for the regression line. The different journals with their individual IF are shown in different colours.
Figure 1 Correlation between the article length (number of print pages) and future article citations. Results from the multivariate regression analysis. The dots represent the individual pairs for the X–Y variables; the straight line is the linear regression line; the dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval for the regression line. The different journals with their individual IF are shown in different colours.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Correlation between the impact factor of the journal of publication and future article citations. Results from the multivariate regression analysis. The dots represent the individual pairs for the X–Y variables; the straight line is the linear regression line; the dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval for the regression line.
Figure 2 Correlation between the impact factor of the journal of publication and future article citations. Results from the multivariate regression analysis. The dots represent the individual pairs for the X–Y variables; the straight line is the linear regression line; the dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval for the regression line.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Falagas, M. E., Zarkali, A., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., Bardakas, V., & Mavros, M. N.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (GR)
  • Hygeia Hospital (GR)
  • National Technical University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Falagas, Matthew E.
ORCID
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2013-02-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
e49476
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0049476
PMC
PMC3566179
OpenAlex
W2059156680
Cited by
168
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
article length, citation impact, journal impact factor, number of authors, bibliographic references, research design, general medicine journals, research quality indicators
MeSH terms
Equipment Design, Humans, Publishing, Research, Bibliometrics, Journal Impact Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review