Cited by 7Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

Alterations in EGFR and related genes following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Open access
Wang, Shuhang, An, Tongtong, Duan, Jianchun, Zhang, Lijian, Wu, Meina, Zhou, Qinghua, Chen, Jinfeng, Zhuo, Minglei +4 more·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Genetic aberrancies within epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway are associated with therapeutic outcomes of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impact of chemotherapy on EGFR-related genes alterations has not been defined in NSCLC. Our study aims to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Neoadj-Chemo) on EGFR activating mutations and associated EGFR-TKIs resistance-related genes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Matched tumor samples were obtained retrospectively from 66 NSCLC patients (stages IIb-IIIb) corresponding to pre- and post- Neoadj-Chemo. EGFR mutations were detected by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and confirmed by Amplification Refractory Mutation System technology (ARMS), KRAS mutations, T790M mutation and c-MET amplification were identified using Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), ARMS, and real-time PCR, respectively. RESULTS: Before Neoadj-Chemo, EGFR mutations were identified in 33.3% (22/66) of NSCLC patients. Only 18.2% (12/66) of patients carried EGFR mutations after Neoadj-Chemo (p = 0.013). The median peak value of EGFR 19 exon mutations decreased non-significantly after Neoadj-Chemo. KRAS mutation rate decreased from 4.6% (3/66) to 3.0% (2/66) with Neoadj-Chemo. Although the overall percentage of patients exhibiting c-MET amplifications (6.1% [4/66]) did not change with Neoadj-Chemo, two patients transitioned from negative to positive c-MET amplification, and two patients reversed these changes post-Neoadj-Chemo. T790M mutations were absent from all samples. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy tends to decrease the mutation frequency of EGFR mutation and downstream genes, which suggests that real-time samples analysis for genetic aberrancies within EGFR pathways have important value to delineate specific patient populations and facilitate individualized treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0051021

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chemotherapy may selectively kill and inhibit mutant clones within the tumor, whereas wild type clones may proliferate, altering the relative proportion of EGFR-mutated/EGFR-wild type cells within the tumor mass.

    “Chemotherapy may selectively kill and inhibit mutant clones within the tumor, whereas wild type clones may proliferate, altering the relative proportion of EGFR-mutated/EGFR-wild type cells within the tumor mass.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Duan JC, An TT, Wu MN, Yang L, Bai H, et al (2012) Correspondence analysis on EGFR-TKIs′ effect and EGFR mutation in advanced squamous cell lung cancer, Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and R. 35: 323– 8. 22883988

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S., An, T., Duan, J., Zhang, L., Wu, M., Zhou, Q., Chen, J., Zhuo, M., Yang, L., Wang, Y., Bai, H., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
  • Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Bai, Hua
  • Wang, Jie
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-03-08
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
e51021
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019582655
Cited by
7
References
36
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Keywords
non-small cell lung cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, EGFR mutation, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, EGFR signaling, KRAS mutation, MET amplification, T790M mutation, Chinese patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), ras Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Mutation Rate, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review