The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Variability of the 16S rRNA Gene in Bacterial Genomes and Its Consequences for Bacterial Community Analyses
Open accessAbstract
16S ribosomal RNA currently represents the most important target of study in bacterial ecology. Its use for the description of bacterial diversity is, however, limited by the presence of variable copy numbers in bacterial genomes and sequence variation within closely related taxa or within a genome. Here we use the information from sequenced bacterial genomes to explore the variability of 16S rRNA sequences and copy numbers at various taxonomic levels and apply it to estimate bacterial genome and DNA abundances. In total, 7,081 16S rRNA sequences were in silico extracted from 1,690 available bacterial genomes (1-15 per genome). While there are several phyla containing low 16S rRNA copy numbers, in certain taxa, e.g., the Firmicutes and Gammaproteobacteria, the variation is large. Genome sizes are more conserved at all tested taxonomic levels than 16S rRNA copy numbers. Only a minority of bacterial genomes harbors identical 16S rRNA gene copies, and sequence diversity increases with increasing copy numbers. While certain taxa harbor dissimilar 16S rRNA genes, others contain sequences common to multiple species. Sequence identity clusters (often termed operational taxonomic units) thus provide an imperfect representation of bacterial taxa of a certain phylogenetic rank. We have demonstrated that the information on 16S rRNA copy numbers and genome sizes of genome-sequenced bacteria may be used as an estimate for the closest related taxon in an environmental dataset to calculate alternative estimates of the relative abundance of individual bacterial taxa in environmental samples. Using an example from forest soil, this procedure would increase the abundance estimates of Acidobacteria and decrease these of Firmicutes. Using the currently available information, alternative estimates of bacterial community composition may be obtained in this way if the variation of 16S rRNA copy numbers among bacteria is considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121 · Cited by 39,969
Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST
Edgar, R. C. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 · Cited by 20,826
Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences
Li, W., & Godzik, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · Cited by 11,410
STACKEBRANDT, E., & GOEBEL, B. M. (1994) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-44-4-846 · Cited by 7,083
Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00335-09 · Cited by 4,063
Impact of Culture-Independent Studies on the Emerging Phylogenetic View of Bacterial Diversity
Hugenholtz, P., Goebel, B. M., & Pace, N. R. (1998) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.180.18.4765-4774.1998 · Cited by 2,428
How Close Is Close: 16S rRNA Sequence Identity May Not Be Sufficient To Guarantee Species Identity
Fox, G. E., Wisotzkey, J. D., & Jurtshuk, P. (1992) · International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology · doi:10.1099/00207713-42-1-166 · Cited by 1,300
rRNA Operon Copy Number Reflects Ecological Strategies of Bacteria
Klappenbach, J. A., Dunbar, J. M., & Schmidt, T. M. (2000) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.66.4.1328-1333.2000 · Cited by 1,133
Dowd, S. E., Callaway, T. R., Wolcott, R. D., Sun, Y., McKeehan, T., Hagevoort, R. G., & Edrington, T. S. (2008) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-8-125 · Cited by 1,121
Cited by
Characterization of the gut microbiome using 16S or shotgun metagenomics
Jovel, J., Patterson, J., Wang, W., Hotte, N., O'Keefe, S., Mitchel, T., Perry, T., Kao, D., Mason, A. L., Madsen, K. L., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00459 · Cited by 942
A new view of the fish gut microbiome: advances from next-generation sequencing
Ghanbari, M., Kneifel, W., & Domig, K. J. (2015) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.033 · Cited by 669
The Madness of Microbiome: Attempting To Find Consensus “Best Practice” for 16S Microbiome Studies
Pollock, J., Glendinning, L., Wisedchanwet, T., & Watson, M. (2018) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02627-17 · Cited by 575
The role of the gut microbiome in the healthy adult status
D’Argenio, V., & Salvatore, F. (2015) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2015.01.003 · Cited by 492
A phylogenetic transform enhances analysis of compositional microbiota data
Silverman, J. D., Washburne, A. D., Mukherjee, S., & David, L. A. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.21887 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Větrovský, T., & Baldrian, P.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-02-27
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e57923
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054385769
- Cited by
- 1,208
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 54.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Variability of the 16S rRNA Gene in Bacterial Genomes and Its Consequences for Bacterial Community Analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0057923
- The paper
- Větrovský, T., & Baldrian, P. (2013). The Variability of the 16S rRNA Gene in Bacterial Genomes and Its Consequences for Bacterial Community Analyses. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057923
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.