Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A phylogenetic transform enhances analysis of compositional microbiota data

Open access
Silverman, Justin D, Washburne, Alex D, Mukherjee, Sayan, David, Lawrence A·2017·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Surveys of microbial communities (microbiota), typically measured as relative abundance of species, have illustrated the importance of these communities in human health and disease. Yet, statistical artifacts commonly plague the analysis of relative abundance data. Here, we introduce the PhILR transform, which incorporates microbial evolutionary models with the isometric log-ratio transform to allow off-the-shelf statistical tools to be safely applied to microbiota surveys. We demonstrate that analyses of community-level structure can be applied to PhILR transformed data with performance on benchmarks rivaling or surpassing standard tools. Additionally, by decomposing distance in the PhILR transformed space, we identified neighboring clades that may have adapted to distinct human body sites. Decomposing variance revealed that covariation of bacterial clades within human body sites increases with phylogenetic relatedness. Together, these findings illustrate how the PhILR transform combines statistical and phylogenetic models to overcome compositional data challenges and enable evolutionary insights relevant to microbial communities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.21887

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 96 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bacon-Shone, 2011, Compositional Data Analysis, 1
  2. Lovell, 2011, Compositional Data Analysis: Theory and Applications, 193
  3. Purdom, 2011, Analysis of a data matrix and a graph: metagenomic data and the phylogenetic tree, The Annals of Applied Statistics, 5, 2326, 10.1214/10-AOAS402 · doi:10.1214/10-aoas402

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Silverman, J. D., Washburne, A. D., Mukherjee, S., & David, L. A.
Venue
eLife
Published
2017-02-15
Volume
6
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2510675082
Cited by
319
References
96
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (IIS 1546331, IIS 1418261)
  • Global Probiotics Council (Young Investigator Grant for Probiotics Research)
  • Searle Scholars Program (15-SSP-184 Research Agreement)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (BR2014-003)
  • Duke University (Medical Scientist Training Program GM007171)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A phylogenetic transform enhances analysis of compositional microbiota data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7554/elife.21887
The paper
Silverman, J. D., Washburne, A. D., Mukherjee, S., & David, L. A. (2017). A phylogenetic transform enhances analysis of compositional microbiota data. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.21887

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.