Cited by 31Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

Structure and Non-Structure of Centrosomal Proteins

Open access
Dos Santos, Helena G., Abia, David, Janowski, Robert, Mortuza, Gulnahar, Bertero, Michela G., Boutin, Maïlys, Guarín, Nayibe, Méndez-Giraldez, Raúl +17 more·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Here we perform a large-scale study of the structural properties and the expression of proteins that constitute the human Centrosome. Centrosomal proteins tend to be larger than generic human proteins (control set), since their genes contain in average more exons (20.3 versus 14.6). They are rich in predicted disordered regions, which cover 57% of their length, compared to 39% in the general human proteome. They also contain several regions that are dually predicted to be disordered and coiled-coil at the same time: 55 proteins (15%) contain disordered and coiled-coil fragments that cover more than 20% of their length. Helices prevail over strands in regions homologous to known structures (47% predicted helical residues against 17% predicted as strands), and even more in the whole centrosomal proteome (52% against 7%), while for control human proteins 34.5% of the residues are predicted as helical and 12.8% are predicted as strands. This difference is mainly due to residues predicted as disordered and helical (30% in centrosomal and 9.4% in control proteins), which may correspond to alpha-helix forming molecular recognition features (α-MoRFs). We performed expression assays for 120 full-length centrosomal proteins and 72 domain constructs that we have predicted to be globular. These full-length proteins are often insoluble: Only 39 out of 120 expressed proteins (32%) and 19 out of 72 domains (26%) were soluble. We built or retrieved structural models for 277 out of 361 human proteins whose centrosomal localization has been experimentally verified. We could not find any suitable structural template with more than 20% sequence identity for 84 centrosomal proteins (23%), for which around 74% of the residues are predicted to be disordered or coiled-coils. The three-dimensional models that we built are available at http://ub.cbm.uam.es/centrosome/models/index.php.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0062633

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [53]Newman MEJ (2010) Networks: An Introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Authors
Dos Santos, H. G., Abia, D., Janowski, R., Mortuza, G., Bertero, M. G., Boutin, M., Guarín, N., Méndez-Giraldez, R., Nuñez, A., Pedrero, J. G., Redondo, P., Sanz, M., Speroni, S., Teichert, F., Bruix, M., Carazo, J. M., Gonzalez, C., Reina, J., Valpuesta, J. M., Vernos, I., Zabala, J. C., Montoya, G., Coll, M., Bastolla, U., & Serrano, L.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Institute for Research in Biomedicine (ES)
  • Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (ES)
  • Centre for Genomic Regulation (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
  • Universidad de Cantabria (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Bastolla, Ugo
  • Serrano, Luis
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-05-09
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
e62633
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089316140
Cited by
31
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCrea (University of Cantabria) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
centrosome, centrosomal proteins, intrinsically disordered regions, coiled-coil domain, protein structure prediction, protein solubility, protein expression, exon number, alpha-helix content, structural model
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Binding, Proteins, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Protein Folding, Centrosome, Protein Isoforms, Proteome, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review