Cited by 41Human-Animal Interaction StudiesSocial Robot Interaction and HRIChild and Animal Learning Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Are You or Who Are You? The Emergence of Social Interaction between Dog and an Unidentified Moving Object (UMO)

Open access

Abstract

Robots offer new possibilities for investigating animal social behaviour. This method enhances controllability and reproducibility of experimental techniques, and it allows also the experimental separation of the effects of bodily appearance (embodiment) and behaviour. In the present study we examined dogs' interactive behaviour in a problem solving task (in which the dog has no access to the food) with three different social partners, two of which were robots and the third a human behaving in a robot-like manner. The Mechanical UMO (Unidentified Moving Object) and the Mechanical Human differed only in their embodiment, but showed similar behaviour toward the dog. In contrast, the Social UMO was interactive, showed contingent responsiveness and goal-directed behaviour and moved along varied routes. The dogs showed shorter looking and touching duration, but increased gaze alternation toward the Mechanical Human than to the Mechanical UMO. This suggests that dogs' interactive behaviour may have been affected by previous experience with typical humans. We found that dogs also looked longer and showed more gaze alternations between the food and the Social UMO compared to the Mechanical UMO. These results suggest that dogs form expectations about an unfamiliar moving object within a short period of time and they recognise some social aspects of UMOs' behaviour. This is the first evidence that interactive behaviour of a robot is important for evoking dogs' social responsiveness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0072727

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In experimental contexts, dogs appear to attribute animacy to objects that behave in seemingly agentive ways.

    “Corroborating Darwin’s report, in experimental contexts, dogs appear to attribute animacy to objects that behave in seemingly agentive ways [87].”

    From The social origins of consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [87]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. D Lack, 1943, Notes on territory, fighting and display in the Chaffinch, British Birds, 34, 216
  2. G Kramer, 1937, Beobachtungenii ber Paarungsbiologieu nd soziales Verhalten von Mauereidechsen. Zeitschr. Morphol. Ökol, Tiere, 32, 752

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gergely, A., Petró, E., Topál, J., & Miklósi, Á.
Affiliations
  • Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
  • Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology (HU)
Corresponding author
Gergely, Anna
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-08-28
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
e72727
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107997129
Cited by
38
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ELTE Digital Institutional Repository (EDIT) (Eötvös Loránd University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (133059)
  • Hungarian Scientific Research Fund
  • Hungarian Science Foundation (K-100695)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
dogs, social interaction, embodiment, gaze alternation, social responsiveness, problem solving, goal-directed behavior, human-robot interaction, animal social behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Dogs, Humans, Robotics, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review