Cited by 117Alcohol Consumption and Health EffectsLiver physiology and pathologyLiver Disease and Transplantation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.

Hepatocyte Expression of the Senescence Marker p21 Is Linked to Fibrosis and an Adverse Liver-Related Outcome in Alcohol-Related Liver Disease

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) remains a leading cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Age, fibrosis stage, MELD score and continued alcohol consumption predict outcome in everyday clinical practice. In previous studies increased hepatocyte nuclear area and hepatocyte expression of p21, both markers of senescence, were associated with increased fibrosis stage and a poor outcome in non-alcohol-related fatty liver disease, while increased hepatocyte nuclear area was related to liver dysfunction in ALD cirrhosis. This study, therefore, investigated the pattern of hepatocyte cell cycle phase distribution and hepatocyte p21 expression in relation to outcome in ALD. METHODS: Liver sections from two cohorts were studied. The first comprised 42 patients across the full spectrum of ALD. The second cohort comprised 77 patients with ALD cirrhosis. Immunohistochemistry assessed hepatocyte expression of cell cycle phase markers and p21. Regenerating liver (n=12) and "normal" liver sections (n=5) served as positive and negative controls, respectively. RESULTS: In the first cohort there was little cell cycle progression beyond G1/S phase and increased hepatocyte p21 expression (p<0.0001), which correlated independently with fibrosis stage (p=0.005) and an adverse liver-related outcome (p=0.03). In the second cohort, both hepatocyte p21 expression (p<0.001) and MELD score (p=0.006) were associated independently with an adverse liver-related outcome; this association was stronger with hepatocyte p21 expression (AUROC 0.74; p=0.0002) than with MELD score (AUROC 0.59; p=0.13). Further, hepatocyte p21 expression co-localised with increased hepatic stellate cell activation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings are consistent with impaired cell cycle progression beyond the G1/S phase in ALD. The striking independent associations between increased hepatocyte p21 expression and both fibrosis stage and an adverse liver-related outcome in both cohorts suggests hepatocyte senescence plays an important role in ALD. Measuring hepatocyte p21 expression is simple and cheap and in this series was a useful measure of long-term prognosis in ALD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0072904

Cites

20 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 The distribution of cell cycle phase markers in the first cohort and controls. Examples of the immunohistochemical staining of Mcm-2, cyclin A, PH3 and p21 in regenerating liver (positive control tissue), liver from a representative patient with ALD and normal liver (negative control tissue). Hepatocyte Mcm-2 expression was higher in ALD and regenerating liver (positive control) compared to normal liver (negative control). Cyclin A and PH3 expression were lower in ALD compared to regenerating liver. In contrast hepatocyte p21 expression was higher in ALD compared to regenerating liver.
Figure 1 The distribution of cell cycle phase markers in the first cohort and controls. Examples of the immunohistochemical staining of Mcm-2, cyclin A, PH3 and p21 in regenerating liver (positive control tissue), liver from a representative patient with ALD and normal liver (negative control tissue). Hepatocyte Mcm-2 expression was higher in ALD and regenerating liver (positive control) compared to normal liver (negative control). Cyclin A and PH3 expression were lower in ALD compared to regenerating liver. In contrast hepatocyte p21 expression was higher in ALD compared to regenerating liver.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Hepatocyte p21 expression in relation to fibrosis stage and laboratory indices. Hepatocyte p21 expression demonstrated an association with fibrosis stage [2a] in the first cohort; the proportion of hepatocytes that expressed p21 increased with increasing fibrosis stage. Areas of increased α-SMA expression (a marker of activated hepatic stellate cells) were associated with higher hepatocyte p21 expression (2b) than those areas with less α-SMA expression, which were associated with lower hepatocyte p21 expression (2c) even within the same tissue. Expression of hepatocyte p21 correlated positively with prothrombin time in both cohorts (Figure 2d & 2e, respectively) and correlated negatively with serum albumin in the second cohort (Figure 2f).
Figure 2 Hepatocyte p21 expression in relation to fibrosis stage and laboratory indices. Hepatocyte p21 expression demonstrated an association with fibrosis stage [2a] in the first cohort; the proportion of hepatocytes that expressed p21 increased with increasing fibrosis stage. Areas of increased α-SMA expression (a marker of activated hepatic stellate cells) were associated with higher hepatocyte p21 expression (2b) than those areas with less α-SMA expression, which were associated with lower hepatocyte p21 expression (2c) even within the same tissue. Expression of hepatocyte p21 correlated positively with prothrombin time in both cohorts (Figure 2d & 2e, respectively) and correlated negatively with serum albumin in the second cohort (Figure 2f).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Differential hepatocyte p21 expression in the second cohort. Figure 3 shows fibrosis using reticulin staining (above) and hepatocyte p21 expression (below) in a patient with ALD cirrhosis in second cohort.
Figure 3 Differential hepatocyte p21 expression in the second cohort. Figure 3 shows fibrosis using reticulin staining (above) and hepatocyte p21 expression (below) in a patient with ALD cirrhosis in second cohort.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Hepatocyte p21 expression, MELD score and alcohol consumption at the time of liver biopsy in relation to an adverse liver-related outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis in 42 patients in the first cohort, divided according to hepatocyte p21 expression above the median [red line] or below the median [black line]) from the time of liver biopsy to outcome or censor point by log-rank test (p=0.03) [4a]. Kaplan-Meier analysis of 77 patients in the second cohort from the time of liver biopsy to outcome or censor point by log-rank test - divided according to p21 expression above the median [red line] or below the median [black line] (p<0.0001) [4b]; MELD score above the median [red line] or MELD score below the median [black line] (p=0.03) [4c]; alcohol consumption above the median [red line] or alcohol consumption below the median [black line] (p=0.03) [4d].
Figure 4 Hepatocyte p21 expression, MELD score and alcohol consumption at the time of liver biopsy in relation to an adverse liver-related outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis in 42 patients in the first cohort, divided according to hepatocyte p21 expression above the median [red line] or below the median [black line]) from the time of liver biopsy to outcome or censor point by log-rank test (p=0.03) [4a]. Kaplan-Meier analysis of 77 patients in the second cohort from the time of liver biopsy to outcome or censor point by log-rank test - divided according to p21 expression above the median [red line] or below the median [black line] (p<0.0001) [4b]; MELD score above the median [red line] or MELD score below the median [black line] (p=0.03) [4c]; alcohol consumption above the median [red line] or alcohol consumption below the median [black line] (p=0.03) [4d].CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 ROC curves comparing hepatocyte p21 expression alone, MELD score alone and hepatocyte p21 expression plus MELD score in predicting an adverse liver related outcome in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for hepatocyte p21 expression alone (0.74), MELD score alone (0.59) and hepatocyte p21 plus MELD score (0.76) are shown
Figure 5 ROC curves comparing hepatocyte p21 expression alone, MELD score alone and hepatocyte p21 expression plus MELD score in predicting an adverse liver related outcome in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for hepatocyte p21 expression alone (0.74), MELD score alone (0.59) and hepatocyte p21 plus MELD score (0.76) are shownCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 117

Metadata

Authors
Aravinthan, A., Pietrosi, G., Hoare, M., Jupp, J., Marshall, A., Verrill, C., Davies, S., Bateman, A., Sheron, N., Allison, M., & Alexander, G. J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Alexander, Graeme J. M.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-09-23
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
e72904
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026914673
Cited by
117
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
Keywords
alcoholic liver disease, hepatocyte senescence, p21, liver fibrosis, hepatocyte cell cycle, G1/S phase, MELD score, hepatic stellate cell activation, liver cirrhosis, prognosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Biopsy, Female, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Diseases, Alcoholic, Male, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Cellular Senescence, Hepatocytes, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review