The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Global Seasonality of Norovirus
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Noroviruses are the most common cause of acute gastroenteritis across all ages worldwide. These pathogens are generally understood to exhibit a wintertime seasonality, though a systematic assessment of seasonal patterns has not been conducted in the era of modern diagnostics. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the Pubmed Medline database for articles published between 1997 and 2011 to identify and extract data from articles reporting on monthly counts of norovirus. We conducted a descriptive analysis to document seasonal patterns of norovirus disease, and we also constructed multivariate linear models to identify factors associated with the strength of norovirus seasonality. RESULTS: The searched identified 293 unique articles, yielding 38 case and 29 outbreak data series. Within these data series, 52.7% of cases and 41.2% of outbreaks occurred in winter months, and 78.9% of cases and 71.0% of outbreaks occurred in cool months. Both case and outbreak studies showed an earlier peak in season-year 2002-03, but not in season-year 2006-07, years when new genogroup II type 4 variants emerged. For outbreaks, norovirus season strength was positively associated with average rainfall in the wettest month, and inversely associated with crude birth rate in both bivariate and multivariate analyses. For cases, none of the covariates examined was associated with season strength. When case and outbreaks were combined, average rainfall in the wettest month was positively associated with season strength. CONCLUSIONS: Norovirus is a wintertime phenomenon, at least in the temperate northern hemisphere where most data are available. Our results point to possible associations of season strength with rain in the wettest month and crude birth rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens
Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R. M., Angulo, F. J., Tauxe, R. V., Widdowson, M.-A., Roy, S. L., Jones, J. L., & Griffin, P. M. (2011) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1701.p11101 · Cited by 7,657
The dynamics of norovirus outbreak epidemics: Recent insights
Marshall, J. A., & Bruggink, L. D. (2011) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph8041141 · Cited by 88
Cited by
Platts-Mills, J. A., Babji, S., Bodhidatta, L., Gratz, J., Haque, R., Havt, A., McCormick, B. J., McGrath, M., Olortegui, M. P., Samie, A., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(15)00151-5 · Cited by 894
Bányai, K., Estes, M. K., Martella, V., & Parashar, U. D. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31128-0 · Cited by 445
Kraay, A. N. M., Han, P., Kambhampati, A. K., Wikswo, M. E., Mirza, S. A., & Lopman, B. A. (2021) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiab093 · Cited by 76
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmed, S. M., Lopman, B. A., & Levy, K.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-10-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e75922
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084993967
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Global Seasonality of Norovirus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0075922
- The paper
- Ahmed, S. M., Lopman, B. A., & Levy, K. (2013). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Global Seasonality of Norovirus. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.