The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Weed Mapping in Early-Season Maize Fields Using Object-Based Analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Images
Open accessAbstract
The use of remote imagery captured by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) has tremendous potential for designing detailed site-specific weed control treatments in early post-emergence, which have not possible previously with conventional airborne or satellite images. A robust and entirely automatic object-based image analysis (OBIA) procedure was developed on a series of UAV images using a six-band multispectral camera (visible and near-infrared range) with the ultimate objective of generating a weed map in an experimental maize field in Spain. The OBIA procedure combines several contextual, hierarchical and object-based features and consists of three consecutive phases: 1) classification of crop rows by application of a dynamic and auto-adaptive classification approach, 2) discrimination of crops and weeds on the basis of their relative positions with reference to the crop rows, and 3) generation of a weed infestation map in a grid structure. The estimation of weed coverage from the image analysis yielded satisfactory results. The relationship of estimated versus observed weed densities had a coefficient of determination of r(2)=0.89 and a root mean square error of 0.02. A map of three categories of weed coverage was produced with 86% of overall accuracy. In the experimental field, the area free of weeds was 23%, and the area with low weed coverage (<5% weeds) was 47%, which indicated a high potential for reducing herbicide application or other weed operations. The OBIA procedure computes multiple data and statistics derived from the classification outputs, which permits calculation of herbicide requirements and estimation of the overall cost of weed management operations in advance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: Survey and challenges
Zhai, Z., Martínez, J. F., Beltran, V., & Martínez, N. L. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105256 · Cited by 872
The digitization of agricultural industry – a systematic literature review on agriculture 4.0
Abbasi, R., Martinez, P., & Ahmad, R. (2022) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2022.100042 · Cited by 531
Multi-temporal mapping of the vegetation fraction in early-season wheat fields using images from UAV
Torres-Sánchez, J., Peña, J. M., de Castro, A. I., & López-Granados, F. (2014) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2014.02.009 · Cited by 473
Self-citationweedNet: Dense Semantic Weed Classification Using Multispectral Images and MAV for Smart Farming
Sa, I., Chen, Z., Popovic, M., Khanna, R., Liebisch, F., Nieto, J., & Siegwart, R. (2018) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2017.2774979 · Cited by 369
Geipel, J., Link, J., & Claupein, W. (2014) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs61110335 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Peña, J. M., Torres-Sánchez, J., de Castro, A. I., Kelly, M., & López-Granados, F.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-10-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e77151
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080091930
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weed Mapping in Early-Season Maize Fields Using Object-Based Analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0077151
- The paper
- Peña, J. M., Torres-Sánchez, J., de Castro, A. I., Kelly, M., & López-Granados, F. (2013). Weed Mapping in Early-Season Maize Fields Using Object-Based Analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Images. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077151
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.