Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome-Wide Association Mapping of Root Traits in a Japonica Rice Panel

Open access
Courtois, Brigitte, Audebert, Alain, Dardou, Audrey, Roques, Sandrine, Ghneim- Herrera, Thaura, Droc, Gaëtan, Frouin, Julien, Rouan, Lauriane, Gozé, Eric, Kilian, Andrzej, Ahmadi, Nourollah, Dingkuhn, Michael·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Rice is a crop prone to drought stress in upland and rainfed lowland ecosystems. A deep root system is recognized as the best drought avoidance mechanism. Genome-wide association mapping offers higher resolution for locating quantitative trait loci (QTLs) than QTL mapping in biparental populations. We performed an association mapping study for root traits using a panel of 167 japonica accessions, mostly of tropical origin. The panel was genotyped at an average density of one marker per 22.5 kb using genotyping by sequencing technology. The linkage disequilibrium in the panel was high (r(2)>0.6, on average, for 20 kb mean distances between markers). The plants were grown in transparent 50 cm × 20 cm × 2 cm Plexiglas nailboard sandwiches filled with 1.5 mm glass beads through which a nutrient solution was circulated. Root system architecture and biomass traits were measured in 30-day-old plants. The panel showed a moderate to high diversity in the various traits, particularly for deep (below 30 cm depth) root mass and the number of deep roots. Association analyses were conducted using a mixed model involving both population structure and kinship to control for false positives. Nineteen associations were significant at P<1e-05, and 78 were significant at P<1e-04. The greatest numbers of significant associations were detected for deep root mass and the number of deep roots, whereas no significant associations were found for total root biomass or deep root proportion. Because several QTLs for different traits were co-localized, 51 unique loci were detected; several co-localized with meta-QTLs for root traits, but none co-localized with rice genes known to be involved in root growth. Several likely candidate genes were found in close proximity to these loci. Additional work is necessary to assess whether these markers are relevant in other backgrounds and whether the genes identified are robust candidates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0078037

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Courtois, B., Audebert, A., Dardou, A., Roques, S., Ghneim- Herrera, T., Droc, G., Frouin, J., Rouan, L., Gozé, E., Kilian, A., Ahmadi, N., & Dingkuhn, M.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-11-05
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
e78037
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064035322
Cited by
306
References
61
FWCI
14.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome-Wide Association Mapping of Root Traits in a Japonica Rice Panel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0078037
The paper
Courtois, B., Audebert, A., Dardou, A., Roques, S., Ghneim- Herrera, T., Droc, G., Frouin, J., Rouan, L., Gozé, E., Kilian, A., Ahmadi, N., & Dingkuhn, M. (2013). Genome-Wide Association Mapping of Root Traits in a Japonica Rice Panel. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078037

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.