The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opportunity or Orientation? Who Uses Urban Parks and Why
Open accessAbstract
There is growing recognition that interactions with nature provide many desirable human well-being outcomes, yet increasing urbanization is degrading the quality and quantity of nature experiences. Thus, it has become increasingly important to understand how and why urban dwellers interact with nature. Studies of urban green space use have largely focused on the availability and ease of access to green space, suggesting that greater opportunities to experience such space will lead to increased use. However, a growing literature emphasizes the potential for an individual's nature orientation to affect their interaction with green space. Here we measure the importance of both opportunity and orientation factors in explaining urban park use. An urban lifestyle survey was deployed across Brisbane, Australia in November 2012 to assess patterns of green space use. Participants (n=1479) were asked to provide information on demographics, private yard use, park visitations in the past week, and their orientation toward nature. About 60% of those surveyed had visited a park in the past week, and while this park user population had significantly greater nearby park coverage (within a 250 m radius; p=0.006), a much stronger determinant of visitation was their higher nature orientation (p<0.00001), suggesting that while both opportunity and orientation are important drivers for park visitation, nature orientation is the primary effect. Park users also spent significantly more time in their yards than non-park users (p<0.00001), suggesting that yard use does not necessarily compensate for lower park use. Park users with stronger nature orientation (i) spent more time in their yard, (ii) traveled further to green spaces, and (iii) made longer visits than park visitors with weaker nature orientation. Overall, our results suggest that measures to increase people's connection to nature could be more important than measures to increase urban green space availability if we want to encourage park visitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What are the benefits of interacting with nature?
Keniger, L., Gaston, K., Irvine, K., & Fuller, R. (2013) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph10030913 · Cited by 1,204 · cited 1×
“Exposure to and interaction with nature have been shown to have a role in physical health, cognitive function, social cohesion, and mental health, with long-lasting psychological benefits [6,7,8,9].”
BackgroundSelf-citationExercise for overweight or obesity
Shaw, K. A., Gennat, H. C., O'Rourke, P., & Del Mar, C. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003817.pub3 · Cited by 950
Exercise for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Thomas, D., Elliott, E. J., & Naughton, G. A. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002968.pub2 · Cited by 728
Physical fitness and activity as separate heart disease risk factors: a meta-analysis
WILLIAMS, P. T. (2001) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200105000-00012 · Cited by 724
FORUM: Sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world's cities?
Lin, B. B., & Fuller, R. A. (2013) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12118 · Cited by 197
Self-citation
Cited by
Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions
Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1225 · Cited by 1,802
Self-citationShifting baseline syndrome: causes, consequences, and implications
Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1794 · Cited by 709
Self-citationReconnecting with nature for sustainability
Ives, C. D., Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Dorninger, C., Klaniecki, K., & Fischer, J. (2018) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0542-9 · Cited by 593
Social-ecological and technological factors moderate the value of urban nature
Keeler, B. L., Hamel, P., McPhearson, T., Hamann, M. H., Donahue, M. L., Meza Prado, K. A., Arkema, K. K., Bratman, G. N., Brauman, K. A., Finlay, J. C., et al. (2019) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0202-1 · Cited by 530
Zylstra, M. J., Knight, A. T., Esler, K. J., & Le Grange, L. L. L. (2014) · Springer Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, B. B., Fuller, R. A., Bush, R., Gaston, K. J., & Shanahan, D. F.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-01-29
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e87422
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110245060
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opportunity or Orientation? Who Uses Urban Parks and Why. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0087422
- The paper
- Lin, B. B., Fuller, R. A., Bush, R., Gaston, K. J., & Shanahan, D. F. (2014). Opportunity or Orientation? Who Uses Urban Parks and Why. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.