The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ColonyArea: An ImageJ Plugin to Automatically Quantify Colony Formation in Clonogenic Assays
Open accessAbstract
The clonogenic or colony formation assay is a widely used method to study the number and size of cancer cell colonies that remain after irradiation or cytotoxic agent administration and serves as a measure for the anti-proliferative effect of these treatments. Alternatively, this assay is used to quantitate the transforming potential of cancer associated genes and chemical agents. Therefore, there is a need for a simplified and standardized analysis of colony formation assays for both routine laboratory use and for parallelized automated analysis. Here we describe the freely available ImageJ-plugin "ColonyArea", which is optimized for rapid and quantitative analysis of focus formation assays conducted in 6- to 24-well dishes. ColonyArea processes image data of multi-well dishes, by separating, concentrically cropping and background correcting well images individually, before colony formation is quantitated. Instead of counting the number of colonies, ColonyArea determines the percentage of area covered by crystal violet stained cell colonies, also taking the intensity of the staining and therefore cell density into account. We demonstrate that these parameters alone or in combination allow for robust quantification of IC50 values of the cytotoxic effect of two staurosporines, UCN-01 and staurosporine (STS) on human glioblastoma cells (T98G). The relation between the potencies of the two compounds compared very well with that obtained from an absorbance based method to quantify colony growth and to published data. The ColonyArea ImageJ plugin provides a simple and efficient analysis routine to quantitate assay data of one of the most commonly used cellular assays. The bundle is freely available for download as supporting information. We expect that ColonyArea will be of broad utility for cancer biologists, as well as clinical radiation scientists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro
Franken, N. A. P., Rodermond, H. M., Stap, J., Haveman, J., & van Bree, C. (2006) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.339 · Cited by 4,188
ACTION OF X-RAYS ON MAMMALIAN CELLS
Puck, T. T., & Marcus, P. I. (1956) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.103.5.653 · Cited by 1,696
Ritz, C., & Streibig, J. C. (2005) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v012.i05 · Cited by 1,438
CellProfiler™: Free, Versatile Software for Automated Biological Image Analysis
Lamprecht, M. R., Sabatini, D. M., & Carpenter, A. E. (2007) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000112257 · Cited by 895
Determination of cell number in monolayer cultures
Gillies, R. J., Didier, N., & Denton, M. (1986) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(86)90314-3 · Cited by 650
Quantification of cells cultured on 96-well plates
Kueng, W., Silber, E., & Eppenberger, U. (1989) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(89)90710-0 · Cited by 634
Takeuchi, H., Kondo, Y., Fujiwara, K., Kanzawa, T., Aoki, H., Mills, G. B., & Kondo, S. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-3640 · Cited by 534
OpenCFU, a New Free and Open-Source Software to Count Cell Colonies and Other Circular Objects
Geissmann, Q. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054072 · Cited by 385
Protein kinase inhibition of clinically important staurosporine analogues
Gani, O. A. B. S. M., & Engh, R. A. (2010) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/b923848b · Cited by 154
Bettger, W. J., Boyce, S. T., Walthall, B. J., & Ham, R. G. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.9.5588 · Cited by 140
Cited by
Accurate and efficient detection of gene fusions from RNA sequencing data
Uhrig, S., Ellermann, J., Walther, T., Burkhardt, P., Fröhlich, M., Hutter, B., Toprak, U. H., Neumann, O., Stenzinger, A., Scholl, C., et al. (2021) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.257246.119 · Cited by 526
SHP2 inhibition prevents adaptive resistance to MEK inhibitors in multiple cancer models
Fedele, C., Ran, H., Diskin, B., Wei, W., Jen, J., Geer, M. J., Araki, K., Ozerdem, U., Simeone, D. M., Miller, G., et al. (2018) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0444 · Cited by 315
SHP2 inhibition diminishes KRASG12C cycling and promotes tumor microenvironment remodeling
Fedele, C., Li, S., Teng, K. W., Foster, C. J. R., Peng, D., Ran, H., Mita, P., Geer, M. J., Hattori, T., Koide, A., et al. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20201414 · Cited by 265
Metabolic requirement for GOT2 in pancreatic cancer depends on environmental context
Kerk, S. A., Lin, L., Myers, A. L., Sutton, D. J., Andren, A., Sajjakulnukit, P., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Jiménez, J. A., Nelson, B. S., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.73245 · Cited by 108
Functional E3 ligase hotspots and resistance mechanisms to small-molecule degraders
Hanzl, A., Casement, R., Imrichova, H., Hughes, S. J., Barone, E., Testa, A., Bauer, S., Wright, J., Brand, M., Ciulli, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-022-01177-2 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Guzmán, C., Bagga, M., Kaur, A., Westermarck, J., & Abankwa, D.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-03-19
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e92444
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964296201
- Cited by
- 717
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 14.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ColonyArea: An ImageJ Plugin to Automatically Quantify Colony Formation in Clonogenic Assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0092444
- The paper
- Guzmán, C., Bagga, M., Kaur, A., Westermarck, J., & Abankwa, D. (2014). ColonyArea: An ImageJ Plugin to Automatically Quantify Colony Formation in Clonogenic Assays. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.