Cited by 81Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

History of Pregnancy Loss Increases the Risk of Mental Health Problems in Subsequent Pregnancies but Not in the Postpartum

Open access
Chojenta, Catherine, Harris, Sheree, Reilly, Nicole, Forder, Peta, Austin, Marie-Paule, Loxton, Deborah·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

While grief, emotional distress and other mental health conditions have been associated with pregnancy loss, less is known about the mental health impact of these events during subsequent pregnancies and births. This paper examined the impact of any type of pregnancy loss on mental health in a subsequent pregnancy and postpartum. Data were obtained from a sub-sample (N = 584) of the 1973-78 cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, a prospective cohort study that has been collecting data since 1996. Pregnancy loss was defined as miscarriage, termination due to medical reasons, ectopic pregnancy and stillbirth. Mental health outcomes included depression, anxiety, stress or distress, sadness or low mood, excessive worry, lack of enjoyment, and feelings of guilt. Demographic factors and mental health history were controlled for in the analysis. Women with a previous pregnancy loss were more likely to experience sadness or low mood (AOR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.76, p = 0.0162), and excessive worry (AOR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.24 to 3.24, p = 0.0043) during a subsequent pregnancy, but not during the postpartum phase following a subsequent birth. These results indicate that while women who have experienced a pregnancy loss are a more vulnerable population during a subsequent pregnancy, these deficits are not evident in the postpartum.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0095038

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anxiety and depression have been demonstrated in a subsequent pregnancy, with almost twice the odds of experiencing sadness or low mood and excessive worry compared with women without a previous loss.

    “Anxiety and depression have also been demonstrated in a subsequent pregnancy, with almost twice the odds of experiencing sadness or low mood and excessive worry, compared with those women without a previous loss.5,6”

    From Posttraumatic stress, anxiety and depression following miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study (2020) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results (Table 4) report higher odds of sadness or low mood (adjusted OR 1.75) and excessive worry (adjusted OR 2.01) during a subsequent pregnancy after prior pregnancy loss. But the Results explicitly find no evidence of an association with anxiety or depression, which the citing sentence also attributes to the source. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [2]Lok IH, Yip AS, Lee DT, Sahota D, Chung TK (2010) A 1-year longitudinal study of psychological morbidity after miscarriage. Fertil Steril 93: 1966– 1975. 19185858
  2. [3]Bradshaw Z, Slade P (2003) The effects of induced abortion on emotional experiences and relationships: a critical review of the literature. Clin Psychol Rev 23: 929– 958. 14624822
  3. [4]Brier N (2004) Anxiety after miscarriage: a review of the empirical literature and implications for clinical practice. Birth 31: 138– 142. 15153134
  4. [5]Fertl KI, Bergner A, Beyer R, Klapp BF, Rauchfuss M (2009) Levels and effects of different forms of anxiety during pregnancy after a prior miscarriage. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 142: 23– 29. 18986753
  5. [7]Toffol E, Koponen P, Partonen T (2013) Miscarriage and mental health: Results of two population-based studies. Psychiatry Research 205: 151– 158. 22985545
  6. [8]Bergner A, Beyer R, Klapp BF, Rauchfuss M (2008) Pregnancy after early pregnancy loss: a prospective study of anxiety, depressive symptomatology and coping. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 29: 105– 113. 17943588
  7. [9]Gong X, Hao J, Tao F, Zhang J, Wang H, et al (2013) Pregnancy loss and anxiety and depression during subsequent pregnancies: data from the C-ABC study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 166: 30– 36. 23146315
  8. [10]Armstrong DS, Hutti MH, Myers J (2009) The influence of prior perinatal loss on parents' psychological distress after the birth of a subsequent healthy infant. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 38: 654– 666. 19930279
  9. [11]Lee C, Dobson AJ, Brown WJ, Bryson L, Byles JE, et al (2005) Cohort profile: The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. International Journal of Epidemiology 34: 987– 991. 15894591
  10. [12]Brown WJ, Dobson AJ, Bryson L, Byles JE (1999) Women's Health Australia: On the progress of the main cohort studies. Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine 8: 681– 688. 10839654
  11. [15]Austin MP, Leader L (2000) Maternal stress and obstetric and infant outcomes: epidemiological findings and neuroendocrine mechanisms. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 40: 331– 337. 11065043
  12. [18]Austin MP, Middleton P, Highet NJ (2011) Australian Mental Health reform in the perinatal period: improving health outcomes for mothers, infants and families [Editorial]. Medical Journal of Australia 195: 112– 113. 21806527

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chojenta, C., Harris, S., Reilly, N., Forder, P., Austin, M.-P., & Loxton, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Chojenta, Catherine
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-04-14
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
e95038
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060659432
Cited by
81
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • St John of God Health Care
  • Australian Government
  • University of Queensland
  • Bupa Health Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
miscarriage, subsequent pregnancy, postpartum mental health, depression, anxiety, depressive mood, excessive worry, guilt, stillbirth, ectopic pregnancy, abortion, maternal mental health
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Australia, Demography, Emotions, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Mental Health, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Women's Health, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review