Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autophagic-Lysosomal Inhibition Compromises Ubiquitin-Proteasome System Performance in a p62 Dependent Manner in Cardiomyocytes

Tian, Zongwen, Wang, Changhua, Hu, Chengjun, Tian, Yihao, Liu, Jinbao, Wang, Xuejun·2014·PLoS ONE

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0100715

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Lysosomal inhibition accumulates both autophagic and proteasomal substrates in mice: hearts and kidneys. Male GFPdgn transgenic mice at 10 weeks of age were treated with bortezomib (BZM, 1 mg/kg, i.p.), bafilomycin A1 (BFA, 2.5 mg/kg/12 hrs, i.p.), or vehicle control (CTL). The mice were sacrificed at either 3 or 24 hours after the first injection and myocardial and kidney tissues were collected for total protein and RNA extraction and subsequent analysis. A and B, Representative images (A) and pooled of densitometry data (B) of western blot analyses for myocardial GFPdgn and other indicated proteins. C, Representative images (upper) and pooled densitometry data (lower) of western blot analyses for renal GFPdgn protein levels. D and E, Representative images (upper) and pooled densitometry data of reverse transcription (RT) PCR analyses of GFPdgn mRNA levels in heart and kidney tissues. Total RNA was used for the RT to synthesize the first strand cDNA which was subsequently used for GFPdgn and GAPDH duplex RT-PCR. GAPDH was probed as loading control. N = 4 mice/group. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs. CTL.
Figure 1 Lysosomal inhibition accumulates both autophagic and proteasomal substrates in mice: hearts and kidneys. Male GFPdgn transgenic mice at 10 weeks of age were treated with bortezomib (BZM, 1 mg/kg, i.p.), bafilomycin A1 (BFA, 2.5 mg/kg/12 hrs, i.p.), or vehicle control (CTL). The mice were sacrificed at either 3 or 24 hours after the first injection and myocardial and kidney tissues were collected for total protein and RNA extraction and subsequent analysis. A and B, Representative images (A) and pooled of densitometry data (B) of western blot analyses for myocardial GFPdgn and other indicated proteins. C, Representative images (upper) and pooled densitometry data (lower) of western blot analyses for renal GFPdgn protein levels. D and E, Representative images (upper) and pooled densitometry data of reverse transcription (RT) PCR analyses of GFPdgn mRNA levels in heart and kidney tissues. Total RNA was used for the RT to synthesize the first strand cDNA which was subsequently used for GFPdgn and GAPDH duplex RT-PCR. GAPDH was probed as loading control. N = 4 mice/group. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs. CTL.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Representative confocal micrographs of mouse myocardial direct green fluorescence. Adult GFPdgn non-transgenic (A) and transgenic (B ∼ D) mice at 10 weeks of age were treated with bortezomib (1 mg/kg, i.p.; C), bafilomycin A1 (BFA, 2.5 mg/kg/12 hrs, i.p.; D), or vehicle control (DMSO, A and B). At 24 hours after the first BFA injection, ventricular myocardial tissues were collected and immediately immersion-fixed with 3.8% paraformaldehyde and processed for cryo-sectioning. The cryosections were mounted and imaged for direct fluorescence via confocal microscopy. Scale bar = 100 µm.
Figure 2 Representative confocal micrographs of mouse myocardial direct green fluorescence. Adult GFPdgn non-transgenic (A) and transgenic (B ∼ D) mice at 10 weeks of age were treated with bortezomib (1 mg/kg, i.p.; C), bafilomycin A1 (BFA, 2.5 mg/kg/12 hrs, i.p.; D), or vehicle control (DMSO, A and B). At 24 hours after the first BFA injection, ventricular myocardial tissues were collected and immediately immersion-fixed with 3.8% paraformaldehyde and processed for cryo-sectioning. The cryosections were mounted and imaged for direct fluorescence via confocal microscopy. Scale bar = 100 µm.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Lysosomal inhibition does not alter proteasome abundance and proteasome peptidase activities in mouse hearts. Mice were treated as described in Figure 1. A, Representative images of western blot analyses for the representative subunits of the 19S proteasome (Rpt6) and the 20S proteasome (α3, α4, β2, and β5) in the total protein extracts from ventricular myocardium. B, Pooled densitometry data of β2 and β5 subunits as analyzed in A. C, Proteasome peptidase activity assays. Synthetic fluorogenic substrates specific for chyomtrypin-like, caspase-like, and trypin-like peptidases were used to measure the proteasomal peptidase activities in the crude protein extracts from ventricular myocardium collected from mice treated with BFA or vehicle control (CTL) for 24 hours. The assay was performed in the absence (-) or presence (+) of ATP to detect the activity of the 20S and the 26S proteasome, respectively. Proteasome inhibitor-suppressible activities were attributed to the proteasome. N = 4 mice/group. **p<0.01 vs. the respective group without ATP.
Figure 3 Lysosomal inhibition does not alter proteasome abundance and proteasome peptidase activities in mouse hearts. Mice were treated as described in Figure 1. A, Representative images of western blot analyses for the representative subunits of the 19S proteasome (Rpt6) and the 20S proteasome (α3, α4, β2, and β5) in the total protein extracts from ventricular myocardium. B, Pooled densitometry data of β2 and β5 subunits as analyzed in A. C, Proteasome peptidase activity assays. Synthetic fluorogenic substrates specific for chyomtrypin-like, caspase-like, and trypin-like peptidases were used to measure the proteasomal peptidase activities in the crude protein extracts from ventricular myocardium collected from mice treated with BFA or vehicle control (CTL) for 24 hours. The assay was performed in the absence (-) or presence (+) of ATP to detect the activity of the 20S and the 26S proteasome, respectively. Proteasome inhibitor-suppressible activities were attributed to the proteasome. N = 4 mice/group. **p<0.01 vs. the respective group without ATP.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Dynamic effects of ALP inhibition via 3-MA or BFA on p62 protein levels and a surrogate UPS substrate in cultured neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs). Cultured NRVMs were infected with adenoviruses to express GFPu and RFP (Ad-GFPu, Ad-RFP) 48 hr before 3-methyladenine (3-MA) or bafilomycin A1 (BFA) treatment. A ∼ C, The time course of protein level changes in the GFPu/RFP ratio and the p62/β-tubulin ratio in NRVMs treated with 3-MA (3 mM) or vehicle control. Representative images of western blots (A) and quantitative data from 3 repeats (B, C) are shown. Paired t-test, *p<0.01. D and E, 3-MA and BFA concentration-dependently increases GFPu/RFP ratio at 24 hours. At 24 hr after the drug treatment, the cells were harvested for total protein extraction and western blot analyses of the indicated proteins. Representative images (D) and pooled densitometry data (E) are shown. Two-way ANOVA followed by the Scheffé's test; *p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs. CTL; n = 3 repeats/group.
Figure 4 Dynamic effects of ALP inhibition via 3-MA or BFA on p62 protein levels and a surrogate UPS substrate in cultured neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs). Cultured NRVMs were infected with adenoviruses to express GFPu and RFP (Ad-GFPu, Ad-RFP) 48 hr before 3-methyladenine (3-MA) or bafilomycin A1 (BFA) treatment. A ∼ C, The time course of protein level changes in the GFPu/RFP ratio and the p62/β-tubulin ratio in NRVMs treated with 3-MA (3 mM) or vehicle control. Representative images of western blots (A) and quantitative data from 3 repeats (B, C) are shown. Paired t-test, *p<0.01. D and E, 3-MA and BFA concentration-dependently increases GFPu/RFP ratio at 24 hours. At 24 hr after the drug treatment, the cells were harvested for total protein extraction and western blot analyses of the indicated proteins. Representative images (D) and pooled densitometry data (E) are shown. Two-way ANOVA followed by the Scheffé's test; *p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs. CTL; n = 3 repeats/group.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Inhibition of the ALP stabilizes a UPS substrate. NRVMs were cultured and infected with Ad-GFPu/Ad-RFP viral mixture as described in Figure 4 . Forty-eight hours later, the cells were treated with 3-MA (2 mM, A and B) or BFA (10 nM, C and D), or respective vehicle control (CTL) for 12 hrs; then, the treatment of cycloheximide (CHX, 50 µM) was initiated. Immediately before (0 min) or 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after CHX administration, the cells were harvested for western blot analyses for GFPu and RFP. Representative western blot analysis images (A, C) and densitometry data pooled from 3 biological repeats (B, D) are shown. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs. CTL.
Figure 5 Inhibition of the ALP stabilizes a UPS substrate. NRVMs were cultured and infected with Ad-GFPu/Ad-RFP viral mixture as described in Figure 4 . Forty-eight hours later, the cells were treated with 3-MA (2 mM, A and B) or BFA (10 nM, C and D), or respective vehicle control (CTL) for 12 hrs; then, the treatment of cycloheximide (CHX, 50 µM) was initiated. Immediately before (0 min) or 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after CHX administration, the cells were harvested for western blot analyses for GFPu and RFP. Representative western blot analysis images (A, C) and densitometry data pooled from 3 biological repeats (B, D) are shown. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs. CTL.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Representative confocal fluorescence micrographs of NRVMs grown on cover glasses. Ad-GFPu infection and BFA (10 nM) treatment are as described in Figure 4 . At 24 hr after BFA treatment, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and subject to immunofluorescence staining for p62 (red). GFPu direct fluorescence (green) and p62 indirect immunofluorescence were visualized and captured using a confocal microscope. In the BFA treated cells, both p62 and GFPu are increased and the increased GFPu is co-localized with p62. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 6 Representative confocal fluorescence micrographs of NRVMs grown on cover glasses. Ad-GFPu infection and BFA (10 nM) treatment are as described in Figure 4 . At 24 hr after BFA treatment, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and subject to immunofluorescence staining for p62 (red). GFPu direct fluorescence (green) and p62 indirect immunofluorescence were visualized and captured using a confocal microscope. In the BFA treated cells, both p62 and GFPu are increased and the increased GFPu is co-localized with p62. Scale bar = 50 µm.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Autophagic inhibition accumulates GFPu in a p62 dependent manner. Cultured NRVMs were infected with adenoviruses to express GFPu and RFP (Ad-GFPu/RFP) 24 hours before transfection with siRNA for Atg7 (siAtg7), Rab7 (siRab7) and/or for p62 (sip62). A luciferase-specific siRNA (siLuc) was used as control for siRNA infection and off-target effects. The cells were harvested at 48 h later for extracting total proteins. A, Shown are representative images out of 3 repeats. B, pooled densitometry data. *p<0.05 vs. CTL.
Figure 7 Autophagic inhibition accumulates GFPu in a p62 dependent manner. Cultured NRVMs were infected with adenoviruses to express GFPu and RFP (Ad-GFPu/RFP) 24 hours before transfection with siRNA for Atg7 (siAtg7), Rab7 (siRab7) and/or for p62 (sip62). A luciferase-specific siRNA (siLuc) was used as control for siRNA infection and off-target effects. The cells were harvested at 48 h later for extracting total proteins. A, Shown are representative images out of 3 repeats. B, pooled densitometry data. *p<0.05 vs. CTL.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. X Wang, 2013, Posttranslational modification and quality control, Circ Res, 112, 367, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.268706 · DOI
  2. SM Day, 2013, The ubiquitin proteasome system in human cardiomyopathies and heart failure, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 304, H1283, 10.1152/ajpheart.00249.2012 · DOI
  3. X Wang, 2014, Proteasomal and lysosomal protein degradation and heart disease, J Mol Cell Cardiol, 71C, 16, 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.11.006 · DOI
  4. Schlossarek S, Englmann DR, Sultan KR, Sauer M, Eschenhagen T, <etal>et al</etal>.. (2012) Defective proteolytic systems in Mybpc3-targeted mice with cardiac hypertrophy. Basic Res Cardiol 107: doi: 10.1007/s00395-00011-00235-00393 · DOI
  5. S Schlossarek, 2011, The ubiquitin-proteasome system in cardiomyopathies, Curr Opin Cardiol, 26, 190, 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32834598fe · DOI
  6. GW Young, 2008, Understanding proteasome assembly and regulation: importance to cardiovascular medicine, Trends Cardiovasc Med, 18, 93, 10.1016/j.tcm.2008.01.004 · DOI
  7. S Kaushik, 2012, Chaperone-mediated autophagy: a unique way to enter the lysosome world, Trends Cell Biol, 22, 407, 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.05.006 · DOI
  8. M Xie, 2014, HDAC Inhibition Blunts Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Inducing Cardiomyocyte Autophagy, Circulation, 129, 1139, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002416 · DOI
  9. CR Morales, 2014, Oxidative stress and autophagy in cardiovascular homeostasis, Antioxid Redox Signal, 20, 507, 10.1089/ars.2013.5359 · DOI
  10. Z Giricz, 2012, Autophagy, myocardial protection, and the metabolic syndrome, J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 60, 125, 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318256ce10 · DOI
  11. DA Kubli, 2012, Mitochondria and mitophagy: the yin and yang of cell death control, Circ Res, 111, 1208, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.265819 · DOI
  12. AB Gustafsson, 2009, Autophagy in ischemic heart disease, Circ Res, 104, 150, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.187427 · DOI
  13. X Xu, 2013, Macrophage migration inhibitory factor plays a permissive role in the maintenance of cardiac contractile function under starvation through regulation of autophagy, Cardiovasc Res, 99, 412, 10.1093/cvr/cvt116 · DOI
  14. R Guo, 2012, Deficiency in AMPK attenuates ethanol-induced cardiac contractile dysfunction through inhibition of autophagosome formation, Cardiovasc Res, 94, 480, 10.1093/cvr/cvs127 · DOI
  15. S Sciarretta, 2012, Pharmacological modulation of autophagy during cardiac stress, J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 60, 235, 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3182575f61 · DOI
  16. VI Korolchuk, 2010, Mechanisms of cross-talk between the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy-lysosome systems, FEBS Lett, 584, 1393, 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.12.047 · DOI
  17. H Su, 2011, p62 Stages an interplay between the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy in the heart of defense against proteotoxic stress, Trends Cardiovasc Med, 21, 224, 10.1016/j.tcm.2012.05.015 · DOI
  18. Q Zheng, 2011, Proteasome malfunction activates macroautophagy in the heart, Am J Cardiovasc Dis, 1, 214
  19. VI Korolchuk, 2009, Autophagy inhibition compromises degradation of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway substrates, Mol Cell, 33, 517, 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
  20. AR Kumarapeli, 2005, A novel transgenic mouse model reveals deregulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the heart by doxorubicin, FASEB J, 19, 2051, 10.1096/fj.05-3973fje · DOI
  21. MJ Ranek, 2014, Muscarinic 2 receptors modulate cardiac proteasome function in a protein kinase G-dependent manner, J Mol Cell Cardiol, 69C, 43, 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.01.017 · DOI
  22. MJ Ranek, 2013, Protein kinase G positively regulates proteasome-mediated degradation of misfolded proteins, Circulation, 128, 365, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001971 · DOI
  23. M Tang, 2010, Proteasome functional insufficiency activates the calcineurin-NFAT pathway in cardiomyocytes and promotes maladaptive remodelling of stressed mouse hearts, Cardiovasc Res, 88, 424, 10.1093/cvr/cvq217 · DOI
  24. Z Tian, 2012, Genetically Induced Moderate Inhibition of the Proteasome in Cardiomyocytes Exacerbates Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mice, Circ Res, 111, 532, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.270983 · DOI
  25. X Wang, 2001, Mouse model of desmin-related cardiomyopathy, Circulation, 103, 2402, 10.1161/01.CIR.103.19.2402 · DOI
  26. H Su, 2011, COP9 signalosome regulates autophagosome maturation, Circulation, 124, 2117, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.048934 · DOI
  27. D Lei, 2013, Hepatic deficiency of COP9 signalosome subunit 8 induces ubiquitin-proteasome system impairment and Bim-mediated apoptosis in murine livers, PLoS One, 8, e67793, 10.1371/journal.pone.0067793 · DOI
  28. Q Zheng, 2011, Autophagy and p62 in cardiac proteinopathy, Circ Res, 109, 296, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.244707 · DOI · Paper page
  29. NF Bence, 2001, Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by protein aggregation, Science, 292, 1552, 10.1126/science.292.5521.1552 · DOI
  30. X Dong, 2004, In situ dynamically monitoring the proteolytic function of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in cultured cardiac myocytes, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 287, H1417, 10.1152/ajpheart.01233.2003 · DOI
  31. S Tydlacka, 2008, Differential activities of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in neurons versus glia may account for the preferential accumulation of misfolded proteins in neurons, J Neurosci, 28, 13285, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4393-08.2008 · DOI
  32. Y Ichimura, 2008, Selective turnover of p62/A170/SQSTM1 by autophagy, Autophagy, 4, 1063, 10.4161/auto.6826 · DOI
  33. AM Taherbhoy, 2011, Atg8 transfer from Atg7 to Atg3: a distinctive E1–E2 architecture and mechanism in the autophagy pathway, Mol Cell, 44, 451, 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.034 · DOI
  34. M Komatsu, 2005, Impairment of starvation-induced and constitutive autophagy in Atg7-deficient mice, J Cell Biol, 169, 425, 10.1083/jcb.200412022 · DOI · Paper page
  35. X Ao, 2014, Regulation of autophagy by the Rab GTPase network, Cell Death Differ, 21, 348, 10.1038/cdd.2013.187 · DOI · Paper page
  36. EL Eskelinen, 2005, Maturation of autophagic vacuoles in Mammalian cells, Autophagy, 1, 1, 10.4161/auto.1.1.1270 · DOI · Paper page
  37. S Jager, 2004, Role for Rab7 in maturation of late autophagic vacuoles, J Cell Sci, 117, 4837, 10.1242/jcs.01370 · DOI
  38. X Wang, 2013, Ubiquitin receptors and protein quality control, J Mol Cell Cardiol, 55, 73, 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.09.012 · DOI
  39. K Lindsten, 2003, A transgenic mouse model of the ubiquitin/proteasome system, Nat Biotechnol, 21, 897, 10.1038/nbt851 · DOI
  40. H Appelqvist, 2013, The lysosome: from waste bag to potential therapeutic target, J Mol Cell Biol, 5, 214, 10.1093/jmcb/mjt022 · DOI · Paper page
  41. L Qiao, 2008, Lysosomal enzyme cathepsin D protects against alpha-synuclein aggregation and toxicity, Mol Brain, 1, 17, 10.1186/1756-6606-1-17 · DOI
  42. P Tannous, 2008, Intracellular protein aggregation is a proximal trigger of cardiomyocyte autophagy, Circulation, 117, 3070, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.763870 · DOI
  43. M Komatsu, 2006, Loss of autophagy in the central nervous system causes neurodegeneration in mice, Nature, 441, 880, 10.1038/nature04723 · DOI · Paper page
  44. T Johansen, 2011, Selective autophagy mediated by autophagic adapter proteins, Autophagy, 7, 279, 10.4161/auto.7.3.14487 · DOI
  45. AB Birgisdottir, 2013, The LIR motif - crucial for selective autophagy, J Cell Sci, 126, 3237, 10.1242/jcs.126128 · DOI
  46. S Kostin, 2003, Myocytes die by multiple mechanisms in failing human hearts, Circ Res, 92, 715, 10.1161/01.RES.0000067471.95890.5C · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Tian, Z., Wang, C., Hu, C., Tian, Y., Liu, J., & Wang, X.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-06-24
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
e100715
ISSN
1932-6203
Cited by
35
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review