Cited by 74Health Policy Implementation ScienceClinical practice guidelines implementationHealth Sciences Research and Education

Tailored implementation of evidence-based practice for patients with chronic diseases

Open access
Wensing, Michel, Huntink, Elke, van Lieshout, Jan, Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek, Kowalczyk, Anna, Jäger, Cornelia, Steinhäuser, Jost, Aakhus, Eivind +3 more·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When designing interventions and policies to implement evidence based healthcare, tailoring strategies to the targeted individuals and organizations has been recommended. We aimed to gather insights into the ideas of a variety of people for implementing evidence-based practice for patients with chronic diseases, which were generated in five European countries. METHODS: A qualitative study in five countries (Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, United Kingdom) was done, involving overall 115 individuals. A purposeful sample of four categories of stakeholders (healthcare professionals, quality improvement officers, healthcare purchasers and authorities, and health researchers) was involved in group interviews in each of the countries to generate items for improving healthcare in different chronic conditions per country: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, depression in elderly people, multi-morbidity, obesity. A disease-specific standardized list of determinants of practice in these conditions provided the starting point for these groups. The content of the suggested items was categorized in a pre-defined framework of 7 domains and specific themes in the items were identified within each domain. RESULTS: The 115 individuals involved in the study generated 812 items, of which 586 addressed determinants of practice. These largely mapped onto three domains: individual health professional factors, patient factors, and professional interactions. Few items addressed guideline factors, incentives and resources, capacity of organizational change, or social, political and legal factors. The relative numbers of items in the different domains were largely similar across stakeholder categories within each of the countries. The analysis identified 29 specific themes in the suggested items across countries. CONCLUSION: The type of suggestions for improving healthcare practice was largely similar across different stakeholder groups, mainly addressing healthcare professionals, patient factors and professional interactions. As this study is one of the first of its kind, it is important that more research is done on tailored implementation strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0101981

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the previous review, the rigour of the determinants analyses failed to predict effectiveness.

    “However, it was difficult to judge the rigour of the analysis of determinants since little is yet known of the most useful approaches (Huntink 2014; Wensing 2014), and this variable failed to predict effectiveness.”

    From Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice (2015) · cites this paper as Wensing 2014

  • Strategies to address determinants may be selected in different ways.

    “Once determinants have been identified and those to be addressed have been chosen, strategies to address them have to be selected, but this process may be undertaken in different ways (Wensing 2014).”

    From Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice (2015) · cites this paper as Wensing 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wensing, M., Huntink, E., van Lieshout, J., Godycki-Cwirko, M., Kowalczyk, A., Jäger, C., Steinhäuser, J., Aakhus, E., Flottorp, S., Eccles, M., & Baker, R.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten (NO)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Wensing, Michel
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-07-08
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
e101981
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119270647
Cited by
74
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
15.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission (258837, 2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007)
  • ZonMw (200310011)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
evidence-based practice implementation, chronic disease, stakeholder perspectives, healthcare workers, patient factors, professional interaction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, geriatric depression, multimorbidity, obesity, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Disease Management, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review