The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ovarian Cancer Cell Line Panel (OCCP): Clinical Importance of In Vitro Morphological Subtypes
Open accessAbstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease and remains the most lethal gynaecological malignancy in the Western world. Therapeutic approaches need to account for inter-patient and intra-tumoural heterogeneity and detailed characterization of in vitro models representing the different histological and molecular ovarian cancer subtypes is critical to enable reliable preclinical testing. There are approximately 100 publicly available ovarian cancer cell lines but their cellular and molecular characteristics are largely undescribed. We have characterized 39 ovarian cancer cell lines under uniform conditions for growth characteristics, mRNA/microRNA expression, exon sequencing, drug response for clinically-relevant therapeutics and collated all available information on the original clinical features and site of origin. We tested for statistical associations between the cellular and molecular features of the lines and clinical features. Of the 39 ovarian cancer cell lines, 14 were assigned as high-grade serous, four serous-type, one low-grade serous and 20 non-serous type. Three morphological subtypes: Epithelial (n = 21), Round (n = 7) and Spindle (n = 12) were identified that showed distinct biological and molecular characteristics, including overexpression of cell movement and migration-associated genes in the Spindle subtype. Comparison with the original clinical data showed association of the spindle-like tumours with metastasis, advanced stage, suboptimal debulking and poor prognosis. In addition, the expression profiles of Spindle, Round and Epithelial morphologies clustered with the previously described C1-stromal, C5-mesenchymal and C4 ovarian subtype expression profiles respectively. Comprehensive profiling of 39 ovarian cancer cell lines under controlled, uniform conditions demonstrates clinically relevant cellular and genomic characteristics. This data provides a rational basis for selecting models to develop specific treatment approaches for histological and molecular subtypes of ovarian cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Still, often phenotypes such as drug response observed in vitro have been unable to mirror in vivo models, likely due to factors missing in the tumor microenvironment that are absent from homogeneous cell lines cultures such as stromal and immune cells (Beaufort et al., 2014).”
From Three-dimensional modelling of ovarian cancer: from cell lines to organoids for discovery and personalized medicine (2022) · cites this paper as Beaufort et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robinson, J. T., Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Winckler, W., Guttman, M., Lander, E. S., Getz, G., & Mesirov, J. P. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1754 · Cited by 15,390 · cited 1×
“Sequence analysis and variant verification was performed as described previously [26,27].”
MethodThe Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity
Barretina, J., Caponigro, G., Stransky, N., Venkatesan, K., Margolin, A. A., Kim, S., Wilson, C. J., Lehár, J., Kryukov, G. V., Sonkin, D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11003 · Cited by 7,950 · cited 1×
“analysed genomic data for 47 ovarian cancer cell lines from the CCLE collection [13] for genetic similarity to highgrade serous ovarian carcinomas from the TCGA data [4,57].”
BackgroundIntegrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma
Perou, C. M. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/hvp3-wg08 · Cited by 7,927
Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz, L. A., & Kinzler, K. W. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235122 · Cited by 7,863
Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11404 · Cited by 3,994
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Endowed, S. C. F. (1999) · Anthropology News · doi:10.1111/an.1999.40.2.6 · Cited by 3,132
Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells
Garnett, M. J., Edelman, E. J., Heidorn, S. J., Greenman, C. D., Dastur, A., Lau, K. W., Greninger, P., Thompson, I. R., Luo, X., Soares, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11005 · Cited by 2,456 · cited 1×
“Worldwide, there are about 100 ovarian cancer cell lines generated as described in literature [12–17] and about 70 of these are available at ATCC, ECACC, RIKEN, DSMZ, JCRB or Cancer Research Technology.”
BackgroundOne Hundred and Twenty-Seven Cultured Human Tumor Cell Lines Producing Tumors in Nude Mice23
Fogh, J., Fogh, J. M., & Orfeo, T. (1977) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/59.1.221 · Cited by 1,599
Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes
Vaughan, S., Coward, J. I. G., Bast, R. C., Berchuck, A., Berek, J. S., Brenton, J. D., Coukos, G., Crum, C. P., Drapkin, R., Etemadmoghadam, D., et al. (2011) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3144 · Cited by 1,484 · cited 1×
“The remaining histiotypes are mucinous, endometrioid and clear cell [3].”
BackgroundNovel Molecular Subtypes of Serous and Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer Linked to Clinical Outcome
Tothill, R. W., Tinker, A. V., George, J., Brown, R. E., Fox, S. B., Lade, S., Johnson, D., Trivett, M. K., Etemadmoghadam, D., Locandro, B., et al. (2008) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0196 · Cited by 1,458 · cited 7×
“We used the expression data for 267 malignant ovarian carcinomas (GSE9891) [11] to determine the clinical significance of the morphological subtypes seen in our cell lines.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 406
Weingarten, C., Jenudi, Y., Tshuva, R. Y., Moskovich, D., Alfandari, A., Hercbergs, A. A., Davis, P. J., Ellis, M. H., & Ashur‐Fabian, O. (2017) · Hormones and Cancer · doi:10.1007/s12672-017-0316-3 · Cited by 35
Inhibition of relaxin autocrine signaling confers therapeutic vulnerability in ovarian cancer
Burston, H. E., Kent, O. A., Communal, L., Udaskin, M. L., Sun, R., Brown, K. R., Jung, E., Francis, K. E., Rose, J. L., Lowitz, J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci142677 · Cited by 35
“…1 clear cell, and 4 of unknown histotype based on the suitability scores described by Medrano et al. (11), Marcotte et al. (12), Domcke et al. (13), and Beaufort et al. (14) (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI142677DS1).”
BackgroundInfluentialSchumann, C., Chan, S., Khalimonchuk, O., Khal, S., Moskal, V., Shah, V. M., Alani, A. W. G., Taratula, O. R., & Taratula, O. (2016) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00205 · Cited by 36
Mathematical models of breast and ovarian cancers
Botesteanu, D., Lipkowitz, S., Lee, J., & Levy, D. (2016) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1343 · Cited by 34
“No such description of in vivo cancer-cell kinetics has been described to date, and the clinical relevance of ovarian cancer cell lines remains an issue subject to further exploration.(137)”
BackgroundEetezadi, S., Evans, J. C., Shen, Y.-T., Souza, R. D., Piquette‐Miller, M., & Allen, C. J. (2017) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00843 · Cited by 34
Establishment and Characterization of the Novel High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Cell Line OVPA8
Tudrej, P., Olbryt, M., Zembala‐Nożyńska, E., Kujawa, K. A., Cortez, A. J., Fiszer-Kierzkowska, A., Pigłowski, W., Nikiel, B., Głowala‐Kosińska, M., Bartkowska‐Chrobok, A., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19072080 · Cited by 34
“A2780 cells (E) have round-shaped morphology (according to [10]), while ES2 cells (H) have spindle-shaped morphology [10].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIdentification and antitumor activity of a novel inhibitor of the NIMA-related kinase NEK6
Donato, M. D., Righino, B., Filippetti, F., Battaglia, A., Petrillo, M., Pirolli, D., Scambia, G., Rosa, M. C. D., & Gallo, D. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34471-y · Cited by 34
Liu, S., Zou, Q., Chen, J., Yao, X., Guan, P., Liang, W., Deng, P., Lai, X., Yin, J., Chen, J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci145035 · Cited by 33
“30), and other published databases (31, 32).”
Heredia-Soto, V., Redondo, A., Berjón, A., Miguel-Martín, M., Díaz, E., Crespo, R., Hernández, A., Yébenes, L., Gallego, A., Feliu, J., et al. (2018) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.25098 · Cited by 33
Diep, C. H., Knutson, T. P., & Lange, C. A. (2015) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-15-0431 · Cited by 33
“We selected ES-2 cells due to their inherent aggressive nature and rapid growth rate (54), low endogenous PR mRNA levels (21), andmolecular and genomic characteristics that are similar to primary tumors of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (the most common cancer of the ovary; ref.”
BackgroundFaddaoui, A., Sheta, R., Bachvarova, M., Plante, M., Gregoire, J., Renaud, M., Sebastianelli, A., Gobeil, S., Morin, C., Ghani, K., et al. (2017) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2017.1295181 · Cited by 33
“Indeed, the SKOV3 cell line has been morphologically categorized as either mesenchymal or epithelial cell line(64) and the A2780s cell line has been characterized with intermediate (round) cellular phenotype.(64) In our hands, the SKOV3 line displayed a typical spindle-like morphology and predominant expression of mes…”
BackgroundVarankar, S., Kamble, S. C., Mali, A. M., More, M., Abraham, A., Kumar, B., Pansare, K., Narayanan, N. J., Sen, A., Dhake, R. D., et al. (2019) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgz119 · Cited by 32
“Ovarian cancer cell lines used in the study were all of the high grade serous histology (15,16).”
BackgroundMcCabe, A., Zaheed, O., McDade, S. S., & Dean, K. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2023.1104514 · Cited by 33
“There exists over 100 OC cell lines, with around 70 commercially available through the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures (ECACC), Rikagaku Kenkyusho (Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, RIKEN), Leibniz Institute DSMZ, CellBank Australia (CBA) and/or th…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialShin, H., Yang, W., Lee, E.-J., Han, G. H., Cho, H., Chay, D. B., & Kim, J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205297 · Cited by 33
Altman, M. K., Alshamrani, A. A., Jia, W. P., Nguyen, H. T., Fambrough, J. M., Tran, S. K., Patel, M. B., Hoseinzadeh, P., Beedle, A. M., & Murph, M. M. (2015) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2015.08.012 · Cited by 31
Mechanism of Cepharanthine Cytotoxicity in Human Ovarian Cancer Cells
Payon, V., Kongsaden, C., Ketchart, W., Mutirangura, A., & Wonganan, P. (2018) · Planta Medica · doi:10.1055/a-0706-7503 · Cited by 32
“It was reported that both CaOV-3 and OVCAR-3 ovarian cancer cell lines contain p53 mutation [23], but oncogenic mutations in the PI3K/AKT pathway are only detected in OVCAR-3 cells [24].”
BackgroundIshikawa, M., Iwasaki, M., Zhao, H., Saito, J., Hu, C., Sun, Q., Sakamoto, A., & Ma, D. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22041826 · Cited by 32
“Furthermore, SKOV3 unlikely represents the most common ovarian cancer cell type of high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) [52,53] and each of the ovarian cancer cell phenotypes have their own biological characteristics.”
BackgroundImproving SERS biosensors for the analysis of ovarian cancer-derived small extracellular vesicles
Ngo, C. H. L., Zhang, W., Hnit, S. S. T., & Wang, Y. (2023) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/d3an00398a · Cited by 31
Page, C. L., Amuzu, S., Rahimi, K., Gotlieb, W. H., Ragoussis, J., & Tonin, P. N. (2020) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.08.005 · Cited by 30
Park, G. B., & Kim, D. (2017) · Oncology Reports · doi:10.3892/or.2017.5941 · Cited by 30
Schumann, C., Chan, S., Millar, J. A., Bortnyak, Y., Carey, K., Fedchyk, A., Wong, L., Korzun, T., Moses, A. S., Lorenz, A. S., et al. (2018) · Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2018.03.005 · Cited by 30
Gomez, M. K., Illuzzi, G., Colomer, C., Churchman, M., Hollis, R. L., O’Connor, M. J., Gourley, C., Leo, E., & Melton, D. W. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12061503 · Cited by 33
“From our panel of validated HGSOC cell lines [39,40], ES-2 (HRR-proficient) and OVCAR8 (HRR-deficient due to hypermethylation of the BRCA1 gene promoter [41]) were chosen for the isolation of olaparib-resistant clones because of their good colony forming ability when seeded thinly.”
Promotion of Cell Death in Cisplatin-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Cells through KDM1B-DCLRE1B Modulation
Lee, Y. K., Lim, J., Yoon, S. Y., Joo, J. C., Park, S.-J., & Park, Y. J. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20102443 · Cited by 28
“Six ovarian cancer cell lines (A2780, CAOV3, TOV-112D, A2780cis, OVCAR-3, SKOV-3) were classified for their cisplatin resistance, using a previous report [28].”
MethodNagasawa, S., Ikeda, K., Horie‐Inoue, K., Sato, S., Itakura, A., Takeda, S., Hasegawa, K., & Inoue, S. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20184330 · Cited by 27
Gralewska, P., Gajek, A., Marczak, A., & Rogalska, A. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms221910557 · Cited by 29
“In this study, we evaluated how treatment with metformin would affect the anti-tumor efficacy of olaparib and whether it was possible to achieve synthetic lethality in wild-type BRCA ovarian cancer cells [39,40].”
Park, S., Kim, L. K., Park, H., Kim, H. J., & Heo, T. (2022) · Oncology Reports · doi:10.3892/or.2022.8263 · Cited by 29
“The subtypes of the ovarian cancer cell lines were as follows: A2780, not specified; OVCA433, serous; SKOV3, serous; and TOV112D, endometrioid (25).”
Chovatiya, N., Kaur, K., Huerta‐Yépez, S., Chen, P.-C., Neal, A. S., DiBernardo, G., Gumrukcu, S., Memarzadeh, S., & Jewett, A. (2022) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-022-03192-7 · Cited by 28
“Despite the administration of treatments including systemic platinum-based chemotherapy and surgery, mortality rates for ovarian cancer have not changed in recent decades [1].”
BackgroundAbdalbari, F. H., Martinez-Jaramillo, E., Forgie, B. N., Tran, E., Zorychta, E., Goyeneche, A. A., Sabri, S., & Telleria, C. M. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15215136 · Cited by 28
“…during disease progression, in which PEO1 cells contain a BRCA2 germline mutation, whereas PEO4 cells have a restored version of the gene [28,62]. with HSP90 inhibitors [63], but our results showed cytotoxicity by auranofin These provide a valuable model of cellular changes during disease…”
BackgroundIn silico analysis of DYNLL1 expression in ovarian cancer chemoresistance
Berkel, Ç., & Çaçan, E. (2020) · Cell Biology International · doi:10.1002/cbin.11352 · Cited by 27
“…incubator with 5% carbon dioxide at 37°C. Cell lines have the following characteristics: OV2008 (heterozygous for PIK3CA p.Glu545Lys (c.1633G>A; Takenaka et al., 2015), A2780 (ATM p.Pro604Ser [c.1810C>T], PTEN p.Lys128_Arg130del [c.383_391del9]; Anglesio et al., 2013; Beaufort et al., 2014).”
BackgroundNunes, S. C., Ramos, C., Santos, I. P., Mendes, C., SILVA, F. A. B. N. D., Vicente, J. B., Pereira, S. A., Félix, A., Gonçalves, L. G., & Serpa, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.722412 · Cited by 28
Harnessing preclinical models for the interrogation of ovarian cancer
Qin, T., Fan, J., Lu, F., Zhang, L., Liu, C., Xiong, Q., Zhao, Y., Chen, G., & Sun, C. (2022) · Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13046-022-02486-z · Cited by 30
Molecular characterization of 7 new established cell lines from high grade serous ovarian cancer
Kreuzinger, C., Gamperl, M., Wolf, A., Heinze, G., Geroldinger, A., Lambrechts, D., Boeckx, B., Smeets, D., Horvat, R., Aust, S., et al. (2015) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2015.03.040 · Cited by 26
Shinderman‐Maman, E., Cohen, K., Moskovich, D., Hercbergs, A. H., Werner, H., Davis, P. J., Ellis, M. H., & Ashur‐Fabian, O. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16593-x · Cited by 27
Shaw, S. K., Schreiber, C. L., Roland, F. M., Battles, P. M., Brennan, S. P., Padanilam, S. J., & Smith, B. D. (2018) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2018.03.007 · Cited by 26
Novohradský, V., Zajac, J., Vrána, O., Kašpárková, J., & Brabec, V. (2018) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.25466 · Cited by 26
“The human breast carcinoma MDAMB-231 cell line (derived from the metastatic site [59, 60] expressing wild type BRCA1 and BRCA2 [62–64, 67]) was obtained from ATCC (University Blvd. Manassas, USA).”
MethodInfluentialMacDonald, J. A., Kura, N., Sussman, C., & Woods, D. C. (2018) · Journal of Ovarian Research · doi:10.1186/s13048-018-0463-3 · Cited by 26
Marverti, G., Marraccini, C., Martello, A., D’Arca, D., Pacifico, S., Guerrini, R., Spyrakis, F., Gozzi, G., Lauriola, A., Santucci, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c02107 · Cited by 26
Oyama, Y., Shigeta, S., Tokunaga, H., Tsuji, K., Ishibashi, M., Shibuya, Y., Shimada, M., Yasuda, J., & Yaegashi, N. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251079 · Cited by 24
Singh, T., Neal, A. S., DiBernardo, G., Raheseparian, N., Moatamed, N. A., & Memarzadeh, S. (2022) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo.2022.5325 · Cited by 26
Mize, B. K., Salvi, A., Ren, Y., Burdette, J. E., & Fuchs, J. R. (2023) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/d2np00091a · Cited by 27
Li, S., Cao, J., Zhang, W., Zhang, F., Ni, G., Luo, Q., Wang, M., Tao, X., & Xia, H. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep36873 · Cited by 25
“…factors associated with both cisplatin and doxorubicin resistance in ovarian cancer, we compared the gene expression differences in A2780, A2780CIS and A2780ADR cells obtained from the European Collection of Cell Cultures (ECACC) using ovarian cancer cell line panel gene expression data 7 .”
Hypoxia Regulates DPP4 Expression, Proteolytic Inactivation, and Shedding from Ovarian Cancer Cells
Moffitt, L. R., Bilandzic, M., Wilson, A. L., Chen, Y., Gorrell, M. D., Oehler, M. K., Plebanski, M., & Stephens, A. N. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21218110 · Cited by 25
Nicotine inhibits MAPK signaling and spheroid invasion in ovarian cancer cells
Harmych, S. J., Kumar, J. P., Bouni, M. E., & Chadee, D. N. (2020) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112167 · Cited by 25
On the Mechanism of Hyperthermia-Induced BRCA2 Protein Degradation
van den Tempel, N., Zelensky, A. N., Odijk, H., Laffeber, C., Schmidt, C. K., Brandsma, I., Demmers, J., Krawczyk, P. M., & Kanaar, R. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11010097 · Cited by 25
“Helleman of the Department of Medical Oncology of the Erasmus University Medical Center, and cultured as described [95].”
MethodUnderstanding the effect of mechanical forces on ovarian cancer progression
Martinez, A., Buckley, M., Scalise, C. B., Katre, A. A., Dholakia, J., Crossman, D. K., Birrer, M. J., Berry, J. L., & Arend, R. C. (2021) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.003 · Cited by 26
Thu, K. L., Papari-Zareei, M., Stastny, V., Song, K., Peyton, M., Martínez, V. D., Zhang, Y.-A., Castro, I. B., Varella‐Garcia, M., Liang, H., et al. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.9929 · Cited by 24
“com/oncotarget and/or contamination, lack of resemblance to clinical tumors, lack of molecular characterization, and lack of availability of the most suitable models [6-8, 15-18, 32, 33].”
MethodShathasivam, P., Kollara, A., Spybey, T., Park, S., Clarke, B. A., Ringuette, M. J., & Brown, T. J. (2017) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2017.51 · Cited by 24
“In addition, ES-2 cells have an activating V600E mutation in BRAF (Estep et al, 2007), whereas SKOV3 cells have mutations in ARID1A and PIK3CA (Kang et al, 2005; Domcke et al, 2013; Beaufort et al, 2014), which are more prevalent in endometrioid and clear cell histotypes.”
BackgroundMarverti, G., Gozzi, G., Lauriola, A., Ponterini, G., Belluti, S., Imbriano, C., Costi, M. P., & D’Arca, D. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20246122 · Cited by 23
Bascetin, R., Laurent-Issartel, C., Blanc‐Fournier, C., Vendrely, C., Kellouche, S., Carreiras, F., Gallet, O., & Leroy‐Dudal, J. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120610 · Cited by 23
Elsayed, A. M., Bayraktar, E., Amero, P., Salama, S. A., Abdel‐Aziz, A. H., Ismail, R. S., Zhang, X., Ivan, C., Sood, A. K., Lopez‐Berestein, G., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22041882 · Cited by 23
“SKOV3 cells harbor an amplifying mutation for PIK3CA, whereas A2780 is characterized by loss of PTEN function [36].”
BackgroundAmanda, M., Dave, F., Pados, G., Tsolakidis, D., Gidron, Y., Pang, Y., Thomas, P., Hall, M., & Karteris, E. (2016) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo.2016.3410 · Cited by 23
“SkOv3 have mutations in TP53 and PIk3CA genes, whereas MDAH2774 have mutations in TP53, PIk3CA, kRAS, BRCA1 (silent) and BRCA2 (silent) (53).”
PTTG1 Levels Are Predictive of Saracatinib Sensitivity in Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines
Nakachi, I., Helfrich, B., Spillman, M., Mickler, E. A., Olson, C., Rice, J., Coldren, C. D., Heasley, L., Geraci, M. W., & Stearman, R. S. (2016) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12413 · Cited by 23
Chui, M. H., Doodnauth, S. A., Erdmann, N., Tiedemann, R. E., Sircoulomb, F., Drapkin, R., Shaw, P. H., & Rottapel, R. K. (2019) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-3029 · Cited by 23
“Notably, we observed that TP53-wildtype ovarian cancer cell lines A2780 and TOV21G cells, likely derived from endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma, respectively (28, 29), were particularly sensitive to chromosome missegregation.”
BackgroundGoyeneche, A. A., Lisio, M. A., Fu, L., Srinivasan, R., Capuccino, J. V., Gao, Z., & Telleria, C. M. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12030699 · Cited by 23
“disease development when using certain types of high-grade serous cells, such as the case of PEO4 and PEO6 cells representing advanced disease [13,56].”
BackgroundMoyle-Heyrman, G., Schipma, M. J., Dean, M., Davis, D. A., & Burdette, J. E. (2016) · Journal of Ovarian Research · doi:10.1186/s13048-016-0213-3 · Cited by 22
“Two other estrogen responsive OVCA cell lines, PEO1 and PEO4, have recently been reported as HGSC [55].”
BackgroundEvaluation of mitochondrial biogenesis and ROS generation in high-grade serous ovarian cancer
Koc, Z. C., Sollars, V. E., Zgheib, N. B., Rankin, G. O., & Koc, E. C. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1129352 · Cited by 22
“Among these cell lines, OVCAR-3 and OVCAR-4 are the closest cell line models to HGSOC by comparing the genomic profiles (51, 52).”
BackgroundDuan, Y., Yu, J., Chen, M., Lu, Q., Ning, F., Gan, X., Liu, H., Ye, Y., Lu, S., & Lash, G. E. (2023) · Journal of Ovarian Research · doi:10.1186/s13048-023-01156-8 · Cited by 22
“A2780, TOV21G and ES2 originated from tumor tissue [53].”
BackgroundNovel expression of CD11b in epithelial ovarian cancer: Potential therapeutic target
Saed, G. M., Fletcher, N. M., Diamond, M. P., Morris, R. T., Gomez‐Lopez, N., & Memaj, I. (2018) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.018 · Cited by 22
Natoli, M., Bonito, N. A., Robinson, J. D., Ghaem‐Maghami, S., & Mao, Y. (2020) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-020-02544-5 · Cited by 22
“4d) and the PEO1/PEO4 (Fig.”
ResultEoh, K. J., Kim, H. J., Lee, J. W., Kim, L. K., Park, S., Kim, H. S., Kim, Y. T., & Koo, J. P. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21165813 · Cited by 23
TP53 modulates radiotherapy fraction size sensitivity in normal and malignant cells
Anbalagan, S., Ström, C. E., Downs, J. A., Jeggo, P. A., McBay, D., Wilkins, A. C., Rothkamm, K., Harrington, K. J., Yarnold, J. R., & Somaiah, N. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86681-6 · Cited by 23
CHK2 Inhibition Provides a Strategy to Suppress Hematologic Toxicity from PARP Inhibitors
Xu, Z., Vandenberg, C. J., Lieschke, E., Rago, L. D., Scott, C. L., & Majewski, I. J. (2021) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-20-0791 · Cited by 22
Fusogenic peptide delivery of bioactive siRNAs targeting CSNK2A1 for treatment of ovarian cancer
Samec, T., Alatise, K. L., Boulos, J., Gilmore, S. N., Hazelton, A., Coffin, C., & Alexander-Bryant, A. A. (2022) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2022.09.012 · Cited by 21
“The cell line used in this study, OVCAR3, was selected because of its clinical relevance to high-grade serous ovarian adenocarcinoma in addition to its use in our in vitro work.(55,56) However, this cell line has had difficulty developing xeno-”
MethodTargeting eIF4E signaling with ribavirin as a sensitizing strategy for ovarian cancer
Jin, J., Xiang, W., Wu, S., Wang, M., Xiao, M., & Deng, A. (2019) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.01.117 · Cited by 21
der Meer, J. M. R. V., de Jonge, P. K. J. D., van der Waart, A. B., Geerlings, A. C., Moonen, J. P., Brummelman, J., de Klein, J., Vermeulen, M. C., Maas, R. J. A., Schaap, N. P., et al. (2021) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2021.1981049 · Cited by 21
“This is in contrast to another study showing that OVCAR-3 was most sensitive to gemcitabine, followed by IGROV-1 and SKOV-3.(29) This difference might be attributed to different incubation times (48 h in our study vs 5 days in the other study) or other differences in experimental conditions.”
ResultKunisky, A. K., Anyaeche, V. I., Herron, R. S., Park, C. Y., & Hwang, H. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109815 · Cited by 23
“Therefore, we chose A2780cis cells, an ovarian cancer cell line with cisplatin resistance (Beaufort et al., 2014), to test for possible beneficial effects from MSL1 knockdown on cisplatin treatment.”
BackgroundTranscriptomic analyses of ovarian clear-cell carcinoma with concurrent endometriosis
Collins, K. E., Wang, X., Klymenko, Y., Davis, N. B., Martinez, M. C., Zhang, C., So, K., Buechlein, A. M., Rusch, D. B., Creighton, C. J., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1162786 · Cited by 21
Sarwar, S., Alamro, A. A., Alghamdi, A. A., Naeem, K., Ullah, S., Arif, M., Yu, J., & Huq, F. (2021) · Drug Design Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s288707 · Cited by 20
“The results show that the combination was nearly additive (for more details interested readers may consult reference 24 where explanation is provided in supplementary Table 1) for all the sequences of administration in cisplatin-resistant cell line A2780cisR.”
BackgroundInfluentialDecollogne, S., Joshi, S. M., Chung, S. A., Luk, P. P., Yeo, R. X., Nixdorf, S., Fedier, A., Heinzelmann-Schwarz, V. A., Hogg, P. J., & Dilda, P. J. (2015) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.018 · Cited by 20
Shen, Y. T., Evans, J. C., Zafarana, G., Allen, C. J., & Piquette‐Miller, M. (2018) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00246 · Cited by 20
Wang, Y., Chiou, Y.-S., Chong, Q.-Y., Zhang, M., Rangappa, K. S., Ma, L., Zhu, T., Kumar, A. P., Huang, R. Y.-J., Pandey, V., et al. (2020) · ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science · doi:10.1021/acsptsci.0c00064 · Cited by 20
Differential epithelial and stromal LGR5 expression in ovarian carcinogenesis
Kim, H., Lee, D. H., Park, E., Myung, J. K., Park, J. H., Kim, D., Kim, S. I., Lee, M., Kim, Y.-H., Park, C. M., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-15234-2 · Cited by 18
“Present 26 (41) 13 (50) 13 (50) 18 (69) 8 (31)”
Psilopatis, I., Sykaras, A. G., Mandrakis, G., Vrettou, K., & Theocharis, S. E. (2022) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines11010001 · Cited by 20
The effect of inhibition of receptor tyrosine kinase AXL on DNA damage response in ovarian cancer
Yeo, X. H., Sundararajan, V., Wu, Z., Phua, Z. J. C., Ho, Y. Y., Peh, K. L. E., Chiu, Y.-C., Tan, T. Z., Kappei, D., Ho, Y. S., et al. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05045-0 · Cited by 21
Chan, W. S., Mo, X.-T., Ip, P. P. C., & Tse, K. Y. (2023) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.6521 · Cited by 20
Jang, Y., Kang, S., Han, H. H., Kim, B. G., & Cho, N. H. (2024) · Cell Death Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41420-024-01858-y · Cited by 19
“Our results suggest that the CD24-miR-130a/301a-CDK19 signaling axis could be a prognostic marker for or a potential therapeutic target against ovarian cancer recurrence.”
Losi, L., Lauriola, A., Tazzioli, E., Gozzi, G., Scurani, L., D’Arca, D., & Benhattar, J. (2019) · Journal of Ovarian Research · doi:10.1186/s13048-019-0536-y · Cited by 19
Wahab, N. A., Othman, Z., Nasri, N. W. M., Mokhtar, M. H., Ibrahim, S. F., Hamid, A. A., Ali, R. A. R., & Mokhtar, N. M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17082766 · Cited by 19
“Both Caov3 and SKOV3 cell lines have TP53 mutations, but SKOV3 cells also have ARID1A mutation, making Caov3 putative histology as serous, while SKOV3 very much represents the endometrioid histological subtype [36].”
BackgroundDelphinidin Increases the Sensitivity of Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines to 3-bromopyruvate
Pieńkowska, N., Bartosz, G., Furdak, P., & Sadowska‐Bartosz, I. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22020709 · Cited by 19
“PEO1 is a high-grade serous, and SKOV3 a non-serous, OC cell line [27,28].”
BackgroundIdentification of Epithelial Ovarian Tumor-Specific Aptamers
Benedetto, G., Hamp, T. J., Wesselman, P. J., & Richardson, C. A. (2015) · Nucleic Acid Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/nat.2014.0522 · Cited by 19
Brummelhuis, I. S. G., Fiascone, S. J., Hasselblatt, K. T., Frendl, G., & Elias, K. M. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13215437 · Cited by 18
“Unfortunately, they described only one ovarian cancer cell line, and the cell line they used, SKOV3, has recently been classified as a poor ovarian cancer model [56].”
BackgroundCombining ReACp53 with Carboplatin to Target High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancers
Neal, A. S., Lai, T. S., Singh, T., Rahseparian, N., Grogan, T., Elashoff, D. A., Scott, P., Pellegrini, M. A., & Memarzadeh, S. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13235908 · Cited by 18
“OVCAR3 cells are known to be platinum-sensitive [26]; therefore, in these experiments, tumor-bearing mice were treated with carboplatin at a dose of 10 mg/kg IP 1×/week.”
BackgroundMethodSubeha, M. R., Goyeneche, A. A., Bustamante, P., Lisio, M. A., Burnier, J. V., & Telleria, C. M. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14010099 · Cited by 17
“These cell lines demonstrated differential morphological and genetic patterns in vitro [19,20], and matched the genomic landscape of HGSOC [51].”
BackgroundMorse, D. B., Michalowski, A. M., Ceribelli, M., Jonghe, J. D., Vias, M., Riley, D., DAVIES-HILL, T. M., Voss, T. C., Pittaluga, S., Muus, C., et al. (2023) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2023.05.003 · Cited by 18
Effect of Polyplex Size on Penetration into Tumor Spheroids
Casadidio, C., Hartman, J. E. M., Mesquita, B. S., Haegebaert, R., Remaut, K., Neumann, M., Hak, J., Censi, R., Martino, P. D., Hennink, W. E., et al. (2023) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00397 · Cited by 18
Cancer Cell Line Panels Empower Genomics-Based Discovery of Precision Cancer Medicine
Kim, H. S., Sung, Y.-J., & Paik, S. (2015) · Yonsei Medical Journal · doi:10.3349/ymj.2015.56.5.1186 · Cited by 17
Paris, L., Podo, F., Spadaro, F., Abalsamo, L., Pisanu, M. E., Ricci, A. L., Cecchetti, S., Altabella, L., Buoncervello, M., Lozneanu, L., et al. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.18992 · Cited by 18
“To this end, we used two cellbased human EOC models: 1) the at present unique commercially available human HER2-overepressing EOC cell line SKOV3 (HER2+++ , EGFR++, HER3+/−, HER4+/−, PTEN+/−, p53-null) [25] and 2) its in vivopassaged and in vitro stabilized SKOV3.”
MethodHeredia-Soto, V., López‐Guerrero, J. A., Redondo, A., & Mendiola, M. (2020) · European Journal of Cancer Supplements · doi:10.1016/j.ejcsup.2019.11.003 · Cited by 21
Metformin Reduces NGF-Induced Tumour Promoter Effects in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells
Garrido, M. P., Salvatierra, R., Valenzuela, M., Vallejos, C., Bruneau, N., Hernández, A., Vega, M., Selman, A., Quest, A. F. G., & Romero, C. (2020) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph13100315 · Cited by 18
“SKOV3 cells are resistant to several cytotoxic drugs and are highly migratory and invasive [51,67], similar to metastatic cells.”
BackgroundPelegrina, L. T., Sanhueza, M. D. L. Á., Cáceres, A. R. R., Cuello-Carrión, D., Rodriguez, C. E., & Laconi, M. R. (2019) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105492 · Cited by 18
Saravi, S., Katsuta, E., Jeyaneethi, J., Amin, H. A., Kaspar, M., Takabe, K., Pados, G., Drenos, F., Hall, M., & Karteris, E. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9092844 · Cited by 17
“This refers to EOC (up to 50% of HGS) that exhibit a defective phenotype of homologous recombination repair (HRR) without BRCA mutations [34,35].”
BackgroundDučić, T., Alves, C. S., Vučinić, Ž., Martínez, J. M. L., Petković, M., Soto, J., Mutavdžić, D. R., de Yuso, M. D. V. M., Radotić, K., & Algarra, M. (2022) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2022.05.005 · Cited by 17
Ren, Y., He, J., Zhao, W., & Ma, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.901922 · Cited by 17
“Using cell lines with different morphology and origin in this study can better confirm the therapeutic effect of VB on OC (32).”
BackgroundAxemaker, H., Plesselova, S., Calar, K., Jorgensen, M. M., Wollman, J. W., & de la Puente, P. (2024) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2024.119801 · Cited by 22
Song, Y. J., Kim, J., Rajbongshi, L., Lim, Y.-S., Ok, Y.-J., Hwang, S.-Y., Park, H.-Y., Lee, J.-E., Oh, S., Kim, B. S., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26010274 · Cited by 17
Kleinmanns, K., Bischof, K., Anandan, S., Popa, M. L., Akslen, L. A., Fosse, V., Karlsen, I. T., Gjertsen, B. T., Bjørge, L., & McCormack, E. (2020) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102782 · Cited by 17
“Several reports have independently demonstrated that these cell lines result in greater molecular fidelity to HGSOC compared with the most commonly used cell line SKOV3and we additionally demonstrate the efficacy of the orthotopic OV-90 model in evaluation of clinical employed chemotherapeutics [20,21,53,54].”
ResultRodrigo, A. P., Mendes, V. M., Manadas, B. J., Grosso, A. R., Matos, A., Baptista, P. V., Costa, P. M., & Fernandes, A. R. (2021) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md19010031 · Cited by 17
“Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecological cancer in the world (see, for instance, [3]), in large part due to the late diagnosis [4].”
BackgroundKiełbik, M., Szulc-Kiełbik, I., & Klink, M. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22020980 · Cited by 17
“Moreover, it is worth to mention that presented cell lines also differ in place of origin, with A2780 and A2780cis cells originating from ovary tissue, while SK-OV-3 and OVCAR-3 cells originating from ascites [31].”
BackgroundMechanisms of Apoptosis-Related Long Non-coding RNAs in Ovarian Cancer
Takeiwa, T., Ikeda, K., Horie‐Inoue, K., & Inoue, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.641963 · Cited by 17
Gralewska, P., Gajek, A., Rybaczek, D., Marczak, A., & Rogalska, A. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11121889 · Cited by 17
“High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) accounts for approximately 50% of ovarian cancers and is characterized by TP53 mutations (96%), homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair defects (50%), cyclin E1 (CCNE1) amplification and genomic instability [2].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Beaufort, C. M., Helmijr, J. C. A., Piskorz, A. M., Hoogstraat, M., Ruigrok-Ritstier, K., Besselink, N., Murtaza, M., van IJcken, W. F. J., Heine, A. A. J., Smid, M., Koudijs, M. J., Brenton, J. D., Berns, E. M. J. J., & Helleman, J.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Berns, Els M. J. J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-09-17
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e103988
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4167545
- OpenAlex
- W2015030879
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 21
- FWCI
- 29.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2015-03-23)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK (15601)
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Keywords
- epithelial ovarian cancer, ovarian cancer cell lines, morphological subtypes, high-grade serous carcinoma, low-grade serous carcinoma, tumor heterogeneity, metastasis, prognosis, drug response, preclinical models
- MeSH terms
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, MicroRNAs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review