The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ovarian Cancer Cell Line Panel (OCCP): Clinical Importance of In Vitro Morphological Subtypes
Open accessAbstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease and remains the most lethal gynaecological malignancy in the Western world. Therapeutic approaches need to account for inter-patient and intra-tumoural heterogeneity and detailed characterization of in vitro models representing the different histological and molecular ovarian cancer subtypes is critical to enable reliable preclinical testing. There are approximately 100 publicly available ovarian cancer cell lines but their cellular and molecular characteristics are largely undescribed. We have characterized 39 ovarian cancer cell lines under uniform conditions for growth characteristics, mRNA/microRNA expression, exon sequencing, drug response for clinically-relevant therapeutics and collated all available information on the original clinical features and site of origin. We tested for statistical associations between the cellular and molecular features of the lines and clinical features. Of the 39 ovarian cancer cell lines, 14 were assigned as high-grade serous, four serous-type, one low-grade serous and 20 non-serous type. Three morphological subtypes: Epithelial (n = 21), Round (n = 7) and Spindle (n = 12) were identified that showed distinct biological and molecular characteristics, including overexpression of cell movement and migration-associated genes in the Spindle subtype. Comparison with the original clinical data showed association of the spindle-like tumours with metastasis, advanced stage, suboptimal debulking and poor prognosis. In addition, the expression profiles of Spindle, Round and Epithelial morphologies clustered with the previously described C1-stromal, C5-mesenchymal and C4 ovarian subtype expression profiles respectively. Comprehensive profiling of 39 ovarian cancer cell lines under controlled, uniform conditions demonstrates clinically relevant cellular and genomic characteristics. This data provides a rational basis for selecting models to develop specific treatment approaches for histological and molecular subtypes of ovarian cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Still, often phenotypes such as drug response observed in vitro have been unable to mirror in vivo models, likely due to factors missing in the tumor microenvironment that are absent from homogeneous cell lines cultures such as stromal and immune cells (Beaufort et al., 2014).”
From Three-dimensional modelling of ovarian cancer: from cell lines to organoids for discovery and personalized medicine (2022) · cites this paper as Beaufort et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robinson, J. T., Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Winckler, W., Guttman, M., Lander, E. S., Getz, G., & Mesirov, J. P. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1754 · Cited by 15,390 · cited 1×
“Sequence analysis and variant verification was performed as described previously [26,27].”
MethodThe Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity
Barretina, J., Caponigro, G., Stransky, N., Venkatesan, K., Margolin, A. A., Kim, S., Wilson, C. J., Lehár, J., Kryukov, G. V., Sonkin, D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11003 · Cited by 7,950 · cited 1×
“analysed genomic data for 47 ovarian cancer cell lines from the CCLE collection [13] for genetic similarity to highgrade serous ovarian carcinomas from the TCGA data [4,57].”
BackgroundIntegrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma
Perou, C. M. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/hvp3-wg08 · Cited by 7,927
Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz, L. A., & Kinzler, K. W. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235122 · Cited by 7,863
Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11404 · Cited by 3,994
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Endowed, S. C. F. (1999) · Anthropology News · doi:10.1111/an.1999.40.2.6 · Cited by 3,132
Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells
Garnett, M. J., Edelman, E. J., Heidorn, S. J., Greenman, C. D., Dastur, A., Lau, K. W., Greninger, P., Thompson, I. R., Luo, X., Soares, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11005 · Cited by 2,456 · cited 1×
“Worldwide, there are about 100 ovarian cancer cell lines generated as described in literature [12–17] and about 70 of these are available at ATCC, ECACC, RIKEN, DSMZ, JCRB or Cancer Research Technology.”
BackgroundOne Hundred and Twenty-Seven Cultured Human Tumor Cell Lines Producing Tumors in Nude Mice23
Fogh, J., Fogh, J. M., & Orfeo, T. (1977) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/59.1.221 · Cited by 1,599
Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes
Vaughan, S., Coward, J. I. G., Bast, R. C., Berchuck, A., Berek, J. S., Brenton, J. D., Coukos, G., Crum, C. P., Drapkin, R., Etemadmoghadam, D., et al. (2011) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3144 · Cited by 1,484 · cited 1×
“The remaining histiotypes are mucinous, endometrioid and clear cell [3].”
BackgroundNovel Molecular Subtypes of Serous and Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer Linked to Clinical Outcome
Tothill, R. W., Tinker, A. V., George, J., Brown, R. E., Fox, S. B., Lade, S., Johnson, D., Trivett, M. K., Etemadmoghadam, D., Locandro, B., et al. (2008) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0196 · Cited by 1,458 · cited 7×
“We used the expression data for 267 malignant ovarian carcinomas (GSE9891) [11] to determine the clinical significance of the morphological subtypes seen in our cell lines.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 406
Rogalska, A., Gajek, A., & Marczak, A. (2019) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2019.152847 · Cited by 16
Ankasha, S. J., Shafiee, M. N., Wahab, N. A., Ali, R. A. R., & Mokhtar, N. M. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18115741 · Cited by 16
“However, the genetic analysis showed that SKOV3 not only had a mutation on TP53, but also in ARID1A, where it was most likely to be endometrioid or clear cell carcinoma [37,38].”
BackgroundCruz, A. F., Biscaia-Caleiras, M., Fonseca, N. A., Gonçalves, N., Mendes, V. M., Sampaio, S. F., Moura, V., Melo, J. B., Almeida, R. D., Manadas, B. J., et al. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13123052 · Cited by 16
“Herein, it was demonstrated by Western blot that nucleolin was overexpressed in the cytoplasm and cell membrane (Figure 1B) of cell lines derived from different sub-types of patient-derived ovarian cancer as endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (TOV-112D) and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (OVCAR-3 and SKOV-3) [43], si…”
ResultGupta, P., Miller, A. F., Olayanju, A., Madhuri, T. K., & Velliou, E. G. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14051274 · Cited by 18
Choi, J., Lee, S., Yun, S.-M., Suh, D. H., Kim, K., No, J. H., Jeong, E.-H., & Kim, Y. B. (2017) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1080/01635581.2018.1380203 · Cited by 17
“CAOV3 cells originated from epithelial ovarian cancer tissue, and OV90 cells were derived from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma from ascites (19).”
BackgroundNext Generation of Ovarian Cancer Detection Using Aptamers
Abreu, R. D. S., Antunes, D., Moreira, A. D. S., Passetti, F., Mendonça, J. B., de Araújo, N. S., Sassaro, T. F., Alberto, A. V. P., Bastos, N. C., Fernandes, P. V., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24076315 · Cited by 15
“This is the most frequent, accounting for 80% of cases, and still the most aggressive among ovarian tumor types [21].”
BackgroundMarjamaa, A., Gibbs, B. E., Kotrba, C., & Masamha, C. P. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-44548-y · Cited by 15
Kulbe, H., Iorio, F., Chakravarty, P., Milagre, C. S., Moore, R., Thompson, R. G., Everitt, G. L. A., Canosa, M., Montoya, A., Drygin, D., et al. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7255 · Cited by 14
“However, the widely used cell lines SKOV-3 and IGROV-1 were implicated as not being representative of the major HGSC subtype [14-16].”
Pakuła, M., Uruski, P., Niklas, A. A., Woźniak, A., Szpurek, D., Tykarski, A., Mikuła‐Pietrasik, J., & Książek, K. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11050662 · Cited by 15
“Therefore, we designed a study in which we compared the ability of A2780 and SKOV-3 cells, which represent less aggressive endometrioid/clear cell histotypes, and of OVCAR-3 and primary EOCs, which are aggressive high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs) [9], to induce MMT.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSauriol, S. A., Simeone, K., Portelance, L., Meunier, L., Leclerc-Desaulniers, K., de Ladurantaye, M., Chergui, M., Kendall‐Dupont, J., Rahimi, K., Carmona, E., et al. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12082222 · Cited by 15
“Moreover, systematic genomic and morphological analyses of a panel of the most often used ovarian cancer cell lines suggested that most of these cell lines were unlikely to originate from HGSC [34,35,97] and, thus, are inadequate models for studying this disease.”
Rumman, M., Buck, S. A., Polin, L., Dzinic, S. H., Boerner, J. L., & Winer, I. S. (2021) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.3858 · Cited by 14
Rabelo-Fernández, R. J., Santiago-Sánchez, G. S., Sharma, R. K., Roche-Lima, A., Carrasquillo, K., Rivera, R. A. N., Quiñones‐Díaz, B. I., Rajasekaran, S., Siddiqui, J., Miles, W. O., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23010535 · Cited by 14
“A2780 cells are classified as clear cell carcinomas, while OVCAR3 cells are HGSOCs [24,25].”
BackgroundČerne, K., Kelhar, N., Resnik, N., Herzog, M., Vodnik, L., Veranič, P., & Kobal, B. (2023) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph16060907 · Cited by 13
“The examination of the BRCA1 status yielded contradictory results; a BRCA1 mutation was detected in one study, but this result was not confirmed in two other studies [33,34,44].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPascual‐Antón, L., Sandoval, P., Gónzalez-Mateo, G. T., Kopytina, V., Tomero‐Sanz, H., Arriero‐País, E. M., Jiménez-Heffernan, J. A., Fabre, M., Egaña, I., Ferrer, C., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.6170 · Cited by 14
Rutecki, S., Pakuła‐Iwańska, M., Leśniewska-Bocianowska, A., Matuszewska, J., Rychlewski, D., Uruski, P., Stryczyński, Ł., Naumowicz, E., Szubert, S., Tykarski, A., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.6223 · Cited by 14
“This effect is universal and not associated with any speci fi c feature, as the cells used in the study represent different histotypes, molecular pro fi les, and stages of the disease [52,53].”
BackgroundCámara-Quílez, M., Barreiro-Alonso, A., Vizoso‐Vázquez, Á., Rodriguez-Belmonte, E. M., Varela, M. Q., Maceiras, M. L., & Cerdán, M. E. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12092435 · Cited by 14
“MIEN1 and NOP53 by co-immunoprecipitation, an orthogonal method to the Y2H approach, and using two EOC cell lines, SKOV-3 and PEO1 representatives of ENOC/CCOC and HGSOC respectively [33].”
MethodSuicide gene strategies applied in ovarian cancer studies
Nguyen, Q. M., Dupré, P., Haute, T., Montier, T., & d’Arbonneau, F. (2023) · Cancer Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41417-023-00590-6 · Cited by 20
Lee, J., An, S., Jung, J. H., Kim, K., Kim, J. E., An, I., & Bae, S. (2019) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo.2019.4730 · Cited by 14
Ma, X., Xue, F., Pei, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2025.114656 · Cited by 13
Meijer, T. G., Martens, J. W. M., der Smissen, W. J. C. P., Verkaik, N. S., Beaufort, C. M., van Herk, S., Robert-Finestra, T., Hoogenboezem, R. M., Ruigrok-Ritstier, K., Paul, M. W., et al. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16040741 · Cited by 13
“Gene expression data for part of the BC and OC cell lines ( n = 69) were generated previously (GSE9385 and GSE53418) and measured using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Exon 1.0 ST Array [25,37].”
MethodInfluentialPala, M. A., & Yıldız, M. Z. (2024) · Optics & Laser Technology · doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.110920 · Cited by 13
Jing, F., Jing, C., Dai, X., Zhou, G., Di, S., Bi, X., Dai, T., Qin, T., & Hong, L. (2021) · PubMed Central · Cited by 13
Yuan, S., Xu, Y., Yi, T., & Wang, H. (2021) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2021.114706 · Cited by 13
Ha, J. H., Jayaraman, M., Nadhan, R., Kashyap, S., Mukherjee, P., Isidoro, C., Song, Y. S., & Dhanasekaran, D. N. (2021) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines9121927 · Cited by 15
“Utilizing genomic profiling, previous studies have contributed significantly in identifying ovarian cancer cell lines that closely resemble ovarian cancer tissues [51,52].”
BackgroundCostantino, L., Ferrari, S., Santucci, M., Salo‐Ahen, O. M. H., Carosati, E., Franchini, S., Lauriola, A., Pozzi, C., Trande, M., Gozzi, G., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.73862 · Cited by 13
Venturoli, C., Piga, I., Curtarello, M., Verza, M., Esposito, G., Venuto, S., Navaglia, F., Grassi, A., & Indraccolo, S. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells10020325 · Cited by 14
“In fact, while OVCAR3 is recognized as an almost certain model of high grade serous ovarian cancer [29,30], OC316 has an hypermutated genotype and uncertain histologic origin [31].”
BackgroundPFKFB3 Inhibition Sensitizes DNA Crosslinking Chemotherapies by Suppressing Fanconi Anemia Repair
Ninou, A. H., Lehto, J., Chioureas, D., Stigsdotter, H., Schelzig, K., Åkerlund, E., Gudoitytė, G., Joneborg, U., Carlson, J. W., Jonkers, J., et al. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13143604 · Cited by 11
“Here, we identify a cancer-specific synthetic lethality between PFKFB3 and platinum drugs treatment including restoring sensitivity to platinum in resistant cell models, independent of p53 and BRCA2 mutational status [63] (Figure 1).”
BackgroundCytotoxic effects of halophilic archaea metabolites on ovarian cancer cell lines
Kowalewicz‐Kulbat, M., Krawczyk, K. T., Szulc-Kiełbik, I., Rykowski, S., Denel‐Bobrowska, M., Olejniczak, A. B., Locht, C., & Klink, M. (2023) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-023-02206-y · Cited by 12
“…three ovarian cancer cell lines frequently used to study ovarian carcinoma: the cisplatin-sensitive ovarian tumor cell line A2780 and the corresponding cisplatin-resistant A2780cis cell line, as well as the cisplatin-resistant and highly invasive SK-OV-3 cell line, originating from ascites [21–23].”
BackgroundAdams, K. M., Wendt, J.-R., Wood, J., Olson, S. L., Moreno, R., Jin, Z., Gopalan, S., & Lang, J. D. (2025) · Cancer Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41417-025-00941-5 · Cited by 12
Weinreich, J., Struller, F., Sautkin, I., Giuashvili, S., Reymond, M. A., Königsrainer, A., & Schott, T. C. (2018) · Investigational New Drugs · doi:10.1007/s10637-018-0641-6 · Cited by 12
Takeiwa, T., Mitobe, Y., Ikeda, K., Hasegawa, K., Horie, K., & Inoue, S. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222011242 · Cited by 12
“Regarding the cells used in this study, OV90 and OVCAR3 cells are derived from high-grade serous carcinoma while ES2 cells are derived from clear cell carcinoma, and the histological subtypes from which A2780 and SKOV3 originate remain controversial [25,26].”
BackgroundInfluentialFranklin, M., Gentles, L., Matheson, E. C., Bown, N. P., Cross, P., Ralte, A. M., Gilkes‐Immeson, C., Bradbury, A., Zanjirband, M., Lunec, J., et al. (2018) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.1724 · Cited by 12
Adaptive therapy for ovarian cancer: An integrated approach to PARP inhibitor schedulingPreprint
Strobl, M. A. R., Martin, A. L., West, J., Gallaher, J. A., Robertson‐Tessi, M., Gatenby, R. A., Wenham, R. M., Maini, P. K., Damaghi, M., & Anderson, A. R. A. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.03.22.533721 · Cited by 12
Mechanomimetic 3D Scaffolds as a Humanized In Vitro Model for Ovarian Cancer
Paradiso, F., Lenna, S., Gazze, S. A., García-Parra, J., Murphy, K., Margarit, L., González, D., Francis, L. W., & Taraballi, F. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11050824 · Cited by 11
“OVCAR-3 and Caov-3 possess TP53 mutations and substantial copy-number changes, which are key characteristics of HGSC, whereas SKOV3, based on its genetic profile, is categorized as non-serous [106,107].”
BackgroundGutierrez-Romero, L., Blanco‐González, E., & Montes‐Bayón, M. (2023) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02506 · Cited by 11
Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Reprogramming in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Metastasis
Frederick, M. I., Hovey, O. F. J., Kakadia, J. H., Shepherd, T. G., Li, S. S. ‐., & Heinemann, I. U. (2023) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100660 · Cited by 11
“Indeed, OVCAR8 cells are known to overexpress cell movement and migration-associated genes (46, 47), making them ideal for studying the metastasis process.”
BackgroundLoss of XIST lncRNA unlocks stemness and cellular plasticity in ovarian cancer
Naciri, I., Liang, M., Yang, Y., Karner, H. M., Lin, B., Ludena, M. D. L. A., Hanse, E. A., Lebron, A., Razorenova, O. V., Nicholas, D., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2418096121 · Cited by 10
Saha, S. S., Gentles, L., Bradbury, A., Brecht, D., Robinson, R., O'Donnell, R. L., Curtin, N. J., & Drew, Y. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13061420 · Cited by 10
“Several earlier studies have attempted to analyse the genomic/transcriptomic/histological sub-type characterisation of ovarian cancer cell lines or correlate with response to chemotherapy [12,22,23].”
Homayoun, M., Sajedi, N., & Soleimani, M. (2022) · Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.4103/1735-5362.335175 · Cited by 11
“Extensive studies on 39 ovarian cancer cell lines including OVCAR-3 have shown that PTEN and DACT1 tumor suppressor genes were the wild-type form (24).”
BackgroundRab11a promotes the malignant progression of ovarian cancer by inducing autophagy
Wang, Y., Ren, Y., Li, N., Zhao, J., & Zhao, S. (2022) · Genes & Genomics · doi:10.1007/s13258-022-01314-0 · Cited by 11
“1 3 A2780 cells were obtained from tumor tissues of unspecified histological classification, and their histological subtype was presumed to be endometrioid (Beaufort et al. 2014).”
BackgroundThree-Dimensional Collagen Topology Shapes Cell Morphology, beyond Stiffness
Chen, C., Ibrahim, Z., Marchand, M. F., Piolot, T., Kamboj, S., Carreiras, F., Yamada, A., Schanne‐Klein, M., Chen, Y., Lambert, A., et al. (2022) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00879 · Cited by 11
Gogola-Mruk, J., Marynowicz, W., Krawczyk, K., & Ptak, A. (2023) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/rep-22-0443 · Cited by 11
Ni, J., & Anping, N. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0248019 · Cited by 11
“To date, preclinical studies have demonstrated that combination of HDACi with conventional cytotoxic regimens could be effective for patients with relapsed ovarian cancer, which also resulted in a significant regression of lesion in xenograft model of high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) [23, 24].”
BackgroundAlarcón, P., Pérez, A. J., Toledo, K., Contreras, H., Ormazábal, V., Nova‐Lamperti, E., Aguayo, C. R., Salomón, C., & Zuñiga, F. A. (2023) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122166 · Cited by 10
Reimer, D., Boesch, M., Wolf, D. G. F., Marth, C., Sopper, S., Hatina, J., Altevogt, P., Parson, W., Hackl, H., & Zeimet, A. G. (2017) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.31186 · Cited by 10
Kour, S., Rana, S., Kubica, S. P., Kizhake, S., Ahmad, M., Muñoz-Trujillo, C., Klinkebiel, D. L., Singh, S., Mallareddy, J. R., Chandra, S., et al. (2022) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101890 · Cited by 10
“Next, to determine the relative potency of the SpiD7 and 19 to inhibit growth of HGSC cell lines (47, 48), we subjected them to a 3-day cell growth assay.”
MethodBagnoli, M., Nicoletti, R., Valitutti, M., Rizzo, A., Napoli, A., Montalvão-de-Azevedo, R., Tomassetti, A., & Mezzanzanica, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.923508 · Cited by 10
Kujawa, K. A., Zembala‐Nożyńska, E., Syrkis, J. P., Cortez, A. J., Kupryjańczyk, J., & Lisowska, K. M. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms232415994 · Cited by 10
“The OAW42 line is relatively popular and has been re-evaluated according to its originally quoted histological origin in several recent studies [29,30]; reviewed in [31].”
BackgroundA Cell-Autonomous Oncosuppressive Role of Human RNASET2 Affecting ECM-Mediated Oncogenic Signaling
Roggiani, F., Riva, C., Raspagliesi, F., Porta, G., Valli, R., Taramelli, R., Acquati, F., Mezzanzanica, D., & Tomassetti, A. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11020255 · Cited by 10
“The RNASET2-expressing OAW42 EOC cell line, displaying an epithelial morphology [18,19], was stably silenced for RNASET2 expression by RNA interference.”
BackgroundCoustets, M., Ladurantie, C., Bellard, E., Prat, M., Rols, M., Ecochard, V., Ferron, G., Chabot, S., Golzio, M., & Paquereau, L. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119908 · Cited by 10
“Regarding EOC, the MUC16 glycoprotein and its circulating form (CA125) are the standard FDA approved biomarkers.”
BackgroundInfluentialHamala, V., Martišová, A., Šťastná, L. Č., Karban, J., Dančo, A., Šimarek, A., Lamač, M., Horáček, M., Kolářová, T., Hrstka, R., et al. (2020) · Applied Organometallic Chemistry · doi:10.1002/aoc.5896 · Cited by 10
Heinze, K., Kritsch, D., Mosig, A. S., Dürst, M., Häfner, N., & Runnebaum, I. B. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19010253 · Cited by 10
“Cell line authentication was done by STR profiling in September 2014 and February 2016 and revealed the correct identity depicted by a 97 % and 100 % match for A2780 and SKOV3 (ICLAC Match Criteria Worksheet [44]) compared to STR reference profiles (ATCC and [45]).”
ResultHollis, R. L., Elliott, R. J. R., Dawson, J. C., Ilenkovan, N., Matthews, R., Stillie, L. J., Oswald, A. J., Kim, H. H., Llauradó, M., Churchman, M., et al. (2024) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.029 · Cited by 9
“HOC7 is known to harbour a KRAS G12A mutation (table S1), as previously described [21].”
BackgroundDistinct effects of sacituzumab govitecan and berzosertib on DNA damage response in ovarian cancer
Nair, J. R., Huang, T., Sunkara, A. D., Pruitt, M. R., Ibanez, K. R., Chiang, C.-Y., Cheng, K. C.-C., Wilson, K. M., Cardillo, T. M., Hofsess, S. J., et al. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111283 · Cited by 9
“18 The linker allows the intra-tumoral release of therapeutic concentrations of iScience Article ll OPEN ACCESS SN-38, as well as extracellular release within the surrounding tumor microenvironment, providing a bystander effect.”
Liang, S., Liu, Y.-Y., He, J., Gao, T. M., Li, L., & He, S. (2022) · Bioengineered · doi:10.1080/21655979.2022.2064652 · Cited by 9
Mei, J., Tian, H., Huang, H.-S., Wu, N., Liou, Y., Chu, T., Wang, J., & Zhang, W. (2022) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2022.2109362 · Cited by 9
“Beaufort showed that p53 was considered the key gene in the transformation of ovarian cancer, and the mutations of myc, CCNE1 and TPX2 were also considered conditions for the transformation of ovarian cancer [31].”
BackgroundSuh, D. H., Park, W. H., Kim, M., Kim, K., No, J. H., & Kim, Y. B. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24021249 · Cited by 9
“Ovarian cancer is characterized by its heterogeneity [25].”
BackgroundResultKwon, J. E., Jang, Y., Yun, B. S., Kang, S., Kim, Y. H., Kim, B. G., & Cho, N. H. (2023) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1111/cpr.13582 · Cited by 9
“34 The roles of MET in ovarian CSC phenotype manifestation have not been studied.”
BackgroundMolecular insights into the transcriptional regulatory role of thyroid hormones in ovarian cancer
Shinderman‐Maman, E., Weingarten, C., Moskovich, D., Werner, H., Hercbergs, A. A., Davis, P. J., Ellis, M. H., & Ashur‐Fabian, O. (2017) · Molecular Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1002/mc.22735 · Cited by 9
The Effect of Olaparib and Bortezomib Combination Treatment on Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines
Berkel, Ç., Küçük, B., Usta, M., Yılmaz, E., & Çaçan, E. (2020) · European Journal of Biology · doi:10.26650/eurjbiol.2020.0035 · Cited by 9
Effects of trans‑(±)‑kusunokinin on chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells
Mad-adam, N., Rattanaburee, T., Tanawattanasuntorn, T., & Graidist, P. (2021) · Oncology Letters · doi:10.3892/ol.2021.13177 · Cited by 9
“A2780cis, SKOV‐3 and OVCAR‐3 are chemoresistant cells and are classified as EC, CC and HGSC in the epithelial ovarian cancer subtype, respectively (37,38).”
BackgroundPaucarmayta, A., Taitz, H., Casablanca, Y., Rodriguez, G. C., Maxwell, G. L., Darcy, K. M., & Syed, V. (2019) · Translational Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tcr.2019.07.36 · Cited by 9
RetractedCharacteristics of in vitro model systems for ovarian cancer studies
Tudrej, P., Kujawa, K. A., Cortez, A. J., & Lisowska, K. M. (2019) · Oncology in Clinical Practice · doi:10.5603/ocp.2019.0024 · Cited by 9
Smith, H. L., Willmore, E., Mukhopadhyay, A., Drew, Y., & Curtin, N. J. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14225559 · Cited by 9
“These two well-characterised ovarian cancer cell lines of differing molecular pathologies [20,21] were selected because four of the five PARPi used in this study are approved in ovarian ca cer.”
BackgroundRiffo, E. N., Palma, M. S., Hepp, M. I., Benítez-Riquelme, D., Torres, V. A., Castro, A. F., & Pincheira, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.1031262 · Cited by 8
“The A2780 ovarian cell line is associated with amoeboid migration, characterized by the ability tomove and invade independently of proteolysis by conferring increased motility and invasion of cells (Beaufort et al., 2014).”
BackgroundThree Dimensional Models of Endocrine Organs and Target Tissues Regulated by the Endocrine System
Luca, E., Zitzmann, K., Bornstein, S. R., Kugelmeier, P., Beuschlein, F., Nölting, S., & Hantel, C. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15184601 · Cited by 10
Serum starvation-based method of ovarian cancer cell dormancy induction and termination in vitro
Rutecki, S., Leśniewska-Bocianowska, A., Chmielewska, K., Matuszewska, J., Naumowicz, E., Uruski, P., Radziemski, A., Mikuła‐Pietrasik, J., Tykarski, A., & Książek, K. (2023) · Biology Methods and Protocols · doi:10.1093/biomethods/bpad029 · Cited by 8
“…results obtained using primary EOC cell cultures (high-grade serous histotype) and three established cell lines (A2780, OVCAR-3, and SKOV-3) differing in their genetic signatures (including P53 status), histological origin (endometrioid, clear cell, high-grade serous), and aggressiveness [22, 23].”
BackgroundKaur, K., Sanghu, J., Memarzadeh, S., & Jewett, A. (2024) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines12060677 · Cited by 8
“…of peripheral blood-derived NK cells with a combination of IL-2 and anti-CD16 mAbs, and co-culturing of activated NK cells with osteoclasts (OCs) as feeder cells in the presence of probiotics sAJ2, this process leads to expansion and highly functional activation of NK cells [103,128,129].”
BackgroundChoi, J. I., Park, S. H., Lee, H., Lee, D. W., & Lee, H. N. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155052 · Cited by 8
“reported that the putative histology of SKOV3 was an endometrioid or clear cell type, the original histology is also a serous type [29].”
BackgroundKapka‐Skrzypczak, L., Popek-Marciniec, S., Sawicki, K., Wolińska, E., Czajka, M., & Skrzypczak, M. (2016) · Oncology Letters · doi:10.3892/ol.2016.4795 · Cited by 8
Novel glycolipid agents for killing cisplatin-resistant human epithelial ovarian cancer cells
Moraya, A. I., Ali, J. L., Samadder, P., Liang, L., Morrison, L. C., Werbowetski‐Ogilvie, T. E., Ogunsina, M. O., Schweizer, F., Arthur, G., & Nachtigal, M. W. (2017) · Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13046-017-0538-9 · Cited by 8
“There are few reliable models of drug-resistant EOC cells available for research [7, 12, 29].”
BackgroundGarrido, M. P., Vallejos, C., Girardi, S., Gabler, F., Selman, A., López‐Moncada, F., Vega, M., & Romero, C. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23042124 · Cited by 8
Akbarzadeh, M., Majidinia, M., Aval, S. F., Mahbub, S., & Zarghami, N. (2018) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.31557/apjcp.2018.19.12.3473 · Cited by 8
“Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most lethal form in the world and OVCAR-3 cell line is a highly metastatic and drug-resistant human carcinoma cell line, thus it is an appropriate model system to study the effect and mechanisms of various anticancer agents (Beaufort et al., 2014).”
BackgroundDiscovery of Steroidal Lactam Conjugates of POPAM-NH 2 With Potent Anticancer Activity
Trafalis, D. T., Dalezis, P., Geromichalou, E. G., Sagredou, S., Sflakidou, E., Voura, M., Grammatikopoulou, M., Gabriel, C., & Sarli, V. (2019) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc-2019-0255 · Cited by 8
Advancing 3D Spheroid Research through 3D Scaffolds Made by Two-Photon Polymerization
Vitkūnaitė, E., Žymantaitė, E., Mlynska, A., Andrijec, D., Limanovskaja, K., Kaszynski, G., Matulis, D., Šakalys, V., & Jonušauskas, L. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11090902 · Cited by 8
“Said cell lines exhibit a different genetic background, morphology [49], and ability to form 3D cell cultures in a scaffold-free environment.”
BackgroundSmith, L. E., Padilla, J. L., Licor, A., Steinkamp, M. P., Lagutina, I. V., Guo, Y. P., Devor, E. J., Pankratz, V. S., Sallmyr, A., Oyebamiji, O., et al. (2025) · Translational Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102522 · Cited by 7
“COV362 cells are an endometrioid subtype of high-grade serous ovarian adenocarcinoma with the missense mutation Y220C in p53 [36].”
Single-cell characterization of step-wise acquisition of carboplatin resistance in ovarian cancer
Wenzel, A. T., Champa, D., Venkatesh, H., Sun, S., Tsai, C., Mesirov, J. P., Bui, J. D., Howell, S. B., & Harismendy, O. (2022) · npj Systems Biology and Applications · doi:10.1038/s41540-022-00230-z · Cited by 10
“Additionally, CAOV3 has been unambiguously characterized as a serous ovarian cancer cell line in contrast to other models of platinum resistance such as A2780 27 .”
ResultPirone, D., Cavina, B., Sirico, D. G., Mugnano, M., Bianco, V., Miccio, L., Perrone, A. M., Porcelli, A. M., Gasparre, G., Kurelac, I., et al. (2024) · Advanced Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/aisy.202400390 · Cited by 7
Wang, L., Chen, Y. X., Li, H., Xu, Q., & Liu, R. (2021) · Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/fcp.12709 · Cited by 7
“Six ovarian cancer cell lines are derived from patients with different disease stages and molecular subtypes, but all are epithelial morphology [13].”
BackgroundPetersen, E. K., Bue, M., Harlev, C., Jørgensen, A. R., Schmedes, A., Hanberg, P., Petersen, L. K., & Stilling, M. (2022) · Pleura and Peritoneum · doi:10.1515/pp-2022-0110 · Cited by 7
Marolt, N., Pavlič, R., Kreft, T., Gjorgoska, M., & Rižner, T. L. (2024) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117069 · Cited by 7
Teng, P.-N., Bateman, N. W., Wang, G., Litzi, T. A., Blanton, B. E., Hood, B. L., Conrads, K. A., Ao, W., Oliver, K., Darcy, K. M., et al. (2017) · Human Cell · doi:10.1007/s13577-017-0162-1 · Cited by 7
“Overexpressed genes in the spindle-like cluster are associated with cell movement, invasion and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) [17].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLi, L., Bai, H., Yang, J., Cao, D., & Shen, K. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.14767 · Cited by 7
“com/oncotarget with predominant expression of mesenchymal markers [37].”
BackgroundPark, J.-W., Kim, S. M., Lee, S. Y., Park, S.-W., & Kim, J. (2024) · Molecular & Cellular Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s13273-024-00451-9 · Cited by 6
“These cells are resistant to tumor necrosis factor and other cytotoxic drugs such as diph-theria toxin, cisplatin, and adriamycin (Beaufort et al. 2014; Ramalingam 2016).”
VERU-111, an orally available tubulin inhibitor, suppresses ovarian tumor growth and metastasis
Waddell, S., Zhao, G., Liu, Z., Chen, H., Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Miller, D. D., Yue, J., & Li, W. (2024) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.124.002298 · Cited by 6
“SKOV3 is representative of nonserous ovarian carcinoma subtypes, which account for 25% of epithelial ovarian cancers (Domcke et al, 2013; Beaufort et al, 2014).”
Shen, Y. T., Wang, L. L., Evans, J. C., Allen, C. J., & Piquette‐Miller, M. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20102498 · Cited by 6
“However, recent analyses of these cell lines demonstrate genetic and histological deviations from that which is seen clinically [13,14].”
BackgroundMa, S., Zheng, Y., & Fei, C. (2020) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2020-0668 · Cited by 6
Park, S., Kim, L. K., Kim, Y. T., Heo, T., & Kim, H. J. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12123626 · Cited by 6
“The subtypes of the epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines are as follows: SKOV3, serous; TOV112D, endometrioid; A2780, non-specified; OVCAR3, carcinoma; OVCA429, serous; and OVCA433, serous [29].”
BackgroundDuda, J. M., Twigg, C. A. I., & Thomas, S. N. (2022) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.202100372 · Cited by 6
“CAOV3 cells uniquely contain an EGFR mutation that is not found in the other two cell lines in this analysis [33].”
BackgroundForlani, L., Cecco, L. D., Simeon, V., Paolini, B., Bagnoli, M., Cecere, S. C., Spina, A., Citeroni, E., Bignotti, E., Lorusso, D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13046-023-02651-y · Cited by 7
“6 A Western blotting for EGFR and AXL expressions in lysates from OC cell lines representative of HGSOCs or non-HGSOCs cell lines [34].”
BackgroundClinical importance of the EMSY gene expression and polymorphisms in ovarian cancer
Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, A., Szafron, L. M., Moes-Sosnowska, J., Kulińczak, M., Balcerak, A., Konopka, B., Kulesza, M., Budziłowska, A., Łukasik, M., Piekarska, U., et al. (2018) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.24878 · Cited by 6
“The differential response to the drug may be related to different genetic aberrations harbored by each of the cell lines [27, 28].”
BackgroundHeinze, K., Hölzer, M., Ungelenk, M., Gerth, M., Thomale, J., Heller, R., Morden, C. R., McManus, K. J., Mosig, A. S., Dürst, M., et al. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13030476 · Cited by 6
“Cell line authentication was done by STR profiling and revealed the correct identity depicted by 97% and 100% percent match for A2780 and OVCAR3 (ICLAC match criteria worksheet [38]) compared to STR reference profiles (ATCC and [35]).”
ResultTang, S., Sumitra, M. R., Kuo, Y.-C., Hsu, H.-L., Ansar, M., Huang, S., Lee, S., Wang, H.-J., Lawal, B., Wu, A. T. H., et al. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110445 · Cited by 6
Scalvini, L., Tagliazucchi, L., Elisi, G. M., Zappaterra, D., Moschella, M. G., Fantini, S., Aiello, D., Guerrini, R., Albanese, V., Pacifico, S., et al. (2025) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2025.118056 · Cited by 5
Kollara, A., Burt, B. D., Ringuette, M. J., & Brown, T. J. (2023) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2023.110634 · Cited by 5
Sengupta, D., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Sengupta, K. (2023) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells12050757 · Cited by 4
Marverti, G., Moschella, M. G., Belardo, A., Lamesta, M., Mercanile, G., Tagliazucchi, L., Aiello, D., Venturelli, A., Illuminati, D., Guerrini, R., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1477318 · Cited by 5
Matthews, B., Wong‐Brown, M. W., Liu, D., Yee, C., Dickson, K.-A., Schneider, J., Islam, S., Head, R. J., Martin, J. H., Ford, C. E., et al. (2024) · Molecular Therapy Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.omton.2024.200911 · Cited by 5
IMGN853 Induces Autophagic Cell Death in Combination Therapy for Ovarian Cancer
Chelariu-Raicu, A., Vu, T. C., Umamaheswaran, S., Stur, E., Hanjra, P., Han, Y., Hu, M., Lin, J., Lawson, B. C., Liu, J., et al. (2025) · Cancer Research Communications · doi:10.1158/2767-9764.crc-24-0215 · Cited by 5
“12] to represent the different subtypes of ovarian cancer in this study.”
Stulpinas, A., Imbrasaitė, A., Krestnikova, N., & Kalvelytė, A. V. (2020) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.89395 · Cited by 7
“Similar work was done with 100 ovarian cancer cell lines to make an OCCP panel where the cells were described [170].”
Result
Metadata
- Authors
- Beaufort, C. M., Helmijr, J. C. A., Piskorz, A. M., Hoogstraat, M., Ruigrok-Ritstier, K., Besselink, N., Murtaza, M., van IJcken, W. F. J., Heine, A. A. J., Smid, M., Koudijs, M. J., Brenton, J. D., Berns, E. M. J. J., & Helleman, J.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Berns, Els M. J. J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-09-17
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e103988
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4167545
- OpenAlex
- W2015030879
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 21
- FWCI
- 29.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2015-03-23)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK (15601)
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Keywords
- epithelial ovarian cancer, ovarian cancer cell lines, morphological subtypes, high-grade serous carcinoma, low-grade serous carcinoma, tumor heterogeneity, metastasis, prognosis, drug response, preclinical models
- MeSH terms
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, MicroRNAs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review