Cited by 65Intramuscular injections and effectsDiabetes Management and ResearchIntravenous Infusion Technology and Safety

Model Study of the Pressure Build-Up during Subcutaneous Injection

Open access
Thomsen, Maria, Hernandez-Garcia, Anier, Mathiesen, Joachim, Poulsen, Mette, Sørensen, Dan N., Tarnow, Lise, Feidenhans'l, Robert·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

In this study we estimate the subcutaneous tissue counter pressure during drug infusion from a series of injections of insulin in type 2 diabetic patients using a non-invasive method. We construct a model for the pressure evolution in subcutaneous tissue based on mass continuity and the flow laws of a porous medium. For equivalent injection forces we measure the change in the infusion rate between injections in air at atmospheric pressure and in tissue. From a best fit with our model, we then determine the flow permeability as well as the bulk modulus of the tissue, estimated to be of the order 10-11-10-10 m2 and 105 Pa, respectively. The permeability is in good agreement with reported values for adipose porcine tissue. We suggest our model as a general way to estimate the pressure build-up in tissue during subcutaneous injection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0104054

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Insulin may flow into the connective tissue septa that surround the adipose cells, remain within the surrounding layer of inflammatory tissue, and/or flow upward along the cannula shaft onto the skin surface.

    “Insulin may flow into the connective tissue septa that surround the adipose cells, remain within the surrounding layer of inflammatory tissue, and/or flow upward along the cannula shaft onto the skin surface.30,31”

    From Detailed Analysis of Insulin Absorption Variability and the Tissue Response to Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Catheter Implantation in Swine (2017) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results (page not available) say injected insulin distributes between fat lobules, and the Introduction describes connective tissue separating those lobules. The Discussion mentions back-flow through the injection channel. The paper does not describe insulin remaining in a surrounding layer of inflammatory tissue or flowing along a cannula shaft onto the skin surface. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Slow increases and abrupt decreases in insulin pump back pressure suggest that a bolus dose of insulin may accumulate within the layer of inflammatory tissue, distend the tissue, and then abruptly travel into adjacent tissue through a pathway with lower resistance.

    “Slow increases and abrupt decreases in insulin pump back pressure suggest that a bolus dose of insulin may accumulate within the layer of inflammatory tissue, distend the tissue, and then abruptly travel into adjacent tissue through a pathway with lower resistance.30”

    From Detailed Analysis of Insulin Absorption Variability and the Tissue Response to Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Catheter Implantation in Swine (2017) · cites this paper as [30]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable, 1 not checked. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]Aukland K, Reed R (1993) Interstitial-lymphatic mechanisms in the control of extracellular fluid volume. Physiological reviews 73: 1– 78. 8419962
  2. [2]Agache P, Humbert P (2004) Measuring the skin. Springer.
  3. [3]Vardar B, Kızılcı S (2007) Incidence of lipohypertrophy in diabetic patients and a study of influencing factors. Diabetes research and clinical practice 77: 231– 236. 17303282
  4. [5]Omar MA, El-Kafoury AA, El-Araby RI (2011) Lipohypertrophy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and the associated factors. BMC research notes 4: 290. 21838879 PMC3186759
  5. [6]De Coninck C, Frid A, Gaspar R, Hicks D, Hirsch L, et al (2010) Results and analysis of the 2008–2009 insulin injection technique questionnaire survey. Journal of Diabetes 2: 168– 179. 20923482
  6. [7]Milan G, Murano I, Costa S, Pianta A, Tiengo C, et al (2010) Lipoatrophy induced by subcutaneous insulin infusion: ultrastructural analysis and gene expression profiling. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 95: 3126– 3132. 20484470
  7. [8]Peteiro-González D, Fernández-Rodríguez B, Araújo-Vilar D, et al (2011) Severe localized lipoatrophy related to therapy with insulin analogs in type 1a diabetes mellitus. Diabetes research and clinical practice 91: e61– e63. 21146887
  8. [9]Holstein A, Stege H, Kovacs P (2010) Lipoatrophy associated with the use of insulin analogues: a new case associated with the use of insulin glargine and review of the literature. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 9: 225– 231. 20001763
  9. [10]Johansson UB, Amsberg S, Hannerz L, Wredling R, Adamson U, et al (2005) Impaired absorption of insulin aspart from lipohypertrophic injection sites. Diabetes Care 28: 2025– 2027. 16043749
  10. [11]Gentile S, Agrusta M, Guarino G, Carbone L, Cavallaro V, et al (2011) Metabolic consequences of incorrect insulin administration techniques in aging subjects with diabetes. Acta diabetologica 48: 121– 125. 20091324
  11. [13]Wiig H, Rubin K, Reed RK (2003) New and active role of the interstitium in control of interstitial fluid pressure: potential therapeutic consequences. Acta Anaesthesiological Scandinavica 47: 111– 121. 12631039
  12. [14]Stranden E, Myhre H (1982) Pressure-volume recordings of human subcutaneous tissue: a study in patients with edema following arterial reconstruction for lower limb atherosclerosis. Microvascular research 24: 241– 248. 7154982
  13. [15]Patte C, Pleus S, Wiegel C, Schiltges G, Jendrike N, et al (2013) Effect on infusion rate and indwelling time on tissue resistance pressure in small-volume subcutaneous infusion like in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 15: 289– 294. 23427865
  14. [16]Pearson TL (2010) Practical aspects of insulin pen devices. Journal of diabetes science and technology 4: 522– 531. 20513316 PMC2901027
  15. [17]Wielandt JO, Niemeyer M, Hansen MR, Bucher D, Thomsen NB (2011) An assessment of dose accuracy and injection force of a novel prefilled insulin pen: comparison with a widely used prefilled insulin pen. Expert opinion on drug delivery 8: 1271– 1276. 21883036
  16. [18]Heinemann L (2013) Insulin pens and new ways of insulin delivery. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 15: S– 48. 23441708
  17. [19]Thomsen M, Poulsen M, Bech M, Velroyen A, Herzen J, et al (2012) Visualization of subcutaneous insulin injections by x-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 57: 7191– 7203. 23060123
  18. [21]Wang H (2000) Theory of linear poroelasticity with applications to geomechanics and hydrogeology. Princeton University Press.
  19. [22]Johnsen Ø, Toussaint R, Måløy KJ, Flekkøy EG (2006) Pattern formation during air injection into granular materials confined in a circular Hele-Shaw cell. Physical Review E 74(1) 011301.. 16907083
  20. [23]McGill R, Tukey JW, Larsen WA (1978) Variations of box plots. The American Statistician 32(1): 12– 16.
  21. [24]Comley KSC (2010) The mechanical properties of adipose tissue. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Emmanuel Collage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomsen, M., Hernandez-Garcia, A., Mathiesen, J., Poulsen, M., Sørensen, D. N., Tarnow, L., & Feidenhans'l, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • Steno Diabetes Centers (DK)
Corresponding author
Thomsen, Maria
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-08-14
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
e104054
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993873316
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Villum Fonden (00007172)
  • Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
Keywords
subcutaneous injection, pressure buildup, insulin infusion, type 2 diabetes, subcutaneous tissue, porous media flow, tissue permeability, bulk modulus, mass continuity, infusion rate, adipose tissue
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Male, Permeability, Pressure, Swine, Subcutaneous Tissue, Subcutaneous Fat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review