Pregnancy after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions in a Retrospective Matched Cohort
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatments for precancerous cervical lesions were associated with lower pregnancy rates compared to rates in unexposed women and women who had a diagnostic cervical biopsy or colposcopy. DESIGN: Matched, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW), an integrated healthcare delivery system in Oregon and Washington. PATIENTS: Women 14 to 53 years old with KPNW enrollment during the period 1998 through 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pregnancy after exposure or index date. Pregnancy was defined using a validated algorithm and electronic medical records data. RESULTS: We observed 570 pregnancies following cervical treatment in 4,137 women, 1,533 pregnancies following a diagnostic procedure in 13,767 women, and 7,436 pregnancies in a frequency-matched sample of 81,435 women unexposed to treatment or diagnostic procedures. After adjusting for age and contraceptive use, we observed a higher rate of pregnancies in the treatment group compared to unexposed women (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-1.55), but no difference in pregnancy rates between the treatment and diagnostic procedure groups (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.93-1.13). CONCLUSIONS: No adverse effects of cervical procedures on subsequent rates of pregnancy were observed in this cohort with up to twelve years of follow-up time.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two cohort studies in North America assessed pregnancy rates following ablative treatment, showing either increased pregnancy rates for grouped ablative procedures including thermal cautery, or no significant effect for laser treatment and cryotherapy.
“More recently, two cohort studies in North America assessed pregnancy rates following ablative treatment, showing either increased pregnancy rates for grouped ablative procedures, including thermal cautery [24], or no significant effect for laser treatment and cryotherapy [15].”
From Fertility and Miscarriage Incidence After Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Treatment by Thermal Ablation: A Cohort Study (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Kyrgiou, M., Koliopoulos, G., Martin-Hirsch, P., Arbyn, M., Prendiville, W., & Paraskevaidis, E. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68181-6 · Cited by 1,120 · see citing works
Arbyn, M., Kyrgiou, M., Simoens, C., Raifu, A. O., Koliopoulos, G., Martin-Hirsch, P., Prendiville, W., & Paraskevaidis, E. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a1284 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Martin-Hirsch, P. P., Paraskevaidis, E., Bryant, A., & Dickinson, H. O. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001318.pub3 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Jørgensen, K. J. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Invasive cervical cancer after conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Soutter, W. P., Lopes, A. D. B., FLETCHER, A. E., Monaghan, J., Duncan, I. D., Paraskevaidis, E. A., & Kitchener, H. C. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)08295-5 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Efficacy and safety of large-loop excision of the transformation zone
Bigrigg, A., Haffenden, D. K., Read, M. D., Codling, B. W., & Sheehan, A. L. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90881-8 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
The role of co-factors in the progression from human papillomavirus infection to cervical cancer
Luhn, P., Walker, J. L., Schiffman, M., Zuna, R. E., Dunn, S. T., Gold, M. A., Smith, K., Mathews, C. A., Allen, R. A., Zhang, R., et al. (2012) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.003 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Martin‐Hirsch, P. L., Paraskevaidis, E. A., Bryant, A., Dickinson, H. O., & Keep, S. L. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001318.pub2 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Hornbrook, M. C., Whitlock, E. P., Berg, C. J., Callaghan, W. M., Bachman, D. J., Gold, R. B., Bruce, F. C., Dietz, P. M., & Williams, S. B. (2006) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00635.x · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Jensen, K. E., Schmiedel, S., Norrild, B., Frederiksen, K., Iftner, T., & Kjær, S. K. (2012) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.513 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Treatment outcomes for squamous intraepithelial lesions
Nuovo, J., Melnikow, J. A., Willan, A. R., & Chan, B. K. S. (1999) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(99)00162-9 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Martin-Hirsch, P. P., Paraskevaidis, E. A., & Kitchener, H. C. (1999) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001318 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
The outcome of pregnancy after CO2 laser conisation of the cervix
Hagen, B., & Skjeldestad, F. E. (1993) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14261.x · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Pregnancy complications following conization of the uterine cervix (i)
Weber, T., & OBEL, E. B. (1979) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.3109/00016347909154045 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
The Fertility of Women After Cervical Laser Surgery
SPITZER, M. (1995) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00237-l · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Pattern of CIN recurrence following laser ablation treatment: long-term follow-up
Chew, G. K., Jandial, L., Paraskevaidis, E. A., & Kitchener, H. C. (1999) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1438.1999.99066.x · Cited by 33 · see citing works
PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING CONIZATION OF THE UTERINE CERVIX (II)
Weber, T., & OBEL, E. B. (1979) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.3109/00016347909154594 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF CERVICAL PRE‐CANCER*
McLaren, P. H. C. (1967) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1967.tb03980.x · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Impact of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future fertility.
Turlington, W. T., Wright, B., & Powell, J. L. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Fertility after cryosurgery of the cervix.
Weed, J. C., Curry, S., Duncan, I. D., Parker, R. T., & Creasman, W. (1978) · PubMed · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [8]McLaren J (1967) Conservative management of cervical precancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonwealth 74: 487– 492 6033269
- [10]Coppleson M, Atkinson KH, Dalrymple JC (1992) Cervical squamous and glandular intraepithelial neoplasia: clinical features and review of management In Coppleson M, Monaghan JM, Morrow CP Tattersall MHN, editors. Gynecologic Oncology. Edinburgh: Churchill and Livingston pp. 590– 595.
- [16]Hagen B, Skieldestad FE (1993) The outcome of pregnancy after laser conization of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100: 717– 720. 8399008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kyrgiou, M., Athanasiou, A., Paraskevaidi, M., Mitra, A., Kalliala, I., Martin-Hirsch, P., Arbyn, M., Bennett, P., & Paraskevaidis, E. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i3633 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Kyrgiou, M., Athanasiou, A., Kalliala, I. E. J., Paraskevaidi, M., Mitra, A., Martin‐Hirsch, P. L., Arbyn, M., Bennett, P. R., & Paraskevaidis, E. A. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012847 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Sasieni, P., Castanon, A., Landy, R., Kyrgiou, M., Kitchener, H., Quigley, M., Poon, L., Shennan, A., Hollingworth, A., Soutter, W., et al. (2016) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13839 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Pregnancy Outcomes after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions: An Observational Study
Weinmann, S. A., Naleway, A. L., Swamy, G. K., Krishnarajah, G., Arondekar, B. V., Fernandez, J. L., & Myers, E. R. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165276 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationThermocoagulation versus cryotherapy for the treatment of cervical precancers
Duan, L., Du, H., Belinson, J. L., Liu, Z., Xiao, A., Liu, S., Zhao, L., Wang, C., Qu, X., & Wu, R. (2020) · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · doi:10.1111/jog.14520 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Kyrgiou, M., Athanasiou, A., Paraskevaidi, M., Mitra, A., Kalliala, I. E. J., Martin‐Hirsch, P. L., Arbyn, M., Bennett, P. R., & Paraskevaidis, E. A. (2016) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/01.ogx.0000508341.95858.c5 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Firichenko, S. V., Stark, M. M., & Mynbaev, O. A. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99185-0 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Balan, T. A., Balan, R. A., Socolov, D. G., Gheorghita, V., Buţureanu, T., Păvăleanu, I., Coșovanu, E. T., & Căruntu, I.-D. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13226718 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Wisniak, A., Yakam, V., Bolo, S. E., Moukam, A., Sormani, J., Vassilakos, P., Kenfack, B., & Petignat, P. (2025) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17954 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Hay, R., & Patterson, J. (2018) · New Zealand College of Midwives · doi:10.12784/nzcomjnl54.2018.3.22-29 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Kenfack, B., Tanekeu, C.-A., Ajong, A. B., KENFACK, Z. B. G., Petignat, P., & Tebeu, P. M. (2024) · Advances in Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.4236/arsci.2024.121005 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Firichenko, S. V., Stark, M. M., & Mynbaev, O. A. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-468727/v1
Chen, R., Wang, C., & Li, B. (2025) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.18144
Lesão intraepitelial de alto grau na gravidez: condutas e achados durante a gravidez e pós-parto
Arruda, V. D. O., & Neto, A. B. (2021) · Femina · doi:10.61622/0100-725449902110
- Authors
- Naleway, A. L., Weinmann, S., Krishnarajah, G., Arondekar, B., Fernandez, J., Swamy, G., & Myers, E.
- Affiliations
- Kaiser Permanente (US)
- GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Naleway, Allison L.
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-02-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e0117525
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4324989
- OpenAlex
- W1977764059
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Kaiser Permanente
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- cervical precancerous lesions, pregnancy rate, cervical treatment, colposcopy, contraceptive use, reproductive outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Precancerous Conditions, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Pregnancy Rate, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review