Cited by 139Coastal and Marine ManagementSustainable Development and Environmental PolicyMarine and fisheries research

Patterns and Emerging Trends in Global Ocean Health

Open access
Halpern, Benjamin S., Longo, Catherine, Lowndes, Julia S. Stewart, Best, Benjamin D., Frazier, Melanie, Katona, Steven K., Kleisner, Kristin M., Rosenberg, Andrew A. +2 more·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

International and regional policies aimed at managing ocean ecosystem health need quantitative and comprehensive indices to synthesize information from a variety of sources, consistently measure progress, and communicate with key constituencies and the public. Here we present the second annual global assessment of the Ocean Health Index, reporting current scores and annual changes since 2012, recalculated using updated methods and data based on the best available science, for 221 coastal countries and territories. The Index measures performance of ten societal goals for healthy oceans on a quantitative scale of increasing health from 0 to 100, and combines these scores into a single Index score, for each country and globally. The global Index score improved one point (from 67 to 68), while many country-level Index and goal scores had larger changes. Per-country Index scores ranged from 41-95 and, on average, improved by 0.06 points (range -8 to +12). Globally, average scores increased for individual goals by as much as 6.5 points (coastal economies) and decreased by as much as 1.2 points (natural products). Annual updates of the Index, even when not all input data have been updated, provide valuable information to scientists, policy makers, and resource managers because patterns and trends can emerge from the data that have been updated. Changes of even a few points indicate potential successes (when scores increase) that merit recognition, or concerns (when scores decrease) that may require mitigative action, with changes of more than 10-20 points representing large shifts that deserve greater attention. Goal scores showed remarkably little covariance across regions, indicating low redundancy in the Index, such that each goal delivers information about a different facet of ocean health. Together these scores provide a snapshot of global ocean health and suggest where countries have made progress and where a need for further improvement exists.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0117863

Cites

17 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 66% of ocean surface is experiencing increasing cumulative impacts.

    “66% of ocean surface is experiencing increasing cumulative impacts ( 20 )”

    From Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change (2019) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results and Discussion report changes in Ocean Health Index scores, not the proportion of ocean surface experiencing increasing cumulative impacts. Searches for “66%,” “cumulative impacts,” and ocean surface area found no passage supporting the claimed figure in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Halpern BS, Gaines S, Kleisner K, Longo C, Pauly D, Rosenberg AA, et al Reply to Branch et al. Nature 2013; 495: E7 10.1038/nature11974 23538835 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halpern, B. S., Longo, C., Lowndes, J. S. S., Best, B. D., Frazier, M., Katona, S. K., Kleisner, K. M., Rosenberg, A. A., Scarborough, C., & Selig, E. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Conservation International (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Union of Concerned Scientists (US)
Corresponding author
Halpern, Benjamin S.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-03-16
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
e0117863
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163939760
Cited by
139
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
38.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  • Oak Foundation
  • National Geographic Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
Ocean Health Index, ocean health, marine ecosystem health, coastal countries, marine policy, coastal economy, natural products
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Fisheries, Oceans and Seas, Ecosystem, Internationality, Ecological and Environmental Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review