Cited by 120Marine and fisheries researchCoastal and Marine ManagementMaritime Security and History

Euros vs. Yuan: Comparing European and Chinese Fishing Access in West Africa

Open access
Belhabib, Dyhia, Sumaila, U. Rashid, Lam, Vicky W. Y., Zeller, Dirk, Le Billon, Philippe, Abou Kane, Elimane, Pauly, Daniel·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

We compare the performance of European Union (EU) and Chinese fisheries access agreements with West African countries in terms of illegal and unreported fishing, economic equity, and patterns of exploitation. Bottom-up re-estimations of catch reveal that the EU (1.6 million t•year(-1)) and China (2.3 million t•year(-1)) report only 29% and 8%, respectively, of their estimated total catches (including estimated discards whenever possible) from West African countries between 2000 and 2010. EU catches are declining, while Chinese catches are increasing and are yet to reach the historic maximum level of EU catches (3 million t•year(-1) on average in the 1970s-1980s). The monetary value of EU fishing agreements, correlated in theory with reported catches, is straightforward to access, in contrast to Chinese agreements. However, once quantified, the value of Chinese agreements is readily traceable within the African economy through the different projects they directly cover, in contrast to the funds disbursed [to host governments] by the EU. Overall, China provides resources equivalent to about 4% of the ex-vessel value [value at landing] of the catch taken by Chinese distant-water fleets from West African waters, while the EU pays 8%. We address the difficulties of separating fees directly related to fishing from other economic or political motivations for Chinese fees, which could introduce a bias to the present findings as this operation is not performed for EU access fees officially related to fishing. Our study reveals that the EU and China perform similarly in terms of illegal fishing, patterns of exploitation and sustainability of resource use, while under-reporting by the EU increases and that by China decreases. The EU agreements provide, in theory, room for improving scientific research, monitoring and surveillance, suggesting a better performance than for Chinese agreements, but the end-use of the EU funds are more difficult, and sometime impossible to ascertain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0118351

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Governments of countries in the Gulf of Guinea take advantage of resource demands to generate more revenue without effectively monitoring the activities of fishing vessels from distant water nations.

    “Equally, the governments of the respective countries in the region take advantage of the resource demands to generate more revenue for their countries; however, they do so without taking into account their need to effectively monitor the activities of fishing vessels from those nations (Belhabib et al., 2015;Okafor-Yarwood, 2019;Okafor-Yarwood and Belhabib, 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. [2]Pauly D, Christensen V, Guenette S, Pitcher TJ, Sumaila UR, et al (2002) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418: 689– 695. 10.1038/nature01017 12167876 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [4]Sumaila UR, Khan AS, J DA, Watson R, Munro G, et al (2010) A bottom-up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies. Journal of Bioeconomics 2010: 201– 225. 10.1007/s10818-010-9091-8 · DOI
  3. [6]Pauly D, Belhabib D, Blomeyer R, Cheung WWWL, Cisneros-Montemayor AM, et al (2013) China's distant-water fisheries in the 21st century. Fish and Fisheries 15: 474– 488. 10.1111/faf.12032 · DOI
  4. [7]Kaczynski VM, Fluharty DL (2002) European policies in West Africa: who benefits from fisheries agreements? Marine Policy 26: 75– 93. 10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00039-2 · DOI
  5. [8]Iheduru CO (1995) The Political Economy of Euro-African Fishing Agreements. The Journal of Developing Areas 30: 63– 90.
  6. [11]Kaczynski VM (1989) Foreign fishing fleets in the subSaharan West African EEZ. The coastal state perspective. Marine Policy 13: 2– 15. 10.1016/0308-597X(89)90037-7 · DOI
  7. [12]Pauly D (2009) Beyond duplicity and ignorance in global fisheries. Scientia Marina 73: 215– 224. 10.3989/scimar.2009.73n2215 · DOI
  8. [13]Atta‐Mills J, Alder J, Rashid Sumaila U (2004). The decline of a regional fishing nation: the case of Ghana and West Africa. Natural Resources Forum 28: 13– 21. 10.1111/j.0165-0203.2004.00068.x · DOI
  9. [14]Pauly D, Chuenpagdee R (2003) Development of Fisheries in the Gulf of Thailand Large Marine Ecosystem: Analysis of an Unplanned Experiment In: Hempel G, Sherman K, editors. Large Marine Ecosystems of the World 12: Change and Sustainability. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science 337– 354.
  10. [15]Chen C-J (2010) Fisheries subsidies under international law Hamburg: Springer. 256 p.
  11. [18]Arístegui J, Barton ED, Álvarez-Salgado XA, Santos AMP, Figueiras FG, et al (2009) Sub-regional ecosystem variability in the Canary Current upwelling. Progress in Oceanography 83: 33– 48. 10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.031 · DOI
  12. [19]Ukwe C, Ibe C, Alo B, Yumkella K (2003) Achieving a paradigm shift in environmental and living resources management in the Gulf of Guinea: the large marine ecosystem approach. Marine pollution bulletin 47: 219– 225. 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00473-3 12787623 · DOI
  13. [20]McGlade JM, Cury P, Koranteng KA, Hardman-Mountford NJ (2002) The Gulf of Guinea large marine ecosystem: Environmental forcing and sustainable development of marine resources; McGlade JM, Cury P, Koranteng KA, Hardman-Mountford NJ, editors. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  14. [21]Hutchings L, van der Lingen CD, Shannon LJ, Crawford RJM, Verheye HMS, et al (2009) The Benguela Current: An ecosystem of four components. Progress in Oceanography 83: 15– 32. 10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.046 · DOI
  15. [22]Goffinet T (1992) Development and fisheries management: The case of northwest Africa. Ocean & Coastal Management 17: 105– 136. 10.1016/0964-5691(92)90039-N · DOI
  16. [24]Kaczynski VM, Looney SW (2000) Coastal Resources as an Engine of Economic Growth and Reduction of Poverty in West Africa: Policy Considerations. Coastal Management 28: 235– 248. 10.1080/089207500408647 · DOI
  17. [25]Agnew DJ, Pearce J, Pramod G, Peatman T, Watson R, et al (2009) Estimating the Worldwide Extent of Illegal Fishing. PLOS ONE 4: e4570 10.1371/journal.pone.0004570 19240812 PMC2646833 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [26]Alder J, Sumaila UR (2004) Western Africa: A Fish Basket of Europe Past and Present. The Journal of Environment & Development 13: 156– 178. 10.1177/1070496504266092 · DOI
  19. [33]Ndiaye TM (2011) Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing: Responses in General and in West Africa. Chinese Journal of International Law 10: 373– 405. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmr012 · DOI
  20. [35]Ilnyckyj M (2007) The legality and sustainability of European Union fisheries policy in West Africa MIT International Review. 41 p.
  21. [36]Lamm A (2011) European Parliament Says No Review of Morocco Fisheries Agreement. Epoch Times. Available at http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/world/european-parliament-says-no-review-of-morocco-fisheries-agreement-62250.html. Accessed 2014 Jun 14.
  22. [38]Le Manach F, Andriamahefazafy M, Harper S, Harris A, Hosch G, et al (2012) Who gets what? Developing a more equitable framework for EU fishing agreements. Marine Policy 2012: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.001 · DOI
  23. [43]Belhabib D, Koutob V, Sall A, Lam VWY, Pauly D (2014) Fisheries catch misreporting and its implications: The case of Senegal. Fisheries Research 151: 1– 11. 10.1016/j.fishres.2013.12.006 · DOI
  24. [45]FAO (2006) Contribution of fisheries to national economies in West and Central Africa–Policies to increase the wealth generated by small-scale fisheries New Directions in Fisheries – A Series of Policy Briefs on Development Issues. Rome: FAO 16p. 10.1111/brv.12155 · DOI
  25. [49]Allison EH, Perry AL, Badjeck M-C, Neil Adger W, Brown K, et al (2009) Vulnerability of national economies to the impacts of climate change on fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 10: 173– 196. 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00310.x · DOI
  26. [50]Lam VWY, Cheung WWL, Swartz W, Sumaila UR (2012) Climate Change Impacts on Fisheries in West Africa: Implications for Economic, Food and Nutritional Security. African Journal of Marine Science 34: 103– 117. 10.2989/1814232X.2012.673294 · DOI
  27. [52]Kent G (1997) Fisheries, food security, and the poor. Food Policy 22: 393– 404. 10.1016/S0306-9192(97)00030-4 · DOI
  28. [56]Zeller D, Booth S, Davis G, Pauly D (2007) Re-estimation of small-scale fishery catches for U.S. flag-associated island areas in the western Pacific: the last 50 years. Fishery Bulletin 105: 266– 277.
  29. [57]Pauly D (1998) Rationale for reconstructing catch time series. EC Fisheries Cooperation Bulletin 11: 4– 7.
  30. [60]Watson R, Kitchingman A, Gelchu A, Pauly D (2004) Mapping global fisheries: sharpening our focus. Fish and Fisheries 5: 168– 177. 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2004.00142.x · DOI
  31. [61]Swartz W, Sumaila R, Watson R (2013) Global ex-vessel fish price database revisited: a new approach for estimating ‘missing’prices. Environmental and Resource Economics 56: 467– 480. 10.1007/s10640-012-9611-1 · DOI
  32. [66]Glaesel Frontani H, McCracken A (2012) China's development intitiatives in Ghana, 1961–2011. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa 14: 275– 286.
  33. [67]Mallory TG (2013) China's distant water fishing industry: Evolving policies and implications. Marine Policy 38: 99– 108. 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.024 · DOI
  34. [68]Ponte S, Raakjær J, Campling L (2007) Swimming Upstream: Market Access for African Fish Exports in the Context of WTO and EU Negotiations and Regulation. Development Policy Review 25: 113– 138. 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00362.x · DOI
  35. [72]Gascuel D, Zeller D, Taleb Sidi MO, Pauly D (2007) Reconstructed catches in the Mauritanian EEZ In: Zeller D, Pauly D, editors. Reconstruction of marine fisheries catches for key countries and regions (1950–2005). Vancouve (Canada)r: Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia pp. 105– 119.
  36. [80]Seto K, Belhabib D, Copeland D, Vakily JM, Seilert H, et al (2015) When fish is worth more than diamond: a Rreconstruction of Marine marine Fisheries fisheries Catches catches for Sierra Leone 1950–2010 In: Belhabib D, Pauly D, editors. Marine Fisheries Catches in West Africa, 1950–2010, Part II. Vancouver (Canada): Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia. In Press.
  37. [82]Belhabib D (2015) Côte d’Ivoire: fisheries catch reconstruction, 1950–2010 In: Belhabib D, Pauly D, editors. Marine Fisheries Catches in West Africa, 1950–2010, Part II. Vancouver (Canada): Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia. In Press.
  38. [84]Belhabib D, Koutob V, Pauly D (2015) The marine fisheries of Togo, the ‘Heart of West Africa’, 1950 to 2010 In: Belhabib D, Pauly D, editors. Marine Fisheries Catches in West Africa, 1950–2010, Part II. Vancouver (Canada): Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia. In Press.
  39. [85]Belhabib D, Pauly D (2015) Benin fisheries: a catch reconstruction, 1950–2010 In: Belhabib D, Pauly D, editors. Marine Fisheries Catches in West Africa, 1950–2010, Part II. Vancouver (Canada): Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia. In Press.
  40. [86]Etim L, Belhabib D, Pauly D (2015) An overview of the nigerian marine fisheries subsector and a re-evaluation of its catch data over the past 60 years (1950–2010) In: Belhabib D, Pauly D, editors. Marine Fisheries Catches in West Africa, 1950–2010, Part II. Vancouver (Canada): Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia. In Press.
  41. [87]Belhabib D, Hellebrandt D, Edward E, Zeller D, Pauly D (2015) Equatorial Guinean fisheries between 1950 and 2010: a catch reconstruction In: Belhabib D, Pauly D, editors. Marine Fisheries Catches in West Africa, 1950–2010, Part II. Vancouver (Canada): Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia. In Press.
  42. [88]Belhabib D (2015) Fisheries of Sao Tome and Principe, a catch reconstruction 1950–2010 In: Belhabib D, Pauly D, editors. Marine Fisheries Catches in West Africa, 1950–2010, Part II. Vancouver (Canada): Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia. In Press.
  43. [89]Belhabib D (2015) Gabon fisheries between 1950 and 2010: a catch reconstruction In: Belhabib D, Pauly D, editors. Marine Fisheries Catches in West Africa, 1950–2010, Part II. Vancouver (Canada): Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia. In Press.
  44. [90]Belhabib D, Pauly D (2015) The implications of miss-reporting on catch trends: a catch reconstruction for the Popular Republic of the Congo, 1950–2010 In: Belhabib D, Pauly D, editors. Marine Fisheries Catches in West Africa, 1950–2010, Part II. Vancouver (Canada): Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia. In Press
  45. [91]Belhabib D, Ramdeen S, Pauly D (2015) An attempt at reconstructing the marine fisheries catches in the Congo (ex-Zaïre), 1950 to 2010 Vancouver (Canada): Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia. In Press
  46. [97]Belhabib D, Pauly D (2015) Fisheries in troubled waters: a catch reconstruction for Guinea-Bissau,1950–2010 Vancouver (Canada): Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia. In Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belhabib, D., Sumaila, U. R., Lam, V. W. Y., Zeller, D., Le Billon, P., Abou Kane, E., & Pauly, D.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Belhabib, Dyhia
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-03-20
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
e0118351
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025641593
Cited by
120
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Pew Charitable Trusts
  • Paul G. Allen Family Foundation
  • MAVA Foundation
  • University of British Columbia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Maritime Security and History
Keywords
EU fisheries policy, West African fisheries, illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, discards, economic equity, sustainable fisheries
MeSH terms
Africa, Western, Animals, China, Costs and Cost Analysis, European Union, Fisheries, Fishes, Geography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review