Cited by 1,009Marine and fisheries researchMaritime Security and HistoryCoastal and Marine Management

Estimating the Worldwide Extent of Illegal Fishing

Open access
Agnew, David J., Pearce, John, Pramod, Ganapathiraju, Peatman, Tom, Watson, Reg, Beddington, John R., Pitcher, Tony J.·2009·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Illegal and unreported fishing contributes to overexploitation of fish stocks and is a hindrance to the recovery of fish populations and ecosystems. This study is the first to undertake a world-wide analysis of illegal and unreported fishing. Reviewing the situation in 54 countries and on the high seas, we estimate that lower and upper estimates of the total value of current illegal and unreported fishing losses worldwide are between $10 bn and $23.5 bn annually, representing between 11 and 26 million tonnes. Our data are of sufficient resolution to detect regional differences in the level and trend of illegal fishing over the last 20 years, and we can report a significant correlation between governance and the level of illegal fishing. Developing countries are most at risk from illegal fishing, with total estimated catches in West Africa being 40% higher than reported catches. Such levels of exploitation severely hamper the sustainable management of marine ecosystems. Although there have been some successes in reducing the level of illegal fishing in some areas, these developments are relatively recent and follow growing international focus on the problem. This paper provides the baseline against which successful action to curb illegal fishing can be judged.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0004570

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [15]Varkey DA Ainsworth CH Pitcher TJ Johanes G 2008 Estimating illegal and unreported catches in Raja Ampat Regency, Indonesia. Kalikoski D Pitcher TJ Assessing Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishery Catches (IUU): Some case studies Vancouver University of British Columbia 120 Fisheries Centre Research Reports. In press
  2. [17]Bray K 2000 A global review of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. Rome: FAO paper AUS:IUU/2000/6. Available: ftp://ftp.fao.org/fi/document/Ec-OpenRegistries/BRAY_AUS-IUU-2000-6.pdf. Accessed 24 November 2008
  3. [31]WWF 2007 Mid-Term Review of the EU Common Fisheries Policy Brussels (Belgium) World Wide Fund for Nature
  4. [44]Kalikoski D Pitcher TJ 2008 Assessing Illegal, Unreported And Unregulated Fishery Catches (IUU): Some case studies Vancouver University of British Columbia 120 Fisheries Centre Research Reports. In press
  5. [56]Willoughby N Monintja D Badrudin M 1997 Do Fisheries Statistics Give the Full Picture? Indonesia's Non-Recorded Fish Problem. Report of the Regional Workshop on the Precautionary Approach to Fishery Management Rome FAO Report BOPB/REP/82. Available: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/ad914e/ad914e02.pdf), pp. 163–172. Accessed September 2008
  6. [59]Taghavi SA 1999 Fisheries MCS in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Report of a regional workshop on fisheries monitoring, control and surveillance Rome FAO 67 74 GCP/INT/648/NOR Field Report C-3 (En)
  7. [65]Guénette S Balguerías E Santamaría MTG 2001 Spanish fishing activities along the Saharan and Moroccan coasts. Zeller D Watson R Pauly D Fisheries Impacts on North Atlantic Ecosystems: Catch, Effort and National/Regional Data Sets vol. 9(3) Vancouver Univ. British Columbia 206 213 Fisheries Centre Research Reports
  8. [66]Melnychuk M Guénette S Martín-Sosa P Balguerías E 2001 Fisheries in the Canary Islands, Spain. Zeller D Watson R Pauly D Fisheries Impacts on North Atlantic Ecosystems: Catch, Effort and National/Regional Data Sets vol. 9(3) Vancouver Univ. British Columbia 221 224 Fisheries Centre Research Reports
  9. [79]Morato T Guénette S Pitcher TJ 2002 Fisheries of the Azores (Portugal), 1982–1999. Zeller D Watson R Pauly D Fisheries Impacts on North Atlantic Ecosystems: Catch, Effort and National/Regional Data Sets vol. 9(3) Vancouver Univ. British Columbia 214 220 Fisheries Centre Research Reports
  10. [82]Flewweling P Hosch G 2006 Country review: Sri Lanka. De Young C Review of the State of the World Marine Capture Fisheries Management: Indian Ocean Rome FAO 163 174 FAO Tech Rep 488
  11. [83]Kuo CL 2001 Development and Management of Coastal Fisheries in Taiwan. Liao IC Baker J Aquaculture and Fisheries Resources Management Keelung Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute 241 248 Conference Proceedings Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute no. 4.
  12. [86]Morgan G 2006 Country review: Yemen. De Young C Review of the State of the World Marine Capture Fisheries Management: Indian Ocean Rome FAO 337 348 FAO Tech Rep 488
  13. [87]FAO 2007 Commodities 2005 FAO Yearbook of Fishery Statistics Vol. 101 Rome FAO 237

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agnew, D. J., Pearce, J., Pramod, G., Peatman, T., Watson, R., Beddington, J. R., & Pitcher, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Government of the United Kingdom (GB)
Corresponding author
Agnew, David J.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2009-02-25
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
e4570
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015918764
Cited by
1,009
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 38
FWCI
29.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
  • FIU - Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Pew Charitable Trusts
  • Department for International Development
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Maritime Security and History
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
Keywords
illegal fishing, fisheries governance, fish stock overexploitation, high seas fisheries, developing countries, marine ecosystem management, fisheries management
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Conservation of Natural Resources, Developing Countries, Fishes, Food Supply, International Cooperation, Jurisprudence, Oceans and Seas, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review