Cited by 44Wildlife Ecology and ConservationHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisData Management and Algorithms

Extending the functionality of behavioural change-point analysis with k-means clustering: A case study with the little penguin (Eudyptula minor)

Open access
Zhang, Jingjing, O’Reilly, Kathleen M., Perry, George L. W., Taylor, Graeme A., Dennis, Todd E.·2015·PLoS ONE

Abstract

We present a simple framework for classifying mutually exclusive behavioural states within the geospatial lifelines of animals. This method involves use of three sequentially applied statistical procedures: (1) behavioural change point analysis to partition movement trajectories into discrete bouts of same-state behaviours, based on abrupt changes in the spatio-temporal autocorrelation structure of movement parameters; (2) hierarchical multivariate cluster analysis to determine the number of different behavioural states; and (3) k-means clustering to classify inferred bouts of same-state location observations into behavioural modes. We demonstrate application of the method by analysing synthetic trajectories of known 'artificial behaviours' comprised of different correlated random walks, as well as real foraging trajectories of little penguins (Eudyptula minor) obtained by global-positioning-system telemetry. Our results show that the modelling procedure correctly classified 92.5% of all individual location observations in the synthetic trajectories, demonstrating reasonable ability to successfully discriminate behavioural modes. Most individual little penguins were found to exhibit three unique behavioural states (resting, commuting/active searching, area-restricted foraging), with variation in the timing and locations of observations apparently related to ambient light, bathymetry, and proximity to coastlines and river mouths. Addition of k-means clustering extends the utility of behavioural change point analysis, by providing a simple means through which the behaviours inferred for the location observations comprising individual movement trajectories can be objectively classified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0122811

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning can tackle a wide range of tasks, including classifying observations into predefined sets, clustering data into groups that share an underlying process, and regressing an outcome against multiple factors and elucidating their contributory effect.

    “ML can tackle a wide range of tasks, including classifying observations into predefined sets (Kabra, Robie, Rivera-Alba, Branson, & Branson, 2013), clustering data into groups that share an underlying process (Zhang, O'Reilly, Perry, Taylor, & Dennis, 2015) and regressing an outcome of interest against multiple factors and elucidating their contributory effect (Chesler, Wilson, Lariviere, Rodrig”

    From Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies (2017) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [34]Marchant S, Higgins PJ. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds; volume 1. Melbourne: Oxford Univeristy Press; 1990 p. 125
  2. [37]Mattern T. Foraging strategies and breeding success in the Little Penguin, Eudyptula minor: a comparative study between different habitats Otago [dissertation]. the University of Otago; 2001.
  3. [51]Chiaradia A. Breeding biology and feeding ecology of Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) at Phillip Island–a basis for a monitoring program [dissertation]. University of Tasmania; 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., O’Reilly, K. M., Perry, G. L. W., Taylor, G. A., & Dennis, T. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of Portland (US)
  • Department of Conservation (NZ)
Corresponding author
Dennis, Todd E.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2015-04-29
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
e0122811
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034868571
Cited by
44
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Auckland
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Data Management and Algorithms
Keywords
K-means clustering, animal movement trajectories, little penguin, Eudyptula minor, foraging behavior, resting behavior, spatiotemporal autocorrelation, GPS tracking, correlated random walk, ambient light, bathymetry, seabird behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Movement, Telemetry, Cluster Analysis, Geographic Information Systems, Spheniscidae, Animal Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review