Cited by 276Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

Orthogonalization of regressors in fMRI models

Open access
Mumford, Jeanette A., Poline, Jean-Baptiste, Poldrack, Russell A.·2015·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The occurrence of collinearity in fMRI-based GLMs (general linear models) may reduce power or produce unreliable parameter estimates. It is commonly believed that orthogonalizing collinear regressors in the model will solve this problem, and some software packages apply automatic orthogonalization. However, the effects of orthogonalization on the interpretation of the resulting parameter estimates is widely unappreciated or misunderstood. Here we discuss the nature and causes of collinearity in fMRI models, with a focus on the appropriate uses of orthogonalization. Special attention is given to how the two popular fMRI data analysis software packages, SPM and FSL, handle orthogonalization, and pitfalls that may be encountered in their usage. Strategies are discussed for reducing collinearity in fMRI designs and addressing their effects when they occur.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0126255

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • None of the predictors was orthogonalised.

    “all predictors were convolved with the double-gamma haemodynamic response function and none of them was orthogonalised (Mumford et al., 2015).”

    From Are prediction error modifications domain specific in autism but domain general in ADHD? (2025) · cites this paper as Mumford et al., 2015

    The Conclusions and Discussion (page unavailable) say orthogonalization often confuses interpretation and should be used only when it improves interpretation, supporting a rationale for leaving predictors unorthogonalized. The paper does not establish whether the citing study actually orthogonalized any of its predictors. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The study employed a block design, which inherently introduces issues of collinearity.

    “Third, we employed a block design, which inherently introduces issues of collinearity (Mumford et al., 2015).”

    From Neural correlates of emotion acceptance<i>vs</i>worry or suppression in generalized anxiety disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Mumford et al., 2015

    The Introduction explains how timing in an fMRI experiment can make regressors highly correlated, and Methods > Avoiding collinearity discusses reducing collinearity through study planning. These passages support the general concern about design-related collinearity, but do not say that a block design inherently introduces it. No page numbers are provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mumford, J. A., Poline, J.-B., & Poldrack, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Mumford, Jeanette A.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2015-04-28
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
e0126255
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013974533
Cited by
276
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 2
FWCI
15.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
orthogonalization, multicollinearity, parameter estimation, statistical power, SPM, FSL, design matrix
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Theoretical, Reaction Time, Regression Analysis, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review