CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pre-Columbian Floristic Legacies in Modern Homegardens of Central Amazonia

Lins, Juliana, Lima, Helena P., Baccaro, Fabricio B., Kinupp, Valdely F., Shepard, Glenn H., Clement, Charles R.·2015·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0127067PMC PMC4451503
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0127067

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Charcoal from pre-contact burning events that occurred centuries apart suggests there were multiple occupations within the region before European colonization.

    “Charcoal from pre-contact burning events that occurred centuries apart suggests there were multiple occupations within the region before European colonization, aligning with patterns seen in other Amazonian studies”

    From Pre‐contact and post‐colonial ecological legacies shape Surinamese rainforests (2024) · cites this paper as Lins et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. CR Clement, 1999, 1492 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources. I. The relation between domestication and human population decline, Economic Botany, 53, 188, 10.1007/BF02866498 · DOI
  2. P Kareiva, 2007, Domesticated Nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare, Science, 316, 1866, 10.1126/science.1140170 · DOI · Paper page
  3. DR Piperno, 2011, The origins of plant cultivation and domestication in the New World Tropics, Current Anthropology, 52, S453, 10.1086/659998 · DOI · Paper page
  4. E Dambrine, 2007, Present forest biodiversity patterns in France related to former Roman agriculture, Ecology, 88, 1430, 10.1890/05-1314 · DOI
  5. NJ Ross, 2011, Modern tree species composition reflects ancient Maya “forest gardens” in northwest Belize, Ecological Applications, 21, 75, 10.1890/09-0662.1 · DOI
  6. Fraser JA, Leach M, Fairhead J. Anthropogenic Dark Earths in the landscapes of Upper Guinea, West Africa: intentional or inevitable? Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2014:1–17. <comment>doi: 10.1080/00045608.2014.941735</comment> · DOI
  7. Bayliss-Smith T, Hviding E, Whitmore T. Rainforest composition and histories of human disturbance in Solomon Islands. Ambio. 2003:346–52. <comment>doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4315396</comment>
  8. W Balée, 2010, Contingent diversity on anthropic landscapes, Diversity, 2, 163, 10.3390/d2020163 · DOI · Paper page
  9. CH McMichael, 2012, Sparse pre-Columbian human habitation in western Amazonia, Science, 336, 1429, 10.1126/science.1219982 · DOI · Paper page
  10. GH Shepard Jr, 2011, “Made in Brazil”: human dispersal of the Brazil Nut (Bertholletia excelsa, Lecythidaceae) in ancient Amazonia, Economic Botany, 65, 44, 10.1007/s12231-011-9151-6 · DOI
  11. C Levis, 2012, Historical human footprint on modern tree species composition in the Purus-Madeira interfluve, central Amazonia, PLoS ONE, 7, e48559, 10.1371/journal.pone.0048559 · DOI · Paper page
  12. BL Turner, 1984, Economic plant species associated with prehistoric agriculture in the Maya lowlands, Economic Botany, 38, 179, 10.1007/BF02858831 · DOI
  13. BM Kumar, 2004, The enigma of tropical homegardens, Agroforestry Systems, 61, 135
  14. JA Fraser, 2011, Homegardens on Amazonian Dark Earths, non-anthropogenic upland, and floodplain soils along the Brazilian middle Madeira River exhibit diverging agrobiodiversity, Economic Botany, 65, 1, 10.1007/s12231-010-9143-y · DOI
  15. JA Fraser, 2011, Moraes CdP, Clement CR. Crop diversity on Anthropogenic Dark Earths in Central Amazonia, Human Ecology, 39, 395, 10.1007/s10745-011-9405-z · DOI
  16. WM Denevan, 1996, A bluff model of riverine settlement in prehistoric Amazonia, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86, 654, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1996.tb01771.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. CR Clement, 2010, Origin and domestication of native Amazonian crops, Diversity, 2, 72, 10.3390/d2010072 · DOI
  18. A Ducke, 1946, Plantas de cultura precolombiana na Amazônia brasileira. Notas sôbre as espécies ou formas espontâneas que supostamente lhes teriam dado origem, Boletim Técnico do Instituto Agronômico do Norte, 8, 1
  19. J Tollefson, 2013, Foot prints in the forest, Nature, 502, 160
  20. AB Junqueira, 2010, Secondary forests on anthropogenic soils in Brazilian Amazonia conserve agrobiodiversity, Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 1933, 10.1007/s10531-010-9813-1 · DOI
  21. MF Simões, 1987, Pesquisas arqueológicas no lago de Silves (Amazonas), Revista de Arqueologia, Belém, 4, 49, 10.24885/sab.v4i1.56 · DOI
  22. MJ Anderson, 2006, Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity, Ecology Letters, 9, 683, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00926.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lins, J., Lima, H. P., Baccaro, F. B., Kinupp, V. F., Shepard, G. H., & Clement, C. R.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2015-06-01
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
e0127067
ISSN
1932-6203
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0127067
PMC
PMC4451503
Cited by
44
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review