Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Contingent Diversity on Anthropic Landscapes

Balée, William·2010·Diversity

Abstract

Behaviorally modern human beings have lived in Amazonia for thousands of years. Significant dynamics in species turnovers due to human-mediated disturbance were associated with the ultimate emergence and expansion of agrarian technologies in prehistory. Such disturbances initiated primary and secondary landscape transformations in various locales of the Amazon region. Diversity in these locales can be understood by accepting the initial premise of contingency, expressed as unprecedented human agency and human history. These effects can be accessed through the archaeological record and in the study of living languages. In addition, landscape transformation can be demonstrated in the study of traditional knowledge (TK). One way of elucidating TK distinctions between anthropic and nonanthropic landscapes concerns elicitation of differential labeling of these landscapes and more significantly, elicitation of the specific contents, such as trees, occurring in these landscapes. Freelisting is a method which can be used to distinguish the differential species compositions of landscapes resulting from human-mediated disturbance vs. those which do not evince records of human agency and history. The TK of the Ka’apor Indians of Amazonian Brazil as revealed in freelisting exercises shows differentiation of anthropogenic from high forests as well as a recognition of diversity in the anthropogenic forests. This suggests that the agents of human-mediated disturbance and landscape transformation in traditional Amazonia encode diversity and contingency into their TK, which encoding reflects past cultural influence on landscape and society over time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/d2020163

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other 'anthropogenic' forests that were formed in pre-Columbian periods may be identifiable within the forest today, as some species, including some palms, were heavily promoted species.

    “Other 'anthropogenic' forests that were formed in pre-Columbian periods may be identifiable within the forest today, as some species, including some palms, were heavily promoted species [6,70-72].”

    From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [71]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. Silverman, H., and Isbell, W.H. (2008). Handbook of South American Archaeology, Springer. · DOI
  2. Silverman, H., and Isbell, W.H. (2008). Handbook of South American Archaeology, Springer. · DOI
  3. Henshilwood, 2003, The origin of modern human behavior, Curr. Anthropol., 44, 627, 10.1086/377665 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Silverman, H., and Isbell, W.H. (2008). Handbook of South American Archaeology, Springer. · DOI
  5. Clement, 2010, Origin and domestication of Native Amazonian crops, Diversity, 2, 72, 10.3390/d2010072 · DOI
  6. McEwan, C., Barreto, C., and Neves, E.G. (2001). Unknown Amazon: Culture in Nature in Ancient Brazil, British Museum Press.
  7. Rival, L. (2002). Trekking Through History: The Huaorani of Amazonian Ecuador, Columbia University Press. · DOI
  8. Posey, 1989, The culture of Amazonian forests, Resource Management in Amazonia: Indigenous and Folk Strategies, Volume 7, 1
  9. Coomes, 2009, Human modification of a large meandering Amazonian river: Genesis, ecological and economic consequences of the Masiseh cutoff on the Central Ucayali, Peru, Ambio, 38, 130, 10.1579/0044-7447-38.3.130 · DOI
  10. Balée, W., and Erickson, C.L. (2006). Time and Complexity in Historical Ecology: Studies in the Neotropical Lowlands, Columbia University Press. · DOI
  11. Raffles, 2003, Further reflections on Amazonian environmental history: Transformations of rivers and streams, Lat. Am. Res. Rev., 38, 165, 10.1353/lar.2003.0041 · DOI
  12. Silverman, H., and Isbell, W.H. (2008). Handbook of South American Archaeology, Springer. · DOI
  13. Roosevelt, 1991, Eighth millennium pottery from a prehistoric shell midden in the Brazilian Amazon, Science, 254, 1621, 10.1126/science.254.5038.1621 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Silverman, H., and Isbell, W.H. (2008). Handbook of South American Archaeology, Springer. · DOI
  15. Silverman, H., and Isbell, W.H. (2008). Handbook of South American Archaeology, Springer. · DOI
  16. Coppinger, 1983, The domestication of evolution, Environ. Conserv., 10, 283, 10.1017/S0376892900012984 · DOI
  17. Denevan, 1992, The pristine myth: The landscape of the Americas in 1492, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 82, 369, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1992.tb01965.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Dickinson, 2000, Changing times: The Holocene legacy, Environ. Hist., 5, 483, 10.2307/3985583 · DOI
  19. Huston, M.A. (1994). Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes., Cambridge University Press.
  20. 2006, The research program of historical ecology, Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 35, 75, 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123231 · DOI
  21. Turner, B.L. (1990). The Earth as Transformed by Human Action: Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere over the Past 300 Years, Cambridge University Press with Clark University, MA, USA.
  22. Langstroth, R. (1996). [Forest Islands in an Amazonian Savanna of Northeastern Bolivia. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin]. (UMI Dissertation Services: Ann Arbor, MI, USA).
  23. Woods, W.I., Teixeira, W.G., Lehmann, J., Steiner, C., WinklerPrins, A.M.G.A., and Rebellato, L. (2009). Amazonian Dark Earths: Wim Sombroek’s Vision., Springer. · DOI
  24. Plenderleith, K. (2002). Kayapó Ethnoecology and Culture, Routledge.
  25. Woods, W.I., Teixeira, W.G., Lehmann, J., Steiner, C., WinklerPrins, A.M.G.A., and Rebellato, L. (2009). Amazonian Dark Earths: Wim Sombroek’s Vision, Springer. · DOI
  26. Stahl, 2009, Adventive vertebrates and historical ecology in the Pre-Columbian Neotropics, Diversity, 1, 151, 10.3390/d1020151 · DOI
  27. Erickson, 2000, An artificial landscape-scale fishery in the Bolivian Amazon, Nature, 408, 190, 10.1038/35041555 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Lehmann, J., Kern, D.C., Glaser, B., and Woods, W.I. (2003). Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, Properties, Management, Kluwer. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Balée, W., and Erickson, C.L. (2006). Time and Complexity in Historical Ecology: Studies in the Neotropical Lowlands, Columbia University Press. · DOI
  30. Heckenberger, 2009, Amazonian archaeology, Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 38, 251, 10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164310 · DOI
  31. Heckenberger, 2007, The legacy of cultural landscapes in the Brazilian Amazon: Implications for biodiversity, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London Biol. Sci., 362, 197, 10.1098/rstb.2006.1979 · DOI
  32. Heckenberger, 2008, Pre-Columbian urbanism, anthropogenic landscapes, and the future of the Amazon, Science, 321, 1214, 10.1126/science.1159769 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Balée, W. (1994). Footprints of the Forest: Ka’apor Ethnobotany—The Historical Ecology of Plant Utilization by an Amazonian People, Columbia University Press.
  34. Balée, W., and Erickson, C.L. (2006). Time and Complexity in Historical Ecology: Studies in the Neotropical Lowlands, Columbia University Press. · DOI
  35. Woods, W.I., Teixeira, W.G., Lehmann, J., Steiner, C., WinklerPrins, A.M.G.A., and Rebellato, L. (2009). Amazonian Dark Earths: Wim Sombroek’s Vision, Springer. · DOI
  36. Woods, 1999, The anthropogenic origin and persistence of Amazon Dark Earths, Yearbook, Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers, 25, 7
  37. Sombroek, 2000, Amazon landforms and soils in relation to biological diversity, Acta Amazôn., 30, 81, 10.1590/1809-43922000301100 · DOI
  38. Notes, 1999, An alternative hypothesis for the origin of Amazonian bird diversity, J. Biogeogr., 26, 476
  39. Berlin, 2006, The first congress of ethnozoological nomenclature, J. Roy. Anthropol. Inst. (n.s.), 12, 23
  40. Nuckholls, J.B. (1996). Sounds like Life: Sound-Symbolic Grammar, Performance, and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua, Oxford University Press. · DOI
  41. Nuckholls, 1999, The case for sound symbolism, Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 28, 225, 10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.225 · DOI
  42. Adams, C., Murrieta, R., Neves, W., and Harris, M. (2009). Amazon Peasant Societies in a Changing Environment: Political Ecology, Invisibility and Modernity in the Rainforest, Springer. · DOI
  43. Witkowski, 1983, Marking-reversals and cultural importance, Language, 59, 569, 10.2307/413904 · DOI
  44. Maffi, L. (2001). On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge, and the Environment, Smithsonian Institution Press.
  45. Selin, H. (2003). Nature across Cultures: Views of Nature and the Environment in Non-Western Cultures, Kluwer Academic Publishers. · DOI
  46. Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies, Princeton University Press. · DOI
  47. Posey, 1986, Topics and issues in ethnoentomology with some suggestions for the development of hypothesis-generation and testing in ethnobiology, J. Ethnobiol., 6, 99
  48. Posey, 1985, Additional notes on the classification and knowledge of stingless bees (Meliponinae, Apidae, Hymenoptera) by the Kayapó Indians of Gorotire, Pará, Brazil, Ann. Carnegie Mus., 54, 247, 10.5962/p.330774 · DOI
  49. Conford, F.M. (1950). Plato’s Timaeus, The Liberal Arts Press.
  50. Glacken, CJ. (1967). Traces on the Rhodian Shore: Nature and Culture in Western Thought from Ancient Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century, University of California Press. · DOI
  51. Davies, 2001, What makes genetically modified organisms so distasteful?, Trends Biotechnol., 19, 424, 10.1016/S0167-7799(01)01767-X · DOI
  52. Hall, M. (2005). Earth Repair: A Transatlantic History of Environmental Restoration, University of Virginia Press.
  53. Clement, 1999, 1492 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources. I: The relation between domestication and human population decline, Econ. Bot., 53, 188, 10.1007/BF02866498 · DOI
  54. Clement, 1999, 1492 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources II: Crop biogeography at contact, Econ. Bot., 53, 203, 10.1007/BF02866499 · DOI
  55. Gardner, 2009, Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world, Ecol. Lett., 12, 561, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01294.x · DOI
  56. Mullarkey, J. (1999). The New Bergson, Manchester University Press.
  57. Slater, C. (1994). Dance of the Dolphin: Transformation and Disenchantment in the Amazonian Imagination, University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  58. 1998, Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism, J. Roy. Anthropol. Inst. (n.s.), 4, 469, 10.2307/3034157 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 2004, Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation, J. Soc. Anthropol. Lowland S. Amer., 2, 1
  60. Uzendoski, M. (2005). The Napo Runa of Amazonian Ecuador, University of Illinois Press. · DOI
  61. Nelson, 2008, Ethnobotanical ground-truthing: Indigenous knowledge, floristic inventories and satellite imagery in the upper Rio Negro, Brazil, J. Biogeogr., 35, 2237, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01975.x · DOI
  62. Fleck, 2000, Matses Indian rainforest habitat classification and mammalian diversity in Amazonian Peru, J. Ethnobiol., 20, 1
  63. Shepard, 2001, Rain forest habitat classification among the Matsigenka of the Peruvian Amazon, J. Ethnobiol., 21, 1
  64. Hughes, J.D. (2001). An Environmental History of the World. Humankind’s Changing Role in the Community of Life, Routledge.
  65. 2009, The meaning of “tree” in two different Tupí-Guaraní languages from two different Neotropical forests, Amazônica. Revista de Antropologia, 1, 96
  66. Nolan, 2001, Pursuing the fruits of knowledge. Cognitive ethnobotany in Missouri's Little Dixie, J. Ethnobiol., 21, 9
  67. Quinlan, 2005, Considerations for collecting freelists in the field: Examples from ethnobotany, Field Method, 17, 219, 10.1177/1525822X05277460 · DOI
  68. Schensul, J.J., LeCompte, M.D., Nastasi, B.K., and Borgatti, S.P. (1999). Enhanced Ethnographic Methods. Audiovisual Techniques, Focused Group Interviews, and Elicitation Techniques, Altamira Press.
  69. Zipf, G. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort, Addison Wesley.
  70. Smith, 1993, Using ANTHROPAC 3.5 and a spreadsheet to compute a free-list salience index, Cult. Anthropol. Methods J., 5, 1
  71. Anderson, A.B., May, P.H., and Balick, M.J. (1991). The Subsidy from Nature. Palm Forests, Peasantry, and Development on an Amazon Frontier, Columbia University Press.
  72. Bernal, 2001, Remains of palms (Palmae) at archaeological sites in the New World. A review, Bot. Rev., 67, 309, 10.1007/BF02858098 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Balée, W.
Affiliations
Department of Anthropology, Tulane University, 7041 Freret St., New Orleans, LA 70118, USA
Venue
Diversity
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2010-02-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
163-181
ISSN
1424-2818
Cited by
55
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review