Cited by 99Influenza Virus Research StudiesRespiratory viral infections researchVirology and Viral Diseases

Microneutralization Assay Titres Correlate with Protection against Seasonal Influenza H1N1 and H3N2 in Children

Open access
Verschoor, Chris P., Singh, Pardeep, Russell, Margaret L., Bowdish, Dawn M. E., Brewer, Angela, Cyr, Louis, Ward, Brian J., Loeb, Mark·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Although the microneutralization (MN) assay has been shown to be more sensitive than the hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay for the measurement of humoral immunity against influenza viruses, further evidence relating MN titres to protective efficacy against infection is needed. Serum antibodies against seasonal H1N1 and H3N2 influenza were measured in children and adolescents (n = 656) by MN and hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays. Compared to HAI, the MN assay is more sensitive in detecting serum antibodies and estimates of protective effectiveness against PCR-confirmed infection were higher for both subtypes. Given our findings, the MN assay warrants further consideration as a formal tool for the routine evaluation of vaccine-induced antibody responses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0131531

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measurement of serum neutralizing activity has been shown to be a mechanistic correlate of protection for other respiratory viruses, such as influenza and respiratory syncytial virus, and is generally accepted as a functional biomarker of the in vivo humoral response.

    “Though correlates of protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection have not yet been determined, measurement of serum neutralizing activity has been shown to be a mechanistic correlate of protection for other respiratory viruses, such as influenza14 and respiratory syncytial virus,15 and is generally accepted as a functional biomarker of the in vivo humoral response.16”

    From An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — Preliminary Report (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The BNT162b2 vaccine encodes the full-length trimerised S protein of SARS-CoV-2 and is formulated in lipid nanoparticles.

    “The BNT162b2 vaccine encodes the full-length trimerised S protein of SARS CoV-2 and is formulated in lipid nanoparticles for delivery to cells12.”
  • Participants showed similar neutralising activity against wild type pseudovirus as in the phase I/II study.

    “Participants showed similar neutralising activity against wild type pseudovirus as in the phase I/II study12.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verschoor, C. P., Singh, P., Russell, M. L., Bowdish, D. M. E., Brewer, A., Cyr, L., Ward, B. J., & Loeb, M.
Affiliations
  • Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Loeb, Mark
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-06-24
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
e0131531
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1960083897
Cited by
99
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
6.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • McGill University
  • McMaster University
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Public Health Agency
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (88113_1)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (#1 U01 AI 76208-01A1, U01AI076208)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
microneutralization, hemagglutination inhibition test, H1N1 influenza, influenza H3N2, seasonal influenza, humoral immunity, vaccine-induced antibody response, children and adolescents, assay sensitivity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Alberta, Antibodies, Viral, Antibody Formation, Child, Child, Preschool, Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests, Humans, Influenza, Human, Influenza Vaccines, Manitoba, Neutralization Tests, Prospective Studies, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype, Immunity, Humoral

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review