Cited by 99Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyMedication Adherence and ComplianceHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Patient and Provider Reported Reasons for Lost to Follow Up in MDRTB Treatment: A Qualitative Study from a Drug Resistant TB Centre in India

Open access
Deshmukh, Rajesh D., Dhande, D. J., Sachdeva, Kuldeep Singh, Sreenivas, Achuthan, Kumar, A. M. V., Satyanarayana, Srinath, Parmar, Malik, Moonan, Patrick K. +1 more·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis (MDR TB) is emerging public health concern globally. Lost to follow-up (LTFU) is one of the key challenge in MDRTB treatment. In 2013, 18% of MDR TB patients were reported LTFU in India. A qualitative study was conducted to obtain better understanding of both patient and provider related factors for LTFU among MDR TB treatment. METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured personal interviews were conducted with 20 MDRTB patients reported as LTFU and 10 treatment providers in seven districts linked to Nagpur Drug resistant TB Centre (DRTBC) during August 2012-February 2013. Interviews were transcribed and inductive content analysis was performed to derive emergent themes. RESULTS: We found multiple factors influencing MDR TB treatment adherence. Barriers to treatment adherence included drug side effects, a perceived lack of provider support, patient financial constraints, conflicts with the timing of treatment services, alcoholism and social stigma. CONCLUSIONS: Patient adherence to treatment is multi-factorial and involves individual patient factors, provider factors, and community factors. Addressing issue of LTFU during MDRTB treatment requires enhanced efforts towards resolving medical problems like adverse drug effects, developing short duration treatment regimens, reducing pill burden, motivational counselling, flexible timings for DOT services, social, family support for patients & improving awareness about disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0135802

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many factors influence MDR-TB patients' treatment adherence: side effects of treatment, lack of support from health service providers, financial conditions, alcohol use, and social stigma.

    “A qualitative study explains that many factors influence MDR-TB patients’ treatment adherence; these factors are side effects of treatment, lack of support from health service providers, financial conditions, alcohol use, and the existence of social stigma MDR-TB patients experienced.31”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deshmukh, R. D., Dhande, D. J., Sachdeva, K. S., Sreenivas, A., Kumar, A. M. V., Satyanarayana, S., Parmar, M., Moonan, P. K., & Lo, T. Q.
Affiliations
  • World Health Organization - India (IN)
  • NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital (IN)
  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (IN)
  • International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (FR)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Deshmukh, Rajesh D.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-08-24
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
e0135802
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113382006
Cited by
99
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, loss to follow-up, medication adherence, adverse drug reactions, alcoholism, social stigma, financial constraints, directly observed therapy, motivational counseling, family support, medication burden
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, India, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Public Health, Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant, Qualitative Research, Lost to Follow-Up, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review