Cited by 18Fungal Infections and StudiesActinomycetales infections and treatmentSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research

The Changing Epidemiology of Coccidioidomycosis in Los Angeles (LA) County, California, 1973–2011.

Open access
Guevara, Ramon E., Motala, Tasneem, Terashita, Dawn·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Coccidioidomycosis, also known as Valley Fever, is often thought of as an endemic disease of central California exclusive of Los Angeles County. The fungus that causes Valley Fever, Coccidioides spp., grows in previously undisturbed soil of semi-arid and arid environments of certain areas of the Americas. LA County has a few large areas with such environments, particularly the Antelope Valley which has been having substantial land development. Coccidioidomycosis that is both clinically- and laboratory-confirmed is a mandated reportable disease in LA County. Population surveillance data for 1973-2011 reveals an annual rate increase from 0.87 to 3.2 cases per 100,000 population (n = 61 to 306 annual cases). In 2004, case frequency started substantially increasing with notable epidemiologic changes such as a rising 2.1 to 5.7 male-to-female case ratio stabilizing to 1.4-2.2. Additionally, new building construction in Antelope Valley greatly rose in 2003 and displayed a strong correlation (R = 0.92, Pearson p<0.0001) with overall LA County incidence rates for 1996-2007. Of the 24 LA County health districts, 19 had a 100%-1500% increase in cases when comparing 2000-2003 to 2008-2011. Case residents of endemic areas had stronger odds of local exposures, but cases from areas not known to be endemic had greater mortality (14% versus 9%) with notably more deaths during 2008-2011. Compared to the 57 other California counties during 2001-2011, LA County had the third highest average annual number of cases and Antelope Valley had a higher incidence rate than all but six counties. With the large number of reported coccidioidomycosis cases, multi-agency and community partnering is recommended to develop effective education and prevention strategies to protect residents and travelers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0136753

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In coccidioidomycosis surveillance in California (1973 to 2011), the increase in incidence followed different environmental exposures, including occupational exposures such as construction and agriculture, regardless of the population's racial and ethnic groups.

    “Such a hypothesis was explored in coccidioidomycosis surveillance in California (1973 to 2011) that showed the increase in the incidence of coccidioidomycosis followed different environmental exposures, including occupational exposures such as construction and agriculture, regardless of the population’s racial and ethnic groups [139].”

    From Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections? (2023) · cites this paper as [139]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Johnson RH, Caldwell JW, Welch G, Einstein HE. The great coccidioidomycosis epidemic: clinical fea- tures. In: Einstein HE, Catanzaro A, editors. Coccidioidomycosis. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference. Bethesda, MD: National Foundation for Infectious Diseases. 1996. pp. 77-87.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guevara, R. E., Motala, T., & Terashita, D.
Affiliations
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (US)
Corresponding author
Guevara, Ramon E.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-08-27
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
e0136753
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1935547708
Cited by
18
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • California Department of Public Health
  • Los Angeles County Department of Public Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology › Actinomycetales infections and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
Keywords
coccidioidomycosis, Coccidioides, Los Angeles County, Antelope Valley, incidence trends, sex ratio, building construction, mortality, disease surveillance, prevention education
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, California, Child, Child, Preschool, Coccidioidomycosis, Environmental Exposure, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Population Growth, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review