Cited by 42Birth, Development, and HealthChild Nutrition and Water AccessEarly Childhood Education and Development

Early childhood development and schooling attainment: longitudinal evidence from British, Finnish and Philippine birth cohorts

Open access
Peet, Evan D., McCoy, Dana C., Danaei, Goodarz, Ezzati, Majid, Fawzi, Wafaie, Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta, Pillas, Demetris, Fink, Günther·2015·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While recent literature has highlighted the importance of early childhood development for later life outcomes, comparatively little is known regarding the relative importance of early physical and cognitive development in predicting educational attainment cross-culturally. METHODS: We used prospective data from three birth cohorts: the Northern Finland Birth Cohort of 1986 (NFBC1986), the 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS1970), and the Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey of 1983 (CLHNS) to assess the association of height-for-age z-score (HAZ) and cognitive development measured prior to age 8 with schooling attainment. Multivariate linear regression models were used to estimate baseline and adjusted associations. RESULTS: Both physical and cognitive development were highly predictive of adult educational attainment conditional on parental characteristics. The largest positive associations between physical development and schooling were found in the CLHNS (β = 0.53, 95%-CI: [0.32, 0.74]) with substantially smaller associations in the BCS1970 (β = 0.10, 95% CI [0.04, 0.16]) and the NFBC1986 (β = 0.06, 95% CI [-0.05, 0.16]). Strong associations between cognitive development and educational attainment were found for all three cohorts (NFBC1986: β = 0.22, 95%-CI: [0.12, 0.31], BCS1970: β = 0.58, 95%-CI: [0.52, 0.64], CLHNS: β = 1.08, 95%-CI: [0.88, 1.27]). Models jointly estimating educational associations of physical and cognitive development demonstrated weaker associations for physical development and minimal changes for cognitive development. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that although physical and cognitive early development are both important predictors of educational attainment, cognitive development appears to play a particularly important role. The large degree of heterogeneity in the observed effect sizes suggest that the importance of early life physical growth and cognitive development is highly dependent on socioeconomic and institutional contexts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0137219

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peet, E. D., McCoy, D. C., Danaei, G., Ezzati, M., Fawzi, W., Jarvelin, M.-R., Pillas, D., & Fink, G.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Peet, Evan D.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2015-09-09
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
e0137219
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131633829
Cited by
42
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Aga Khan Foundation
  • Bernard van Leer Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (100693)
  • Grand Challenges Canada
  • Fundação Maria Cecilia Souto Vidigal
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
early childhood development, educational attainment, height-for-age z-score, physical growth, cognitive development, birth cohort, cross-cultural comparison, parental characteristics, socioeconomic context, Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986, 1970 British Cohort Study, Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Finland, United Kingdom, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Philippines, Physical Education and Training, Pregnancy, Schools, Socioeconomic Factors, Cohort Studies, Nutrition Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review