Cited by 230Gut microbiota and healthAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGastrointestinal motility and disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 45 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Comparison of Fecal Microbiota in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Neurotypical Siblings in the Simons Simplex Collection

Open access

Abstract

In order to assess potential associations between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) phenotype, functional GI disorders and fecal microbiota, we recruited simplex families, which had only a single ASD proband and neurotypical (NT) siblings, through the Simons Simplex Community at the Interactive Autism Network (SSC@IAN). Fecal samples and metadata related to functional GI disorders and diet were collected from ASD probands and NT siblings of ASD probands (age 7-14). Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) were assessed using the parent-completed ROME III questionnaire for pediatric FGIDs, and problem behaviors were assessed using the Child Behavior Check List (CBCL). Targeted quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays were conducted on selected taxa implicated in ASD, including Sutterella spp., Bacteroidetes spp. and Prevotella spp. Illumina sequencing of the V1V2 and the V1V3 regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA genes from fecal DNA was performed to an average depth of 208,000 and 107,000 high-quality reads respectively. Twenty-five of 59 ASD children and 13 of 44 NT siblings met ROME III criteria for at least one FGID. Functional constipation was more prevalent in ASD (17 of 59) compared to NT siblings (6 of 44, P = 0.035). The mean CBCL scores in NT siblings with FGID, ASD children with FGID and ASD without FGID were comparably higher (58-62 vs. 44, P < 0.0001) when compared to NT children without FGID. There was no significant difference in macronutrient intake between ASD and NT siblings. There was no significant difference in ASD severity scores between ASD children with and without FGID. No significant difference in diversity or overall microbial composition was detected between ASD children with NT siblings. Exploratory analysis of the 16S rRNA sequencing data, however, identified several low abundance taxa binned at the genus level that were associated with ASD and/or first order ASD*FGID interactions (FDR <0.1).

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In simplex families from SSC@IAN, ASD children and their neurotypical siblings showed no significant difference in overall fecal microbial diversity or composition, but functional constipation was more common in ASD children. Exploratory 16S analyses found only low-abundance genus-level taxa associated with ASD and/or ASD*FGID interactions.

Key findings

  • Among 59 ASD children and 44 NT siblings from 66 families, 25/59 ASD children (42%) and 13/44 NT siblings (30%) met ROME III criteria for at least one FGID; functional constipation was more prevalent in ASD children (17/59) than NT siblings (6/44, P = 0.035).
  • Mean CBCL scores in NT siblings with FGID, ASD children with FGID, and ASD children without FGID were comparably higher than NT children without FGID (58–62 vs. 44, P < 0.0001); no significant difference in macronutrient intake was found between ASD and NT siblings, and ADOS-CSS did not differ significantly between ASD children with and without FGID.
  • No significant difference in α-diversity, β-diversity, or overall microbial composition was detected between ASD children and NT siblings; targeted qPCR showed no significant differences for Sutterella, Prevotella, Bacteroidetes, C. coccoides-E. rectales, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, or Escherichia coli.
  • Exploratory 16S rRNA sequencing identified several low-abundance genus-level taxa associated with ASD and/or first-order ASD*FGID interactions at FDR < 0.1, including Cyanobacteria/Chloroplast, which was increased in the ASD-with-FGID group and appeared linked to chia seed consumption in two ASD children with functional constipation.

Methods

  • Families were recruited through the Simons Simplex Community at the Interactive Autism Network (SSC@IAN); of 245 potentially eligible families with 339 children, 107 families with 145 children consented and 66 families with 103 children completed the study. Participants were ASD probands and NT siblings aged 7–14, excluding those with GI disease, serious medical problems, or antibiotics within one month of stool collection.
  • Parents completed the ROME III questionnaire for pediatric FGIDs, the CBCL/6-18, and a one-week food diary; fecal samples underwent targeted qPCR for selected bacterial subgroups and Illumina sequencing of the V1V2 and V1V3 regions of bacterial 16S rRNA genes.
  • Analyses included Fisher exact tests, mixed-effect models with ASD, FGID, and ASD*FGID as fixed effects and family as random effect, α-diversity indices, PERMANOVA for β-diversity, and negative binomial/zero-inflated negative binomial models for individual OTUs with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR adjustment.

Limitations

  • The paper states that although this is one of the larger studies of its kind, the sample size is still modest given the number of variables included, and that additional ASD children, NT siblings (preferably family matched), and unrelated controls using the same phenotyping tools are needed to confirm the findings.
  • The paper states that it may be necessary to restrict dietary intake of plant-derived supplements such as chia seeds to determine whether the Cyanobacteria/Chloroplast signal is biologically significant for ASD pathophysiology.
  • Evident from the text: the study lacked unrelated NT controls, so it cannot distinguish whether NT siblings of ASD children have altered microbiomes relative to the general population; the significant microbial findings are exploratory, low-abundance, and not consistently replicated across V1V2 and V1V3 datasets.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0137725

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 45 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 45 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 11
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 23
30 of 30
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 7-day parent-recorded food diary accurately estimates children's daily macronutrient intake.

    “The parents were asked to record the daily dietary intake of ASD and NT siblings on the Stony Brook University Medical Center Department of Pediatrics Food Diary/Calorie Count sheet for 7 days prior to the collection of the stool sample.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The study had adequate statistical power to detect differences in the microbial outcomes measured between ASD and NT siblings.

    “No significant difference in diversity or overall microbial composition was detected between ASD children with NT siblings.”
    “No significant difference was observed for any of these bacterial subgroups in the 37 ASD/NT sibling pairs (see Methods).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The study had adequate statistical power to detect differences in macronutrient intake between ASD and NT siblings.

    “There was no significant difference in macronutrient intake between ASD and NT siblings.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Completed-study group counts conflict

    Major

    The methods say 66 ASD children and 37 NT siblings completed the study, while the results say 59 ASD children and 44 NT siblings completed it. Both descriptions total 103 children but assign seven children to different groups.

  • Diet-restriction total disagrees with Table 3

    Minor

    The four groups in Table 3 list 1, 3, 0, and 1 children on a gluten- or casein-free diet, totaling five rather than four.

    Reported 4 · recomputed 5

  • FGID concordance percentage uses the wrong denominator

    Minor

    Six of the 37 matched sibling pairs is 16.2%, not the reported 18%.

    Reported 18 · recomputed 16.216216

  • Matched NT sibling FGID count differs from Table 1

    Minor

    The results text says 13 matched NT siblings had an FGID, but Table 1 reports 12.

  • H1b and H1c diagnoses are reversed in Table 1

    Minor

    The results text identifies H1b as cyclic vomiting syndrome and H1c as aerophagia, while Table 1 assigns those labels the other way around.

5 of 5

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. R Krajmalnik-Brown, 2015, Gut bacteria in children with autism spectrum disorders: challenges and promise of studying how a complex community influences a complex disease, Microb Ecol Health Dis, 26, 26914
  2. Y Rosseel, 2012, lavaanAn R package for structural equation modeling, JSS, 48, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 230

Metadata

Authors
Son, J. S., Zheng, L. J., Rowehl, L. M., Tian, X., Zhang, Y., Zhu, W., Litcher-Kelly, L., Gadow, K. D., Gathungu, G., Robertson, C. E., Ir, D., Frank, D. N., & Li, E.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Ellen
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-10-01
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
e0137725
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1860290282
Cited by
229
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Academic Commons (Stony Brook University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation
  • Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, fecal microbiota, functional gastrointestinal disorders, constipation, siblings, gut microbiota, Sutterella, Bacteroidetes, Prevotella, child behavior problems, macronutrient intake, ASD severity, microbial taxa
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Bacteria, Child, Diet, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Phenotype, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Case-Control Studies, Siblings, Gastrointestinal Tract, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review