Cited by 103Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsSmoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Adult Behavior in Male Mice Exposed to E-Cigarette Nicotine Vapors during Late Prenatal and Early Postnatal Life

Open access
Smith, Dani, Aherrera, Angela, Lopez, Armando, Neptune, Enid, Winickoff, Jonathan P., Klein, Jonathan D., Chen, Gang, Lazarus, Philip +2 more·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

METHODS: Timed-pregnant C57BL/6J mice were exposed to 2.4% nicotine in propylene glycol (PG) or 0% nicotine /PG once a day from gestational day 15 until delivery. After delivery, offspring and mothers were exposed to E-cigarette vapors for an additional 14 days from postnatal day 2 through 16. Following their last exposure serum cotinine levels were measured in female juvenile mice. Male mice underwent behavioral testing at 14 weeks of age to assess sensorimotor, affective, and cognitive functional domains. RESULTS: Adult male mice exposed to 2.4% nicotine/PG E-cigarette vapors had significantly more head dips in the zero maze test and higher levels of rearing activity in the open field test compared to 0% nicotine/PG exposed mice and untreated controls. In the water maze test after reversal training, the 2.4% nicotine/PG mice spent more than 25% of time in the new location whereas the other groups did not. CONCLUSION: Adult male mice exhibited increased levels of activity in the zero maze and open field tests when exposed to E-cigarette vapor containing nicotine during late prenatal and early postnatal life. These findings indicate that nicotine exposure from E-cigarettes may cause persistent behavioral changes when exposure occurs during a period of rapid brain growth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0137953

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mouse models of early life e-cigarette exposure have demonstrated altered behavior patterns in adult offspring and reduced cognitive function (18-24 mg/mL nicotine).

    “Mouse models of early life e-cigarette exposure have also demonstrated altered behavior patterns in adult offspring and reduced cognitive function (18–24 mg/mL nicotine) [177, 178].”

    From Prenatal nicotine exposure during pregnancy results in adverse neurodevelopmental alterations and neurobehavioral deficits (2023) · cites this paper as [178]

    The Discussion reports increased activity in adult male mice exposed during late prenatal and early postnatal life to 2.4% nicotine vapor, supporting the altered-behavior claim. The Results report that all groups learned the water-maze task equally well, while the Discussion suggests a tendency toward increased—not reduced—cognitive flexibility in the nicotine-exposed mice. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]Marchenko Y (2006) Estimating variance components in Stata. The Stata Journal 6: 1– 21.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, D., Aherrera, A., Lopez, A., Neptune, E., Winickoff, J. P., Klein, J. D., Chen, G., Lazarus, P., Collaco, J. M., & McGrath-Morrow, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • American Academy of Pediatrics (US)
  • Washington State University (US)
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-09-15
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
e0137953
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118238343
Cited by
103
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (NIH RHL114800A)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (RHL114800A)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL114800)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES025460)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
prenatal nicotine exposure, sensorimotor behavior, emotional behavior, cognitive function, rearing behavior, propylene glycol, C57BL/6J mice, developmental neurotoxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Body Weight, Cognition, Cotinine, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Activity, Nicotine, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Sensation, Volatilization, Maternal Exposure, Mice, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review