Cited by 152Gender Studies and Social IssuesChild Nutrition and Water AccessMenstrual Health and Disorders

Sanitation, stress, and life stage: A systematic data collection study among women in Odisha, India.

Open access
Hulland, Kristyna R. S., Chase, Rachel P., Caruso, Bethany A., Swain, Rojalin, Biswal, Bismita, Sahoo, Krushna Chandra, Panigrahi, Pinaki, Dreibelbis, Robert·2015·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Emerging evidence demonstrates how inadequate access to water and sanitation is linked to psychosocial stress, especially among women, forcing them to navigate social and physical barriers during their daily sanitation routines. We examine sanitation-related psychosocial stress (SRPS) across women's reproductive lives in three distinct geographic sites (urban slums, rural villages, and rural tribal villages) in Odisha, India. We explored daily sanitation practices of adolescent, newly married, pregnant, and established adult women (n = 60) and identified stressors encountered during sanitation. Responding to structured data collection methods, women ranked seven sanitation activities (defecation, urination, menstruation, bathing, post-defecation cleaning, carrying water, and changing clothes) based on stress (high to low) and level of freedom (associated with greatest freedom to having the most restrictions). Women then identified common stressors they encountered when practicing sanitation and sorted stressors in constrained piles based on frequency and severity of each issue. The constellation of factors influencing SRPS varies by life stage and location. Overall, sanitation behaviors that were most restricted (i.e., menstruation) were the most stressful. Women in different sites encountered different stressors, and the level of perceived severity varied based on site and life stage. Understanding the influence of place and life stage on SRPS provides a nuanced understanding of sanitation, and may help identify areas for intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0141883

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Movement restrictions influenced women and girls' access to water and defecation, urination, and menstrual management locations, and are most widely reported in India.

    “Movement restrictions influenced women and girls' access to water [101, 110, 178] and defecation, urination, and menstrual management locations, and are most widely reported in India [62, 135, 174, 181, 182, 184, 187], [101,110,187,[189][190][191].”
  • General and sexual harassment are more frequently observed/documented in sanitation than water research.

    “General harassment, including taunting, teasing, name calling, and throwing things at women or girls is more frequently observed in sanitation [138, 168, 174, 175, 181, 187, 190, 263] than water research [168,199] Sexual harassment, including verbal harassment, peeping, flashing, and male masturbation is also more frequently documented in sanitation [171-174, 189, 190, 214, 217, 226, 231, 233]”
  • Fear of sexual assault was reported to be greatest at night, leading some women to use bags and buckets for sanitation needs; in India, urban settings reported greater fear than rural settings.

    “Fear of sexual assault was reported to be greatest at night, [123, 186, 238, 239, 255] leading some women to use bags and buckets for sanitation needs [175, 255, 270].In India, those in urban settings reported greater fear of sexual assault when accessing sanitation than those in rural settings [181,189].”
  • Women reported myriad sanitation-related stressors, including fear of being attacked by men or ghosts, being shamed for using open defecation sites, suppressing urination or defecation, withholding food and water, needing help to meet sanitation needs, being hurried while using shared facilities, sanitation-related costs, and lacking privacy or being seen by others, especially men, while openly

    “Women reported myriad sanitation-related stressors, including fear of being attacked by men or ghosts, [177, 181, 184, 189, 229, 238] being shamed for using open defecation sites, [172] suppressing urination or defecation, [184] withholding food and water, [184] needing help to meet sanitation needs, [184] being hurried while using shared facilities, [168, 185, 188] sanitation-related costs, [170,”
  • Compromised water and sanitation environments have led to suppression of urination, defecation and menstrual hygiene needs.

    “and suppression of urination, defecation and menstrual hygiene needs, [2,62,181,184,188,190,191,214,217,224,229,235,236,238,240,241,247,248,250,270] among other impacts.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 152

Authors
Hulland, K. R. S., Chase, R. P., Caruso, B. A., Swain, R., Biswal, B., Sahoo, K. C., Panigrahi, P., & Dreibelbis, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Asian Institute of Public Health (IN)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
Dreibelbis, Robert
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2015-11-09
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
e0141883
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121303526
Cited by
152
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
17.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Chicago (cc-by)
Funders
Department for International Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
menstrual hygiene, defecation, micturition, water carrying, bathing, life stages, urban slums, rural villages, tribal villages, Odisha, gender and sanitation, water access
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Hygiene, India, Poverty Areas, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rural Population, Sanitation, Stress, Psychological, Toilet Facilities, Urban Population, Young Adult, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review