Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 42Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyChild Development and Digital Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of U.S. University Students' Problematic Internet Use on Family Relationships: A Mixed-Methods Investigation

Open access

Abstract

This is the first study to investigate how college students in the U.S. with problematic Internet use perceive the role the Internet plays within their families of origin. The sample included 27 U.S. university students who self-identified as excessive Internet users. Participants reported spending more than 25 hours a week on the Internet on non-school or non-work-related activities and reported Internet-associated health and/or psychosocial problems. This study provides descriptive statistics from participants' completion of two problematic Internet use measures (i.e., Young's Diagnostic Questionnaire and the Compulsive Internet Use Scale) and reports findings from four focus groups. Three themes emerged from the focus groups: (1) family connectedness, (2) family conflict/family disconnection, and (3) family Internet overuse. The findings of this study are a first step toward the design of effective interventions for problematic Internet use among U.S. college students and serve to inform clinical practice and health policy in this area.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0144005

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Takeuchi L (2011) Families matter: Designing media for a digital age. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
  2. JE Grant, 2010, Introduction to behavioral addictions, Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse, 36, 233, 10.3109/00952990.2010.491884 · DOI · Paper page
  3. KW Beard, 2001, Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction, Cyberpsychol Behav, 4, 377, 10.1089/109493101300210286 · DOI
  4. MA Moreno, 2011, Problematic internet use among us youth: A systematic review, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 165, 797, 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.58 · DOI
  5. C-H Ko, 2009, Predictive values of psychiatric symptoms for internet addiction in adolescents: A 2-year prospective study, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 163, 937, 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.159 · DOI
  6. C-H Ko, 2008, The association between Internet addiction and problematic alcohol use in adolescents: The problem behavior model, Cyberpsychol Behav, 11, 571, 10.1089/cpb.2007.0199 · DOI
  7. J-Y Yen, 2009, The association between harmful alcohol use and Internet addiction among college students: Comparison of personality, Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 63, 218, 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2009.01943.x · DOI
  8. LT Lam, 2009, The association between internet addiction and self-injurious behaviour among adolescents, Inj Prev, 15, 403, 10.1136/ip.2009.021949 · DOI
  9. K Choi, 2009, Internet overuse and excessive daytime sleepiness in adolescents, Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 63, 455, 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2009.01925.x · DOI
  10. KW Beard, 2005, Internet addiction: A review of current assessment techniques and potential assessment questions, Cyberpsychol Behav, 8, 7, 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.7 · DOI · Paper page
  11. KS Young, 2004, Internet addiction: A new clinical phenomenon and its consequences, Am Behav Sci, 48, 402, 10.1177/0002764204270278 · DOI · Paper page
  12. K Wilcox, 2014, Are close friends the enemy? Online social networks, self-esteem, and self-control, J Consum Res, S63
  13. GS Mesch, 2003, The family and the Internet: The Israeli case, Soc Sci Q, 84, 1038, 10.1046/j.0038-4941.2003.08404016.x · DOI
  14. R Dogra, 2012, Addictive behaviour: Aetiology and treatment, Dysphrenia, 3
  15. GS Mesch, 2006, Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach, J Fam Commun, 6, 119, 10.1207/s15327698jfc0602_2 · DOI
  16. GS Mesch, 2006, Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the Internet, Inf Comm Soc, 9, 473, 10.1080/13691180600858705 · DOI
  17. DW Black, 2006, A family study of pathological gambling, Psychiatry Res, 141, 295, 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.12.005 · DOI
  18. JE Grant, 2003, Family history and psychiatric comorbidity in persons with kleptomania, Compr Psychiatry, 44, 437, 10.1016/S0010-440X(03)00150-0 · DOI
  19. KS Young, 1998, Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder, Cyberpsychol Behav, 1, 237, 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237 · DOI · Paper page
  20. W Li, 2015, Characteristics of Internet addiction/pathological internet use in U.S. university students: A qualitative-method investigation, PLOS ONE, 10, 1
  21. JE O’Brien, Problem internet overuse behaviors in college students: Readiness-to-change and receptivity to treatment, J Evid Inf Soc Work
  22. NA Dowling, 2009, Screening for Internet dependence: Do the proposed diagnostic criteria differentiate normal from dependent Internet use?, Cyberpsychol Behav, 12, 21, 10.1089/cpb.2008.0162 · DOI
  23. W Li, 2013, Family factors in Internet addiction among Chinese youth: A review of English- and Chinese-language studies, Comput Human Behav, 31, 393, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.004 · DOI

Cited by

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Snyder, S. M., Li, W., O’Brien, J. E., & Howard, M. O.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Howard, Matthew O.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-12-11
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
e0144005
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2190141664
Cited by
42
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Archive @ GSU (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UNC Libraries
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
problematic internet use, compulsive internet use, university students, family relationships, family connectedness, family conflict, excessive internet use, Compulsive Internet Use Scale, psychosocial problems
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Family Relations, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, United States, Universities, Behavior, Addictive, Focus Groups, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of U.S. University Students' Problematic Internet Use on Family Relationships: A Mixed-Methods Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0144005
The paper
Snyder, S. M., Li, W., O’Brien, J. E., & Howard, M. O. (2015). The Effect of U.S. University Students' Problematic Internet Use on Family Relationships: A Mixed-Methods Investigation. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144005