Cited by 44Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Attitudes of Psychiatric Nurses about the Request for Euthanasia on the Basis of Unbearable Mental Suffering(UMS)

Open access
De Hert, Marc, Van Bos, Liesbet, Sweers, Kim, Wampers, Martien, De Lepeleire, Jan, Correll, Christophe U.·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: When psychiatric patients express a wish for euthanasia, this should first and foremost be interpreted as a cry for help. Due to their close day-to-day relationship, psychiatric nurses may play an important and central role in responding to such requests. However, little is known about nurses' attitudes towards euthanasia motivated by unbearable mental suffering. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide insight into the attitudes and actions taken by psychiatric nurses when confronted with a patient's euthanasia request based on unbearable mental suffering (UMS). METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to 11 psychiatric hospitals in the Flemish part of Belgium. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 70% (N = 627). Psychiatric nurses were frequently confronted with a request for euthanasia, either directly (N = 329, 53%) or through a colleague (N = 427, 69%). A majority (N = 536, 84%) did not object to euthanasia in a psychiatrically ill population with UMS. Confounding factors were the psychiatric diagnosis and the type of ward where the nurses were working. Most participants acknowledged a lack of knowledge and skills to adequately address the euthanasia request (N = 434, 71%). Nearly unanimously (N = 618, 99%), study participants indicated that dealing with euthanasia requests and other end-of-life issues should be part of the formal training of nurses. CONCLUSION: The results highlight the need for ethically sound and comprehensive provision of care. Psychiatric nurses play an important role in dealing with the complex issue of requests for euthanasia. There is also a need for education, training and clear guidelines on the level of health care organizations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0144749

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dutch psychiatric nurses are supportive of patients with different mental disorders to make an informed decision about MAiD-NT, and the majority feel themselves able to address and discuss the issue with their patients.

    “Dutch psychiatric nurses are also supportive of patients with different mental disorders to make an informed decision about MAiD-NT [44] and the majority feel themselves able to address and discuss the issue with their patients [45].”

    From Debating Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Death in People with Psychiatric Disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [45]

    The citation to this paper, [45], is attached to the claim that most nurses felt able to discuss the issue. In Results (Competencies of psychiatric nurses; page unavailable), 88% agreed that a psychiatric nurse should and can discuss euthanasia with a patient. But the study sampled nurses in Dutch-speaking Belgium, not the Netherlands, and 71% said they lacked sufficient knowledge, information and skills to deal with a request. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Hert, M., Van Bos, L., Sweers, K., Wampers, M., De Lepeleire, J., & Correll, C. U.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Sweers, Kim
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-12-23
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
e0144749
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2205636987
Cited by
44
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
euthanasia, psychiatric nurses, nurses' attitudes, end-of-life care, psychiatric inpatients, nurse training, mental health ethics
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Death, Belgium, Euthanasia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Palliative Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review