Cited by 157Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Incidence and Estimated Prevalence of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis in Northeast Italy: A Data Linkage Study

Open access
Morassutto, Caterina, Monasta, Lorenzo, Ricci, Giuseppe, Barbone, Fabio, Ronfani, Luca·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Despite being quite frequent and having serious implications in terms of symptomatology and fertility, data on incidence and prevalence of endometriosis and adenomyosis following gold standard definitions are dramatically lacking. The average time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis in industrialized countries still ranges from five to ten years. Using the regional centralized data linkage system, we calculated incidence and prevalence of endometriosis and adenomyosis in the female population of Friuli Venezia Giulia region, Italy, for the years 2011-2013. Cases were defined as new diagnoses from hospital discharge records, following procedures allowing direct visualization for endometriosis and hysterectomy for adenomyosis, with or without histological confirmation. Diagnoses were considered "new" after verifying women had not been diagnosed in the previous ten years. Incidence of endometriosis and adenomyosis in women aged 15-50 years is 0.14%. Prevalence, estimated from incidence, is 2.00%. Adenomyosis, representing 28% of all diagnoses, becomes increasingly prevalent after the age of 50 years. Our results shows how the study of both endometriosis and adenomyosis should not be limited to women of premenopausal age. Further efforts are needed to sensitize women and health professional, and to find new data linkage possibilities to identify undiagnosed cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0154227

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a population-based study in Northeast Italy, estimated prevalence of adenomyosis is 0.18%, lower than endometriosis at 1.14%.

    “In a rare population-based study, the estimated prevalence of adenomyosis in Northeast Italy is reported to be 0.18%, much lower than that of endometriosis (1.14%) [17].”

    From The Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis vis-à-vis Endometriosis (2020) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Age-specific incidence of adenomyosis peaks at 46-50 years.

    “The age-specific incidence of adenomyosis is very different from that of endometriosis, reaching its peak at the age interval of 46–50 years [17].”

    From The Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis vis-à-vis Endometriosis (2020) · cites this paper as [17]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]Legge regionale 11 ottobre 2012, n. 18. Disposizioni per la tutela delle donne affette da endometriosi. Bollettino Ufficiale Regionale Friuli Venezia Giulia. 2012; 42: 11– 13. Available: http://bur.regione.fvg.it/newbur/downloadPDF?doc=0&name=2012/10/17/BUR%2042_noLEGAL.pdf.
  2. [17]Marwan H, Benagiano G, editors. Uterine Adenomyosis. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG; 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morassutto, C., Monasta, L., Ricci, G., Barbone, F., & Ronfani, L.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT)
  • University of Trieste (IT)
  • University of Udine (IT)
Corresponding author
Monasta, Lorenzo
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-04-21
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
e0154227
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2341654050
Cited by
157
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Regional Health Authority of Friuli Venezia Giulia (Dec. 979/Pren. 16/10/2014)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, adenomyosis, incidence, prevalence, data linkage, hospital discharge data, hysterectomy, delayed diagnosis, women's health, Friuli Venezia Giulia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Italy, Middle Aged, Registries, Incidence, Prevalence, Information Storage and Retrieval, Young Adult, Adenomyosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review