Cited by 373Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Time elapsed from onset of symptoms to diagnosis of endometriosis in a cohort study of Brazilian women

Arruda, M.S.·2003·Human Reproduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to assess the time elapsed between onset of symptoms and diagnosis of endometriosis, and to identify the factors associated with diagnostic delay in a group of Brazilian women. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 200 women with surgically confirmed endometriosis were interviewed at an endometriosis outpatient clinic. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) time elapsed from onset of symptoms until diagnosis of endometriosis was 7.0 (range 3.5-12.1) years. The younger the women at onset of symptoms, the longer the period for diagnosis to be made: the median delay was 12.1 (range 8.0-17.2) years in women aged < or =19 years, and 3.3 (range 2.0-5.5) years in women aged > or =30 years. The median time period between onset of symptoms and diagnosis was 4.0 (2.0-6.0) years for women whose main complaint was infertility, but 7.4 (3.6-13.0) years for those with pelvic pain. CONCLUSIONS: The delay in diagnosis of endometriosis was considered to be long, and especially so for young women with pelvic pain. More information relating to endometriosis should be offered to general physicians and gynaecologists in order to reduce the time taken to diagnose this condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/deg136

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with endometriosis endure symptoms for years without being diagnosed, confirming a worrisome trend and worldwide public health problem.

    “This study thus confirms a worrisome trend and worldwide public health problem: patients with endometriosis endure symptoms for years without being diagnosed (8-12, 27-29).”
  • Past studies have shown that the diagnostic experience is typically longer for those women experiencing pain symptoms as opposed to those experiencing infertility.

    “Past studies have shown that the diagnostic experience is typically longer for those women experiencing pain symptoms as opposed to those experiencing infertility (5, 10)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arruda, M. S.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Corresponding author
Arruda, M.S.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2003-04-01
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
756-759
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2111297082
Cited by
373
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, delayed diagnosis, time to diagnosis, symptom onset, pelvic pain, infertility, age at symptom onset, young women, Brazilian women
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Brazil, Dysmenorrhea, Dyspareunia, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Pelvic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review