Cited by 33Environmental Education and SustainabilityInnovative Human-Technology InteractionEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies

Householders’ Mental Models of Domestic Energy Consumption: Using a Sort-And-Cluster Method to Identify Shared Concepts of Appliance Similarity

Open access
Gabe-Thomas, Elizabeth, Walker, Ian, Verplanken, Bas, Shaddick, Gavin·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

If in-home displays and other interventions are to successfully influence people's energy consumption, they need to communicate about energy in terms that make sense to users. Here we explore householders' perceptions of energy consumption, using a novel combination of card-sorting and clustering to reveal shared patterns in the way people think about domestic energy consumption. The data suggest that, when participants were asked to group appliances which they felt naturally 'went together', there are relatively few shared ideas about which appliances are conceptually related. To the extent participants agreed on which appliances belonged together, these groupings were based on activities (e.g., entertainment) and location within the home (e.g., kitchen); energy consumption was not an important factor in people's categorisations. This suggests messages about behaviour change aimed at reducing energy consumption might better be tied to social practices than to consumption itself.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0158949

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using ML, we can model and cluster individuals based on their climate knowledge, preferences, demographics, and consumption characteristics, and thus predict who will be most amenable to new technologies and sustainable behavior change.

    “Using ML, we can model and cluster individuals based on their climate knowledge, preferences, demographics, and consumption characteristics (e.g., [66,116,166,261,861]), and thus predict who will be most amenable to new technologies and sustainable behavior change.”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [261]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [2]Mayne R, Darby S, Hamilton J. Individual and Social influences on Energy Use. Oxford, UK; 2012. Available: http://media.wix.com/ugd/caf2de_9ca788a582346d11201af07ba0443ac3.pdf
  2. [19]Bostrom A, Morgan M, Fischhoff B, Read D. What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis. 1994; 14 Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00065.x/full PMC6170370 20649942 · DOI
  3. [30]Barnett J. The Multiple Sorting Procedure In: Breakwell GM, editor. Doing Social Psychology Research. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2004 pp. 289– 304
  4. [31]Canter D V. A Multiple Sorting Procedure for Studying Conceptual Systems. In: Psychology in Action. Dartmouth Benchmark Series. Dartmouth Publishing Company, Hantshire, UK. 1996. pp. 71–106. ISBN 1855213656
  5. [32]Tullis T, Wood L. How Many Users Are Enough for a Card-Sorting Study? Proceedings, Usability Professionals Association (UPA) 2004 Conference. Minneapolis, MA; 2004. pp. 1–9.
  6. [37]Mooi E, Sarstedt M. A Concise Guide to Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics Springer; 2011.
  7. [38]Chisik Y. An Image of Electricity: Towards an Understanding of How People Perceive Electricity Interact 2011, part IV, LNCS Lisbon; 2011 pp. 100– 117.
  8. [39]Norušis MJ. Cluster Analysis. IBM SPSS Statistics 19 Statistical Procedures Companion. Prentice-Hall International; 2012. pp. 202–202. Available: http://www.norusis.com/book_SPC_v19.php

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gabe-Thomas, E., Walker, I., Verplanken, B., & Shaddick, G.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-07-28
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
e0158949
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2493182119
Cited by
33
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ESPRC (EP/K002724/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Keywords
household energy consumption, mental models, card sorting, in-home displays, energy behaviour change, social practices, energy communication
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Electricity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Cluster Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review