Cited by 303Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and Treatments

Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Smartphone Addiction

Open access
Lin, Yu-Hsuan, Chiang, Chih-Lin, Lin, Po-Hsien, Chang, Li-Ren, Ko, Chih-Hung, Lee, Yang-Han, Lin, Sheng-Hsuan·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Global smartphone penetration has led to unprecedented addictive behaviors. The aims of this study are to develop diagnostic criteria of smartphone addiction and to examine the discriminative ability and the validity of the diagnostic criteria. METHODS: We developed twelve candidate criteria for characteristic symptoms of smartphone addiction and four criteria for functional impairment caused by excessive smartphone use. The participants consisted of 281 college students. Each participant was systematically assessed for smartphone-using behaviors by psychiatrist's structured diagnostic interview. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the candidate symptom criteria were analyzed with reference to the psychiatrists' clinical global impression. The optimal model selection with its cutoff point of the diagnostic criteria differentiating the smartphone addicted subjects from non-addicted subjects was then determined by the best diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Six symptom criteria model with optimal cutoff point were determined based on the maximal diagnostic accuracy. The proposed smartphone addiction diagnostic criteria consisted of (1) six symptom criteria, (2) four functional impairment criteria and (3) exclusion criteria. Setting three symptom criteria as the cutoff point resulted in the highest diagnostic accuracy (84.3%), while the sensitivity and specificity were 79.4% and 87.5%, respectively. We suggested determining the functional impairment by two or more of the four domains considering the high accessibility and penetration of smartphone use. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic criteria of smartphone addiction demonstrated the core symptoms "impaired control" paralleled with substance related and addictive disorders. The functional impairment involved multiple domains provide a strict standard for clinical assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0163010

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [1]Griffiths M. Gambling on the Internet: A brief note. Journal of Gambling Studies. 1996; 12(4): 471– 3. 10.1007/BF01539190 24234164 · DOI
  2. [3]Slutske WS, Eisen S, True WR, Lyons MJ, Goldberg J, Tsuang M. Common genetic vulnerability for pathological gambling and alcohol dependence in men. Archives of general psychiatry. 2000; 57(7): 666– 73. 10891037
  3. [8]Davey S, Davey A. Assessment of Smartphone Addiction in Indian Adolescents: A Mixed Method Study by Systematic-review and Meta-analysis Approach. International journal of preventive medicine. 2014; 5(12): 1500 25709785 PMC4336980
  4. [9]Demirci K, Orhan H, Demirdas A, Akpınar A, Sert H. Validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale in a younger population. Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2014; 24(3): 226– 34.
  5. [11]Ko CH, Yen JY. The criteria to diagnose internet gaming disorder from causal online gamer. Addiction. 2014; 109(9): 1411– 2. 10.1111/add.12565 25103099 · DOI
  6. [13]Petry NM, Rehbein F, Gentile DA, Lemmens JS, Rumpf HJ, Mossle T, et al An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new DSM-5 approach. Addiction. 2014; 109(9): 1399– 406. 10.1111/add.12457. 24456155 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [14]Lin YH, Lin YC, Lee YH, Lin PH, Lin SH, Chang LR, et al Time distortion associated with smartphone addiction: Identifying smartphone addiction via a mobile application (App). J Psychiatr Res. 2015; 65: 139– 45. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.04.003. 25935253 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [15]Block JJ. Issues for DSM-V: internet addiction. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2008;(165): 306– 7. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07101556 18316427 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [17]Lee H, Ahn H, Choi S, Choi W. The SAMS: Smartphone addiction management system and verification. Journal of medical systems. 2014; 38(1): 1– 10. 10.1007/s10916-013-0001-1 24395031 · DOI
  10. [18]Mok J-Y, Choi S-W, Kim D-J, Choi J-S, Lee J, Ahn H, et al Latent class analysis on internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment. 2014; 10: 817 10.2147/NDT.S59293 24899806 PMC4038421 · DOI
  11. [19]Fu KW, Chan WS, Wong PW, Yip PS. Internet addiction: prevalence, discriminant validity and correlates among adolescents in Hong Kong. The British journal of psychiatry: the journal of mental science. 2010; 196(6): 486– 92. 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.075002. 20513862 · DOI
  12. [20]Tao R, Huang X, Wang J, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Li M. Proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Addiction. 2010; 105(3): 556– 64. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02828.x 20403001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [21]Van Rooij AJ, Schoenmakers TM, Vermulst AA, Van Den Eijnden RJ, Van De Mheen D. Online video game addiction: identification of addicted adolescent gamers. Addiction. 2011; 106(1): 205– 12. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03104.x 20840209 · DOI
  14. [22]Ko CH, Yen JY, Chen CC, Chen SH, Yen CF. Proposed diagnostic criteria of Internet addiction for adolescents. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005; 193(11): 728– 33.. 16260926
  15. [23]Ko CH, Yen JY, Chen SH, Yang MJ, Lin HC, Yen CF. Proposed diagnostic criteria and the screening and diagnosing tool of Internet addiction in college students. Compr Psychiatry. 2009; 50(4): 378– 84. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.05.019. 19486737 · DOI
  16. [24]West R. Theories of addiction. Addiction. 2001; 96(1): 3– 13. 10.1080/09652140020016923 11177516 · DOI
  17. [25]Lin YH LP, Chiang CL, Lee YH, Yang Cheryl CH, Kuo Terry BJ, Lin SH. Incorporation of Mobile Application (App) Measures into the Diagnosis of Smartphone Addiction. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (in press). 2016. 28146615
  18. [26]Billieux J, Maurage P, Lopez-Fernandez O, Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Current Addiction Reports. 2015; 2(2): 156– 62.
  19. [27]Metcalf O, Pammer K. Impulsivity and related neuropsychological features in regular and addictive first person shooter gaming. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2014; 17(3): 147– 52. 23971428

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, Y.-H., Chiang, C.-L., Lin, P.-H., Chang, L.-R., Ko, C.-H., Lee, Y.-H., & Lin, S.-H.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
  • Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
  • Tamkang University (TW)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Lin, Sheng-Hsuan
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-11-15
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
e0163010
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2551806290
Cited by
303
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
41.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Tamkang University Institutional Repository (TKUIR) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
  • National Taiwan University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
smartphone addiction, diagnostic criteria, functional disability, impaired control, university students, diagnostic accuracy, symptom criteria, exclusion criteria, substance-related and addictive disorders
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Logistic Models, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review