Cited by 110Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and fetal healthcareInnovations in Medical Education

Knowledge and Skills of Healthcare Providers in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia before and after Competency-Based Training in Emergency Obstetric and Early Newborn Care

Open access
Ameh, Charles A., Kerr, Robert, Madaj, Barbara, Mdegela, Mselenge, Kana, Terry, Jones, Susan, Lambert, Jaki, Dickinson, Fiona +2 more·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare provider training in Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmOC&NC) is a component of 65% of intervention programs aimed at reducing maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity. It is important to evaluate the effectiveness of this. METHODS: We evaluated knowledge and skills among 5,939 healthcare providers before and after 3-5 days 'skills and drills' training in emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmOC&NC) conducted in 7 sub-Saharan Africa countries (Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Zimbabwe) and 2 Asian countries (Bangladesh, Pakistan). Standardised assessments using multiple choice questions and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) were used to measure change in knowledge and skills and the Improvement Ratio (IR) by cadre and by country. Linear regression was performed to identify variables associated with pre-training score and IR. RESULTS: 99.7% of healthcare providers improved their overall score with a median (IQR) increase of 10.0% (5.0% - 15.0%) for knowledge and 28.8% (23.1% - 35.1%) for skill. There were significant improvements in knowledge and skills for each cadre of healthcare provider and for each country (p<0.05). The mean IR was 56% for doctors, 50% for mid-level staff and nurse-midwives and 38% for nursing-aides. A teaching job, previous in-service training, and higher percentage of work-time spent providing maternity care were each associated with a higher pre-training score. Those with more than 11 years of experience in obstetrics had the lowest scores prior to training, with mean IRs 1.4% lower than for those with no more than 2 years of experience. The largest IR was for recognition and management of obstetric haemorrhage (49-70%) and the smallest for recognition and management of obstructed labour and use of the partograph (6-15%). CONCLUSIONS: Short in-service EmOC&NC training was associated with improved knowledge and skills for all cadres of healthcare providers working in maternity wards in both sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Additional support and training is needed for use of the partograph as a tool to monitor progress in labour. Further research is needed to assess if this is translated into improved service delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0167270

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]van den Broek N. Life Saving Skills Manual: Essential Obstetric and Newborn Care. London: RCOG Press, 2006, revised 2007.
  2. [24]Kirkpatrick D. Revisiting Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Model, Great ideas revisited series. Training Dev 1996; 50: 54– 9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ameh, C. A., Kerr, R., Madaj, B., Mdegela, M., Kana, T., Jones, S., Lambert, J., Dickinson, F., White, S., & van den Broek, N.
Affiliations
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Madaj, Barbara
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-12-22
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
e0167270
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2569050240
Cited by
109
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Department for International Development (GB) (202945-101)
  • UNICEF (43144788)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
emergency obstetric and newborn care, competency-based training, in-service training, obstetric hemorrhage management, obstructed labor, partograph, obstetric care, maternal mortality, neonatal mortality, sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, mid-level health workers, nurses and midwives
MeSH terms
Asia, Emergency Treatment, Health Personnel, Humans, Infant Care, Infant, Newborn, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Program Evaluation, Linear Models, Africa South of the Sahara, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review