Cited by 287Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesLinguistic and Cultural StudiesPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications

An ethnobotanical survey of indigenous medicinal plants in Hafizabad district, Punjab-Pakistan

Open access
Umair, Muhammad, Altaf, Muhammad, Abbasi, Arshad Mehmood·2017·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Present paper offers considerable information on traditional uses of medicinal plants by the inhabitants of Hafizabad district, Punjab-Pakistan. This is the first quantitative ethnobotanical study from the area comprising popularity level of medicinal plant species intendedby using relative popularity level (RPL) and rank order priority (ROP) indices.Ethnobotanical data were collected by interviewing 166 local informants and 35 traditional health practioners (THPs) from different localities of Hafizabad district. Demographic features of informants; life form, part used, methods of preparation, modes of application and ethnomedicinal uses were documented. Ethnobotanical data were analyzed using quantitative tools, i.e. Relative frequency citation (RFC), use value (UV), informant consensus factor (ICF) fidelity level (FL), RPL and ROP indices. A total of 85 species belonging to 71 genera and 34 families were documented along with ethnomedicinal uses. Solanum surattense, Withania somnifera, Cyperus rotundus, Solanum nigrum and Melia azedarach were the most utilized medicinal plant species with highest used value. The reported ailments were classified into 11 disease categories based on ICF values and highest number of plant species was reported to treat dermatological and gastrointestinal disorders. Withania somnifera and Ranunculus sceleratus with maximum FL (100%), were used against gastrointestinal and urinary disorders, respectively. The RPL and ROP values were calculated to recognize the folk medicinal plant wealth; six out of 32 plant species (19%) were found popular, based on citation by more than half of the maximum number of informant viz. 26. Consequently, the ROP value for these species was more than 75. The comparative assessment with reported literature revealed 15% resemblance and 6% variation to previous data;however79% uses of the reported species were recorded for the first time. The diversity of medicinal plant species and associated traditional knowledge is significant in primary health care system. Medicinal plant species with high RPL values should be screened for comprehensive phytochemical and pharmacological studies. This could be useful in novel drug discovery and to validate the ethomendicinal knowledge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0177912

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]Njoroge G, Bussmann R, Gemmill B, Newton L, Ngumi V. Utilization of weed species as source of traditional medicines in central Kenya. Lyonia. 2004; 7: 71– 87.
  2. [30]Raunkiær C. Plant life forms Oxford: Oxford University Press 1937.
  3. [50]Jeffrey C. In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C, editors. Compositae: Introduction with key to tribes Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, vol VIII, Flowering Plants, Eudicots, Asterales. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (2007).
  4. [67]Bernhoft A. Bioactive compounds in plants—Benefits and risks for man and animals. The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Oslo 2010.
  5. [87]Vendruscolo G, Mentz A. Ethnobotanical survey of the medicinal plants used by the community of Ponta Grossa neighborhood, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Iherigia Série Botânica. 2006; 61: 83– 103.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Umair, M., Altaf, M., & Abbasi, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Women University of Azad Jammu & Kashmir Bagh (PK)
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
Corresponding author
Abbasi, Arshad Mehmood
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2017-06-02
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
e0177912
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620673035
Cited by
287
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 9
FWCI
18.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Linguistic and Cultural Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
Keywords
medicinal plants, ethnomedicine, traditional knowledge, Withania somnifera, Solanum surattense, Cyperus rotundus, Melia azedarach, Ranunculus sceleratus, Solanum nigrum, skin diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, urinary disorders, traditional healers, folk medicine, primary care, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Pakistan, Plants, Medicinal, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review