Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A new approach for the analysis of facial growth and age estimation: Iris ratio

Machado, Carlos Eduardo Palhares, Flores, Marta Regina Pinheiro, Lima, Laíse Nascimento Correia, Tinoco, Rachel Lima Ribeiro, Franco, Ademir, Bezerra, Ana Cristina Barreto, Evison, Martin Paul, Guimarães, Marco Aurélio·2017·PLOS ONE

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0180330

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. JS Huxley, 1936, Terminology of relative growth, Nature, 137, 780, 10.1038/137780b0 · DOI
  2. J Gayon, 2000, History of the concept of allometry, Amer Zool, 40, 748
  3. RR Ackermann, 2002, Common patterns of facial ontogeny in the hominid lineage, Anat Rec, 269, 142, 10.1002/ar.10119 · DOI
  4. B Zebrick, 2014, ACTN3 R577X genotypes associate with class II and deep bite malocclusions, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146, 603, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.021 · DOI
  5. MM Chakravarty, 2011, Automated analysis craniofacial morphology using magnetic resonance images, PLoS One, 6, e20241, 10.1371/journal.pone.0020241 · DOI · Paper page
  6. RSS Kramer, 2012, A lack of sexual dimorphism in width-to-height ratio in white European faces using 2D photographs, 3D scans, and anthropometry, PLoS One, 7, e427705
  7. RT Bergman, 2014, Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years, Angle Orthod, 84, 48, 10.2319/041513-291.1 · DOI
  8. MS Goldstein, 1936, Changes in dimensions and form of the face and head with age, Am J Phys Anthrop, 22, 37, 10.1002/ajpa.1330220104 · DOI
  9. LS Fishman, 1979, Chronological versus skeletal age, an evaluation of craniofacial growth, Angle Orthod, 49, 181
  10. M Kuc-Michalskaa, 2010, Duration of the pubertal peak in skeletal class I and class III subjects, Angle Orthod, 80, 54, 10.2319/020309-69.1 · DOI
  11. VF Ferrario, 1999, Soft-tissue facial morphometry from 6 yars to adulthood: a three-dimensional growth study using a new modeling, Plastic Reconstr Surg, 103, 768, 10.1097/00006534-199903000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  12. C Cattaneo, 2009, The difficult issue of age assessment on pedo-pornographic material, Forensi Sci Int, 183, e21, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.09.005 · DOI
  13. C Cattaneo, 2012, Can facial proportions taken from images be of use for ageing in cases of suspected child pornography? A pilot study, Int J Legal Med, 126, 139, 10.1007/s00414-011-0564-7 · DOI
  14. MP Evison, 2010, Computer-aided forensic facial comparison, 10.1201/9781439811344 · DOI
  15. C Stavrianos, 2012, Facial mapping: review of current methods, Res J Med Sci, 6, 77, 10.3923/rjmsci.2012.77.82 · DOI
  16. JP Driessen, 2011, New insights into facial anthropometry in digital photographs using iris dependent calibration, Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 75, 579, 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.01.023 · DOI
  17. A Schmeling, 2008, Criteria for age estimation in living individuals, Int J Legal Med, 122, 457, 10.1007/s00414-008-0254-2 · DOI
  18. A Olze, 2008, Studies of the chronological course of wisdom tooth eruption in a German population, J Forensic Leg Med, 15, 436, 10.1016/j.jflm.2008.02.008 · DOI
  19. V Santoro, 2009, Forensic age estimation of living individuals: a retrospective analysis, Forensic Sci Int, 193, 129.e1
  20. A Olze, 2007, Studies of the chronological course of the wisdom tooth in a Black African population, J Forensic Sci, 52, 1161, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00534.x · DOI
  21. PM Garamendi, 2005, Reliability of the method applied to assess age of minority in living subjects around 18 years old. A survey on Moroccan origin population, Forensic Sci Int, 154, 3, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.08.018 · DOI
  22. A Schmeling, 2004, Forensic age diagnostics of living people undergoing criminal proceeding, Forensic Sci Int, 144, 243, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.059 · DOI
  23. E Cunha, 2009, The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: a review, Forensic Sci Int, 193, 1, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  24. RC Augusteyn, 2012, Human ocular biometry, Exp Eye Res, 102, 70, 10.1016/j.exer.2012.06.009 · DOI
  25. C Flores-Mir, 2004, Use of skeletal maturation based on hand-wrist radiographic analysis as a predictor of facial growth: a systematic review, Angle Orthod, 74, 118
  26. C Wilkinson, 2012, Craniofacial identification, 10.1017/CBO9781139049566 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Machado, C. E. P., Flores, M. R. P., Lima, L. N. C., Tinoco, R. L. R., Franco, A., Bezerra, A. C. B., Evison, M. P., & Guimarães, M. A.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2017-07-07
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
e0180330
ISSN
1932-6203
Cited by
40
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review