Cited by 46Antibiotic Use and ResistancePharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Evidence of superficial knowledge regarding antibiotics and their use: Results of two cross-sectional surveys in an urban informal settlement in Kenya

Open access
Omulo, Sylvia, Thumbi, Samuel M., Lockwood, Svetlana, Verani, Jennifer R., Bigogo, Godfrey, Masyongo, Geoffrey, Call, Douglas R.·2017·PLOS ONE

Abstract

We assessed knowledge and practices related to antibiotic use in Kibera, an urban informal settlement in Kenya. Surveys was employed at the beginning (entry) and again at the end (exit) of a 5-month longitudinal study of AMR. Two-hundred households were interviewed at entry, of which 149 were also interviewed at exit. The majority (>65%) of respondents in both surveys could name at least one antibiotic, with amoxicillin and cotrimoxazole jointly accounting for 85% and 77% of antibiotics mentioned during entry and exit, respectively. More than 80% of respondents felt antibiotics should not be shared or discontinued following the alleviation of symptoms. Nevertheless, 66% and 74% of respondents considered antibiotics effective for treating colds and flu in the entry and exit surveys, respectively. There was a high (87%, entry; 70% exit) level of reported antibiotic use (past 12 months) mainly for colds/flu, coughs and fever, with >80% of respondents obtaining antibiotics from health facilities and pharmacies. Less than half of respondents remembered getting information on the correct use of antibiotics, although 100% of those who did reported improved attitudes towards antibiotic use. Clinicians and community pharmacists were highly trusted information sources. Paired household responses (n = 149) generally showed improved knowledge and attitudes by the exit survey although practices were largely unchanged. Weak agreement (κ = -0.003 to 0.22) between survey responses suggest both that unintended learning had not occurred, and that participant responses were not based on established knowledge or behaviors. Targeted public education regarding antibiotics is needed to address this gap.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0185827

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Residents may not recall the types of antibiotics they have recently consumed or the frequency with which they have consumed them when self-reporting.

    “Objective measurements are preferred since residents may not recall the types of”

    From Urban informal settlements as hotspots of antimicrobial resistance and the need to curb environmental transmission. (2020) · cites this paper as [118]

    The Discussion reports poor recall of antibiotic names among residents of the surveyed Kenyan villages, supporting the concern about self-reported types. The Results (Sources of antibiotics and antibiotic use practices) report whether respondents said they had used an antibiotic in the past year, but the paper does not establish that they misremembered how frequently they used antibiotics. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. SI Kheder, 2013, a Survey of Public Knowledge and Behavior Related To Antibiotic Use and, Int J Bioassays, 2, 751

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Omulo, S., Thumbi, S. M., Lockwood, S., Verani, J. R., Bigogo, G., Masyongo, G., & Call, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Call, Douglas R.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2017-10-02
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
e0185827
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2763187924
Cited by
46
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Allen School
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
antibiotic knowledge, antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance, informal settlements, Kibera, antibiotic prescribing, public health education, amoxicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, unintended learning
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Kenya, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Urban Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review