Cited by 110

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Satellite imagery-based monitoring of archaeological site damage in the Syrian civil war

Casana, Jesse, Laugier, Elise Jakoby·2017·PLOS ONE

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0188589

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. S Al Quntar, 2015, Responding to a Cultural Heritage Crisis: The Example of the Safeguarding the Heritage of Syria and Iraq Project, Near Eastern Archaeology, 78, 154, 10.5615/neareastarch.78.3.0154 · DOI
  2. Ö Harmanşah, 2015, ISIS, Heritage, and the Spectacles of Destruction in the Global Media, Near Eastern Archaeology, 78, 170, 10.5615/neareastarch.78.3.0170 · DOI
  3. MD Danti, 2015, Ground-Based Observations of Cultural Heritage Incidents in Syria and Iraq, Near Eastern Archaeology, 78, 132, 10.5615/neareastarch.78.3.0132 · DOI
  4. M Danti, 2017, The American Schools of Oriental Research Cultural Heritage Initiatives: Monitoring Cultural Heritage in Syria and Northern Iraq by Geospatial Imagery, Geosciences, 7, 95, 10.3390/geosciences7040095 · DOI
  5. J Casana, 2015, Satellite Imagery-Based Analysis of Archaeological Looting in Syria, Near Eastern Archaeology, 78, 142, 10.5615/neareastarch.78.3.0142 · DOI
  6. J Casana, 2014, Satellite-Based Monitoring of Looting and Damage to Archaeological Sites in Syria. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology &, Heritage Studies, 2, 128
  7. Cunliffe EL. Satellites and site destruction: an analysis of modern impacts on the archaeological resource of the ancient Near East. [Internet]. Ph.D. Dissertation, Durham University. 2013. Available: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8472/
  8. EC Stone, 2008, Patterns of looting in southern Iraq, Antiquity, 82, 125, 10.1017/S0003598X00096496 · DOI
  9. EC Stone, 2015, An Update on the Looting of Archaeological Sites in Iraq, Near Eastern Archaeology, 78, 178, 10.5615/neareastarch.78.3.0178 · DOI
  10. DA Contreras, 2010, Shining Light on Looting: Using Google Earth to Quantify Damage and Raise Public Awareness, SAA Archaeological Record, 10, 30
  11. DA Contreras, 2010, The Utility of Publicly-Available Satellite Imagery for Investigating Looting of Archaeological Sites in Jordan, Journal of Field Archaeology, 35, 101, 10.1179/009346910X12707320296838 · DOI · Paper page
  12. S Parcak, 2017, Using Open Access Satellite Data Alongside Ground Based Remote Sensing: An Assessment, with Case Studies from Egypt’s Delta, Geosciences, 7, 94, 10.3390/geosciences7040094 · DOI
  13. J Casana, 2014, Regional-Scale Archaeological Remote Sensing in the Age of Big Data. Advances in Archaeological Practice, A Journal of the Society for American Archaeology, 2, 222
  14. EM Meyers, 1997, American Schools of Oriental Research. The Oxford encyclopedia of archaeology in the Near East
  15. J Casana, 2012, Swords into Ploughshares: Archaeological Applications of CORONA Satellite Imagery in the Near East, Internet Archaeology, 32
  16. J Ur, 2013, SPYING ON THE PAST: Declassified Intelligence Satellite Photographs and Near Eastern Landscapes, Near Eastern Archaeology, 76, 28, 10.5615/neareastarch.76.1.0028 · DOI · Paper page
  17. T Kalayci, 2016, Settlement Sizes and Agricultural Production Territories: A Remote Sensing Case Study for the Early Bronze Age in Upper Mesopotamia, STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research, 2, 217, 10.1080/20548923.2016.1247512 · DOI
  18. S Parcak, 2015, Archaeological Looting in Egypt: A Geospatial View (Case Studies from Saqqara, Lisht, and el Hibeh), Near Eastern Archaeology, 78, 196, 10.5615/neareastarch.78.3.0196 · DOI
  19. E Cunliffe, 2014, Remote Assessments of Site Damage: A New Ontology, International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era, 3, 453, 10.1260/2047-4970.3.3.453 · DOI
  20. A Lauricella, 2017, Semi-automated detection of looting in Afghanistan using multispectral imagery and principal component analysis, Antiquity, 91, 1344, 10.15184/aqy.2017.90 · DOI
  21. R Lasaponara, 2014, Investigating archaeological looting using satellite images and GEORADAR: the experience in Lambayeque in North Peru, Journal of Archaeological Science, 42, 216, 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.032 · DOI
  22. D Tapete, 2016, ‘Looting marks’ in space-borne SAR imagery: Measuring rates of archaeological looting in Apamea (Syria) with TerraSAR-X Staring Spotlight, Remote Sensing of Environment, 178, 42, 10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.055 · DOI
  23. RE Dewar, 1991, Incorporating Variation in Occupation Span into Settlement-Pattern Analysis, American Antiquity, 56, 604, 10.2307/281539 · DOI
  24. Falsone G. Tell Shiyukh Tahtani. In: del Olmo Lete G, Montero Fenollós J-L, editors. Archaeology of the Upper Syrian Euphrates the Tishrin dam Area: proceedings of the international symposium held at Barcelona, January 28 th - 30th 1998. Sabadell (Barcelona), Spain: AUSA; 1999. pp. 137–142.
  25. P Sconzo, 2007, Collapse or Continuity? The case of the EB-MB Transition at Tell Shiyukh Tahtani, Varia Anatolica, 19, 267
  26. J Schuetter, 2013, Autodetection of ancient Arabian tombs in high-resolution satellite imagery, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34, 6611, 10.1080/01431161.2013.802054 · DOI · Paper page
  27. BH Menze, 2012, Mapping Patterns of Long-Term Settlement in Northern Mesopotamia at a Large Scale, PNAS, 109, E778, 10.1073/pnas.1115472109 · DOI · Paper page
  28. ØD Trier, 2009, Automatic detection of circular structures in high-resolution satellite images of agricultural land, Archaeol Prospect, 16, 1, 10.1002/arp.339 · DOI
  29. EFW Bowen, 2017, Algorithmic Identification of Looted Archaeological Sites from Space, Front ICT, 4
  30. Bonacchi C, Bevan A, Pett D, Keinan-Schoonbaert A. Crowd- and Community-Fuelled Archaeological Research. Early Results from the MicroPasts Project. Proceedings of the Conference Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. 2015. pp. 279–288. Available: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1486104/
  31. Duffton A, Ogden J. Decolonizing Digital Archaeology. Session Abstract for the Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology meeting, 2017. In: CAA 2017 Conference [Internet]. 2016 [cited 15 Nov 2016]. Available: http://2017.caaconference.org/program/sessions/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Casana, J., & Laugier, E. J.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2017-11-30
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
e0188589
ISSN
1932-6203
Cited by
110
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review