Cited by 22Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePrimary Care and Health OutcomesEmpathy and Medical Education

Providers’ perceptions of communication with patients in primary healthcare in Rwanda

Open access
Cubaka, Vincent Kalumire, Schriver, Michael, Cotton, Philip, Nyirazinyoye, Laetitia, Kallestrup, Per·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delivery of effective healthcare is contingent on the quality of communication between the patient and the healthcare provider. Little is known about primary healthcare providers' perceptions of communication with patients in Rwanda. AIM: To explore providers' perceptions of patient-provider communication (PPC) and analyse the ways in which providers present and reflect on communication practice and problems. METHODS: Qualitative, in-depth, semi structured interviews with nine primary health care providers. An abductive analysis supplemented by the framework method was applied. A narrative approach allowed the emergence of archetypical narratives on PPC. RESULTS: Providers shared rich reflections on the importance of proper communication with patients and appeared committed to making their interaction work optimally. Still, providers had difficulty critically analysing limitations of their communication in practice. Reported communication issues included lack of communication training as well as time and workload issues. Two archetypes of narratives on PPC issues and practice emerged and are discussed. CONCLUSION: While providers' narratives put patients at the centre of care, there were indications that patient-provider communication training and practice need further development. In-depth exploration of highlighted issues and adapted strategies to tackle communication drawbacks are prerequisites to improvement. This study contributes to the advancement of knowledge related to communication between the patient and the provider in a resource-limited setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0195269

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cubaka, V. K., Schriver, M., Cotton, P., Nyirazinyoye, L., & Kallestrup, P.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Rwanda (RW)
Corresponding author
Cubaka, Vincent Kalumire
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-04-04
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
e0195269
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795590958
Cited by
22
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
patient-provider communication, primary care providers, provider perceptions, communication training, workload, resource-limited settings, Rwanda, archetypal narrative, quality of care
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Primary Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Rwanda, Qualitative Research, Health Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review