Cited by 89Health and Conflict StudiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Evaluating the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health services during humanitarian crises: A systematic review

Open access
Singh, Neha S., Smith, James, Aryasinghe, Sarindi, Khosla, Rajat, Say, Lale, Blanchet, Karl·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An estimated 32 million women and girls of reproductive age living in emergency situations, all of whom require sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information and services. This systematic review assessed the effect of SRH interventions, including the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) on a range of health outcomes from the onset of emergencies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE and PsychINFO databases from January 1, 1980 to April 10, 2017. This review was registered with the PROSPERO database with identifier number CRD42017082102. We found 29 studies meet the inclusion criteria. We found high quality evidence to support the effectiveness of specific SRH interventions, such as home visits and peer-led educational and counselling, training of lower-level health care providers, community health workers (CHWs) to promote SRH services, a three-tiered network of health workers providing reproductive and maternal health services, integration of HIV and SRH services, and men's discussion groups for reducing intimate partner violence. We found moderate quality evidence to support transport-based referral systems, community-based SRH education, CHW delivery of injectable contraceptives, wider literacy programmes, and birth preparedness interventions. No studies reported interventions related to fistulae, and only one study focused on abortion services. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased attention to SRH in humanitarian crises, the sector has made little progress in advancing the evidence base for the effectiveness of SRH interventions, including the MISP, in crisis settings. A greater quantity and quality of more timely research is needed to ascertain the effectiveness of delivering SRH interventions in a variety of humanitarian crises.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0199300

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The past decade has seen a push toward understanding ANC utilization behavior and the effects of targeted community-based programs in crisis settings.

    “The past decade has seen a push toward understanding ANC utilization behavior and the effects of targeted community-based programs, including the training of community health workers, home visits, and peer-led educational campaigns on ANC utilization and facility-based deliveries in crisis settings [18, 28–30].”

    From Predictors of antenatal care utilization among the Rohingya population in the refugee camps of Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh (2025) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results (Pregnancy & maternal and newborn health; page unavailable) review community-health-worker education, home visits, and education campaigns in crisis settings, with reported outcomes for antenatal visits or facility-based delivery. This supports the claim’s broad point about studying community-based programs, but the copy does not identify the ANC campaigns as peer-led or specifically describe a push to understand ANC utilization behavior. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. [3]Singh NS, Huicho L, Afnan-Holmes H, John T, Moran AC, Colbourn T, et al Countdown to 2015 country case studies: systematic tools to address the "black box" of health systems and policy assessment. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16 Suppl 2: 790 doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3402-5; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5025822. 27634035 PMC5025822 · DOI
  2. [5]Peterson K. From the field: gender issues in disaster response and recovery. Nat Hazards Obs. 1997; 21: 3– 4.
  3. [8]Austin J, Guy S, Lee-Jones L, McGinn T, Schlecht J. Reproductive health: a right for refugees and internally displaced persons. Reprod Health Matters. 2008; 16(31): 10– 21. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31351-2. 18513603 · DOI
  4. [9]Report of the International Conference on Population and Development International Conference on Population and Development; New York: United Nations 1994.
  5. [10]Schreck L. Turning point: A special report on the refugee reproductive health field. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2000; 26(4): 162– 6.
  6. [12]Onyango MA, Hixson BL, McNally S. Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for reproductive health during emergencies: time for a new paradigm? Global Public Health. 2013; 8(3): 342– 56. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2013.765024.. 23394618 · DOI
  7. [13]Casey SE. Evaluations of reproductive health programs in humanitarian settings: a systematic review. Confl Health. 2015; 9(1): S1 doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-9-S1-S1; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4328944. 25685183 PMC4328944 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [15]Warren E, Post N, Hossain M, Blanchet K, Roberts B. Systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian crises. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(12). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008226.. PMC4691726 26685020 · DOI
  9. [16]Blanchet K, Ramesh A, Frison S, Warren E, Hossain M, Smith J, et al Evidence on public health interventions in humanitarian crises. Lancet. 2017; 390(10109): 2287– 96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30768-1. 28602563 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [17]Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS medicine. 2009; 6 (7). PMC2707599 19621072
  11. [20]Lisam S. Minimum initial service package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health in disasters. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 2014; 7(4): 245– 8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12130.. 25586453 · DOI
  12. [21]Nyamtema AS, Urassa DP, van Roosmalen J. Maternal health interventions in resource limited countries: a systematic review of packages, impacts and factors for change. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2011; 11: 30 doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-30; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3090370. 21496315 PMC3090370 · DOI
  13. [22]Warren E, Post N, Hossain M, Blanchet K, Roberts B. Systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian crises. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(12): e008226 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008226; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4691726. 26685020 PMC4691726 · DOI
  14. [23]Knottnerus A, Tugwell P. STROBE—a checklist to Strengthen the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61(4): 323 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.006 18313555 · DOI
  15. [24]Altman DG. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 1996; 313(7057): 570– 1.; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2352018. 8806240 PMC2352018
  16. [25]Howard N, Kollie S, Souare Y, von Roenne A, Blankhart D, Newey C, et al Reproductive health services for refugees by refugees in Guinea I: family planning. Confl Health. 2008; 2: 12 doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-2-12; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2579911. 18925936 PMC2579911 · DOI
  17. [26]Casey SE, McNab SE, Tanton C, Odong J, Testa AC, Lee-Jones L. Availability of long-acting and permanent family-planning methods leads to increase in use in conflict-affected northern Uganda: Evidence from cross-sectional baseline and endline cluster surveys. [References]. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice. 2013; 8(3): 284– 97. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2012.758302. PMC3613974 23305269 · DOI
  18. [27]Adam IF. Evidence from cluster surveys on the association between home-based counseling and use of family planning in conflict-affected Darfur. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2016; 133(2): 221– 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.09.023.. 26873127 · DOI
  19. [28]Larsen MM, Sartie MT, Musa T, Casey SE, Tommy J, Saldinger M. Changes in HIV/AIDS/STI knowledge, attitudes and practices among commercial sex workers and military forces in Port Loko, Sierra Leone. Disasters. 2004; 28(3): 239– 54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00256.x.. 15344939 · DOI
  20. [29]Casey SE, Larsen MM, McGinn T, Sartie M, Dauda M, Lahai P. Changes in HIV/AIDS/STI knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours among the youth in Port Loko, Sierra Leone. Global public health. 2006; 1(3): 249– 63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441690600668106.. 19153910 · DOI
  21. [30]O'Brien DP, Venis S, Greig J, Shanks L, Ellman T, Sabapathy K, et al Provision of antiretroviral treatment in conflict settings: the experience of Médecins Sans Frontières. Conflict and health. 2010; 4(1): 12. 20553624 PMC2911421
  22. [31]Logie CH, Daniel C, Newman PA, Weaver J, Loutfy MR. A psycho-educational HIV/STI prevention intervention for internally displaced women in Leogane, Haiti: results from a non-randomized cohort pilot study. PloS one. 2014; 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089836.. PMC3938530 24587068 · DOI
  23. [32]McPherson RA, Neena K, Moore JM, Meena S. Are birth-preparedness programmes effective? Results from a field trial in Siraha District, Nepal. (Special issue: Reproductive and newborn health.). Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2006; 24(4): 479– 88.. PMC3001152 17591345
  24. [34]Adam IF. The influence of maternal health education on the place of delivery in conflict settings of Darfur, Sudan. Conflict and Health. 2015; 9(31). PMC4593219 26442130
  25. [35]Adam IF, Nakamura K, Kizuki M, Al Rifai R, Vanching U. Relationship between implementing interpersonal communication and mass education campaigns in emergency settings and use of reproductive healthcare services: Evidence from Darfur, Sudan. BMJ Open. 2015; 5 (9) (no pagination)(e008285). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008285.. PMC4577869 26373400 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [36]Castillo MS, Corsino MA, Calibo AP, Zeck W, Capili DS, Andrade LC, et al Turning disaster into an opportunity for quality improvement in essential intrapartum and newborn care services in the philippines: Pre- to posttraining assessments. BioMed Research International. 2016; 2016 (no pagination)(6264249). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6264249.. PMC4925981 27403432 · DOI
  27. [37]Pham K, Sharpe EC, Weiss WM, Vu A. The use of a lot quality assurance sampling methodology to assess and manage primary health interventions in conflict-affected West Darfur, Sudan. Popul Health Metr. 2016; 14: 34 doi: 10.1186/s12963-016-0103-3; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5053218. 27757070 PMC5053218 · DOI
  28. [38]Gupta J, Falb KL, Lehmann H, Kpebo D, Xuan Z, Hossain M, et al Gender norms and economic empowerment intervention to reduce intimate partner violence against women in rural Côte d’Ivoire: a randomized controlled pilot study. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 2013; 13(1): 46 doi: 10.1186/1472-698x-13-46 24176132 PMC3816202 · DOI
  29. [41]McGinn T, Allen K. Improving refugees' reproductive health through literacy in Guinea. Global public health. 2006; 1(3): 229– 48. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441690600680002.. 19153909 · DOI
  30. [43]Zaman RU, Tehzeeb Z, Rashid N, Allen S, Iftikhar C, Shafique A, et al Evaluating primary healthcare service revitalization interventions though a knowledge, practice and coverage survey in earthquake-affected areas in Pakistan. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology. 2013; 5(5): 228– 36..
  31. [44]Bannink-Mbazzi F, Lowicki-Zucca M, Ojom L, Kabasomi SV, Esiru G, Homsy J. High PMTCT program uptake and coverage of mothers, their partners, and babies in northern Uganda: achievements and lessons learned over 10 years of implementation (2002–2011). Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2013; 62(5): e138– 45. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318282d27f. 23274930 · DOI
  32. [45]Huber D, Saeedi N, Samadi AK. Achieving success with family planning in rural Afghanistan. Bull World Health Organ. 2010; 88(3): 227– 31. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.059410; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2828781. 20428392 PMC2828781 · DOI
  33. [46]Curry DW, Rattan J, Huang SY, Noznesky E. Delivering high-quality family planning services in crisis-affected settings II: Results. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2015; 3(1): 25– 33. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00112.. PMC4356273 25745118 · DOI · Paper page
  34. [47]Culbert H, Tu D, O'Brien DP, Ellman T, Mills C, Ford N, et al HIV treatment in a conflict setting: outcomes and experiences from Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. PLoS Medicine / Public Library of Science. 2007; 4(5): e129 https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040129.. 17535100 PMC1880839 · DOI
  35. [48]Samai O, Sengeh P. Facilitating emergency obstetric care through transportation and communication, Bo, Sierra Leone. The Bo PMM Team. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics. 1997; 59 Suppl 2: S157– 64. 9389627
  36. [49]Purdin S, Khan T, Saucier R. Reducing maternal mortality among Afghan refugees in Pakistan. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2009; 105(1): 82– 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.12.021.. 19232603 · DOI
  37. [51]Groppi L, Somigliana E, Pisani V, Ika M, Mabor JL, Akec HN. A hospital-centered approach to improve emergency obstetric care in South Sudan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 128 doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.031 25270823 · DOI
  38. [52]Raheel H, Karim MS, Saleem S, Bharwani S. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Contraception among Afghan Refugee Women in Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study. PloS one. 2012; 7 (11) (no pagination)(e48760). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048760.. PMC3487847 23133658 · DOI · Paper page
  39. [53]Leigh B, Kandeh HB, Kanu MS, Kuteh M, Palmer IS, Daoh KS, et al Improving emergency obstetric care at a district hospital, Makeni, Sierra Leone. The Freetown/Makeni PMM Team. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics. 1997; 59 Suppl 2: S55– 65.. 9389614
  40. [54]da Costa BR, Cevallos M, Altman DG, Rutjes AW, Egger M. Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study. BMJ Open. 2011; 1(1): e000048 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2010-000048; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3191404. 22021739 PMC3191404 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, N. S., Smith, J., Aryasinghe, S., Khosla, R., Say, L., & Blanchet, K.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Singh, Neha S.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-07-06
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
e0199300
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2819945901
Cited by
89
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
sexual and reproductive health, humanitarian crisis, emergency situations, health service effectiveness, community health workers, home visits, intimate partner violence, childbirth preparation, obstetric care, health professions education, health literacy
MeSH terms
Community Health Workers, Contraceptive Agents, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Pregnancy, Relief Work, Sexual Behavior, Global Health, Reproductive Health Services, Reproductive Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review