Cited by 53Reproductive Health and ContraceptionGlobal Maternal and Child HealthHealth and Conflict Studies

Delivering High-Quality Family Planning Services in Crisis-Affected Settings II: Results

Open access
Curry, Dora Ward, Rattan, Jesse, Huang, Shuyuan, Noznesky, Elizabeth·2015·Global Health: Science and Practice

Abstract

An estimated 43 million women of reproductive age experienced the effects of conflict in 2012. Already vulnerable from the insecurity of the emergency, women must also face the continuing risk of unwanted pregnancy but often are unable to obtain family planning services. The ongoing Supporting Access to Family Planning and Post-Abortion Care (SAFPAC) initiative, led by CARE, has provided contraceptives, including long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), to refugees, internally displaced persons, and conflict-affected resident populations in Chad, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Djibouti, Mali, and Pakistan. The project works through the Ministry of Health in 4 key areas: (1) competency-based training, (2) supply chain management, (3) systematic supervision, and (4) community mobilization to raise awareness and shift norms related to family planning. This article presents data on program results from July 2011 to December 2013 from the 5 countries. Project staff summarized monthly data from client registers using hard-copy forms and recorded the data electronically in Microsoft Excel for compilation and analysis. The initiative reached 52,616 new users of modern contraceptive methods across the 5 countries, ranging from 575 in Djibouti to 21,191 in Chad. LARCs have predominated overall, representing 61% of new modern method users. The percentage of new users choosing LARCs varied by country: 78% in the DRC, 72% in Chad, and 51% in Mali, but only 29% in Pakistan. In Djibouti, those methods were not offered in the country through SAFPAC during the period discussed here. In Chad, the DRC, and Mali, implants have been the most popular LARC method, while in Pakistan the IUD has been more popular. Use of IUDs, however, has comprised a larger share of the method mix over time in all 4 of these countries. These results to date suggest that it is feasible to work with the public sector in fragile, crisis-affected states to deliver a wide range of quality family planning services, to do so rapidly, and to see a dramatic increase in the percentage of users choosing long-acting reversible methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9745/ghsp-d-14-00112

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]National Institute of Population Studies (NIPS) [Pakistan]; ICF International. Pakistan demographic and health survey 2012–13. Islamabad (Pakistan): NIPS; 2012 Co-published by ICF International. Available from http://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-FR290-DHS-Final-Reports.cfm
  2. [12]Jonas E Improving provider performance: an exploration of the literature. MotherCare Matters. 2000; 9(2): 1– 23 Available from: http://www.jsi.com/JSIInternet/Inc/Common/_download_pub.cfm?id = 10510&lid = 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curry, D. W., Rattan, J., Huang, S., & Noznesky, E.
Affiliations
CARE USA (US)
Corresponding author
Curry, Dora Ward
Venue
Global Health: Science and Practice
Published
2015-02-04
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
25-33
ISSN
2169-575X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155157477
Cited by
53
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Global Health Science and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
Keywords
family planning services, conflict-affected settings, long-acting reversible contraception, contraceptive access, refugees, internally displaced persons, post-conflict health, contraceptive choice, contraceptive implants, intrauterine devices, health professions education, supply chain management, community mobilization, care
MeSH terms
Africa, Asia, Western, Contraception, Delivery of Health Care, Developing Countries, Emergencies, Family Planning Services, Female, Humans, Intrauterine Devices, Refugees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review