Temporal effectiveness of interventions to improve medication adherence: a network meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Adherence-enhancing interventions have been assessed in the literature, however heterogeneity and conflicting findings have prohibited a consensus on the most effective approach to maintain adherence over time. With the ageing population and growth of chronic conditions, evaluation of sustainable strategies to improve and maintain medication adherence long term is paramount. We aimed to determine the comparative effectiveness of interventions for improving medication adherence over time among adults with any clinical condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Meta-analyses evaluating interventions to improve medication adherence were searched in PubMed in January 2019 and reviewed for primary studies. Experimental studies with a comparison group assessing an intervention to enhance medication adherence in adult patients with reported adherence outcomes were included. Two authors extracted data for study characteristics, interventions and adherence outcomes. Interventions were categorized into four groups or combinations: educational, attitudinal, technical and rewards. Four network meta-analyses were performed to compare interventions based on patient follow-up time. Medication adherence effect sizes were reported as odds ratios (OR) with a 95% credibility interval (CrI) and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to allow ranking probabilities. Risk of bias was assessed as per Cochrane guidelines. RESULTS: Data was obtained from 69 meta-analyses with 468 primary studies being included in qualitative synthesis. The four networks compromised of 249 studies in total (0-3 month follow-up: 99 studies, 4-6 months: 104, 7-9 months: 18, ≥10 months: 94). Interventions showing success in follow-ups of less than 10 months varied across time. Significant effects compared to standard of care (SOC) were found in technical (4-6 months: OR 0.34, 95% CrI 0.25-0.45) and attitudinal interventions (7-9 months: 0.37, 0.17-0.84). Multicomponent interventions demonstrated effectiveness compared to standard of care with an additive effect displayed, particularly in longer follow-ups (educational + attitudinal + technical interventions ≥10 months: OR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.27-0.88). DISCUSSION: All interventions reviewed improved medication adherence compared to standard of care. Multicomponent interventions displayed the most promising results in maintenance of long-term medication adherence. Technical and reward components enhanced adherence on a short-term basis, while educational and attitudinal interventions evolved over time to be more effective in follow-ups greater than 7 months. Sustainability of adherence to medications over time is dependent upon multicomponent interventions including educational, attitudinal and technical aspects to modify and enhance patient medication-taking behavior. Future research should focus on the most cost-effective approaches able to be integrated into routine practice.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Single-component interventions (categorised as attitudinal, reward, educational, or technical) were most efficacious in the short term (<10 months), whereas multicomponent interventions (strategies consisting of more than 1 category) yielded better long-term medication adherence (≥10 months).
“This is in-line with Wiecek et al.'s (2019) findings, which showed that single-component interventions (categorised as “attitudinal”, “reward”, “educational”, or “technical”) were most efficacious in the short term (<10 months), whereas multicomponent interventions (strategies consisting of more than 1 category) yielded better long-term medication adherence (≥10 months).59”
From Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence
Nieuwlaat, R., Wilczynski, N., Navarro, T., Hobson, N., Jeffery, R., Keepanasseril, A., Agoritsas, T., Mistry, N., Iorio, A., Jack, S., et al. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000011.pub4 · Cited by 2,945 · see citing works
Adherence to Long‐Term Therapies: Evidence for Action
Burkhart, P. V., & Sabaté, E. (2003) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.tb00001.x · Cited by 2,526 · see citing works
Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
Dias, S., Welton, N. J., Caldwell, D. M., & Ades, A. E. (2010) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3767 · Cited by 2,521 · see citing works
A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications
Vrijens, B., De Geest, S., Hughes, D. A., Przemyslaw, K., Demonceau, J., Ruppar, T., Dobbels, F., Fargher, E., Morrison, V., Lewek, P., et al. (2012) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04167.x · Cited by 2,028 · see citing works
Medication Adherence: WHO Cares?
Brown, M. T., & Bussell, J. K. (2011) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0575 · Cited by 1,928 · see citing works
Medication adherence outcomes of 771 intervention trials: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Conn, V. S., & Ruppar, T. M. (2017) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.03.008 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Methods for including information from multi-arm trials in pairwise meta-analysis
Rücker, G., Cates, C. J., & Schwarzer, G. (2017) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1259 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
The next phase in professional services research: From implementation to sustainability
Crespo-Gonzalez, C., Garcia-Cardenas, V., & Benrimoj, S. I. (2017) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.05.020 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationMedication adherence behaviors of Medicare beneficiaries
Carr-Lopez, Shek, A., Lastimosa, J., Patel, R., Woelfel, J., Galal, S., & Gundersen, B. (2014) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s64825 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- [1]Statistics NCfH. Health, United States, 2016: with chartbook on long-term trends in health. 2017. 28910066
- [3]Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to Medication. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005; 353(5): 487– 97. 10.1056/NEJMra050100. 16079372 · DOI · Paper page
- [4]Sokol MC, McGuigan KA, Verbrugge RR, Epstein RS. Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost. Med Care. 2005; 43(6): 521– 30. Epub 2005/05/24.. 15908846
- [6]Kardas P, Lewek P, Matyjaszczyk M. Determinants of patient adherence: a review of systematic reviews. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2013; 4: 91 Epub 2013/07/31. 10.3389/fphar.2013.00091. 23898295 PMC3722478 · DOI · Paper page
- [8]Costa E, Giardini A, Savin M, Menditto E, Lehane E, Laosa O, et al Interventional tools to improve medication adherence: review of literature. Patient preference and adherence. 2015; 9: 1303– 14. Epub 2015/09/24. 10.2147/PPA.S87551. 26396502 PMC4576894 · DOI
- [10]Costa E, Giardini A, Savin M, Menditto E, Lehane E, Laosa O, et al Interventional tools to improve medication adherence: review of literature. Patient preference and adherence. 2015; 9: 1303– 14. 10.2147/PPA.S87551 26396502 PMC4576894 · DOI
- [12]Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL. Compliance in health care: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979.
- [13]Torres-Robles A, Wiecek E, Tonin FS, Benrimoj SI, Fernandez-Llimos F, Garcia-Cardenas V. Comparison of Interventions to Improve Long-Term Medication Adherence Across Different Clinical Conditions: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2018; 9: 1454 Epub 2019/01/09. 10.3389/fphar.2018.01454. 30618748 PMC6311651 · DOI
- [15]Demonceau J, Ruppar T, Kristanto P, Hughes DA, Fargher E, Kardas P, et al Identification and assessment of adherence-enhancing interventions in studies assessing medication adherence through electronically compiled drug dosing histories: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Drugs. 2013; 73(6): 545– 62. 10.1007/s40265-013-0041-3. 23588595 PMC3647098 · DOI
- [16]Blaschke TF, Osterberg L, Vrijens B, Urquhart J. Adherence to medications: insights arising from studies on the unreliable link between prescribed and actual drug dosing histories. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 2012; 52: 275– 301. Epub 2011/09/29. 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011711-113247. 21942628 · DOI
- [17]Cooper V, Moyle GJ, Fisher M, Reilly G, Ewan J, Liu HC, et al Beliefs about antiretroviral therapy, treatment adherence and quality of life in a 48-week randomised study of continuation of zidovudine/lamivudine or switch to tenofovir DF/emtricitabine, each with efavirenz. AIDS care. 2011; 23(6): 705– 13. Epub 2011/04/09. 10.1080/09540121.2010.534433. 21476152 · DOI
- [18]Krousel-Wood M, Joyce C, Holt E, Muntner P, Webber LS, Morisky DE, et al Predictors of decline in medication adherence: Results from CoSMO. Hypertension. 2011; 58(5): 804– 10. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.176859 21968751 PMC3220657 · DOI
- [20]Sapkota S, Brien JA, Greenfield JR, Aslani P. A Systematic Review of Interventions Addressing Adherence to Anti-Diabetic Medications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes—Components of Interventions. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6): e0128581 10.1371/journal.pone.0128581. 26053004 PMC4460122 · DOI
- [21]Demonceau J, Ruppar T, Kristanto P, Hughes DA, Fargher E, Kardas P, et al Identification and assessment of adherence-enhancing interventions in studies assessing medication adherence through electronically compiled drug dosing histories: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Drugs. 2013; 73(6): 545– 62. Epub 2013/04/17. 10.1007/s40265-013-0041-3. 23588595 PMC3647098 · DOI
- [22]Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, Scott DA, Itzler R, Cappelleri JC, et al Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. 2011; 14(4): 429– 37. Epub 2011/06/15. 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.011. 21669367 · DOI
- [23]Tonin FS, Rotta I, Mendes AM, Pontarolo R. Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisons. Pharmacy practice. 2017; 15(1): 943 Epub 2017/05/16. 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.01.943. 28503228 PMC5386629 · DOI
- [24]Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Annals of internal medicine. 2015; 162(11): 777– 84. Epub 2015/06/02. 10.7326/M14-2385. 26030634 · DOI · Paper page
- [25]Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLOS Medicine. 2009; 6(7): e1000100 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 19621070 PMC2707010 · DOI · Paper page
- [27]Tonin FS, Wiecek E, Torres-Robles A, Pontarolo R, Benrimoj SI, Fernandez-Llimos F, et al An innovative and comprehensive technique to evaluate different measures of medication adherence: The network meta-analysis. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.05.010 29801918 · DOI
- [28]Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2011; 343: d5928 Epub 2011/10/20. 10.1136/bmj.d5928. 22008217 PMC3196245 · DOI · Paper page
- [31]Higgins JP, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades AE, White IR. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Research synthesis methods. 2012; 3(2): 98– 110. Epub 2012/06/01. 10.1002/jrsm.1044. 26062084 PMC4433772 · DOI · Paper page
- [32]Mbuagbaw L, Rochwerg B, Jaeschke R, Heels-Andsell D, Alhazzani W, Thabane L, et al Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses. Systematic reviews. 2017; 6(1): 79 10.1186/s13643-017-0473-z. 28403893 PMC5389085 · DOI · Paper page
- [33]van Valkenhoef G, Dias S, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis. Research synthesis methods. 2016; 7(1): 80– 93. 10.1002/jrsm.1167. 26461181 PMC5057346 · DOI
- [34]van Valkenhoef G, Tervonenc T, Zwinkels T, Brock Bd, Hillege H. ADDIS: A decision support system for evidence-based medicine. Decision Support Systems. 2013; 55(2): 459– 75. 10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.005. · DOI
- [35]Webster R, Patel A, Selak V, Billot L, Bots ML, Brown A, et al Effectiveness of fixed dose combination medication ('polypills') compared with usual care in patients with cardiovascular disease or at high risk: A prospective, individual patient data meta-analysis of 3140 patients in six countries. International journal of cardiology. 2016; 205: 147– 56. Epub 2016/01/07. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.12.015. 26736090 · DOI
- [36]Prochaska JJ, Prochaska JO. A Review of Multiple Health Behavior Change Interventions for Primary Prevention. American journal of lifestyle medicine. 2011; 5(3): 10.1177/1559827610391883 24358034 PMC3865280 · DOI
- [37]Zurovac D, Larson BA, Sudoi RK, Snow RW. Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of a Mobile Phone Text-Message Reminder Programmes to Improve Health Workers’ Adherence to Malaria Guidelines in Kenya. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7(12): e52045 10.1371/journal.pone.0052045 23272206 PMC3525566 · DOI · Paper page
- [38]Conner M, Norman P. Health behaviour: Current issues and challenges. Psychology & health. 2017; 32(8): 895– 906. Epub 2017/06/15. 10.1080/08870446.2017.1336240. 28612656 · DOI
- [39]Brehm JW, Self EA. The intensity of motivation. Annual review of psychology. 1989; 40: 109– 31. Epub 1989/01/01. 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545. 2648973 · DOI · Paper page
- [40]Touchette DR, Shapiro NL. Medication Compliance, Adherence, and Persistence: Current Status of Behavioral and Educational Interventions to Improve Outcomes. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 2008; 14(6): S2– S10.
- [43]Ward BW, Schiller JS, Goodman RA. Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: a 2012 update. Preventing chronic disease. 2014; 11: E62 Epub 2014/04/20. 10.5888/pcd11.130389. 24742395 PMC3992293 · DOI
- [47]Wilson K, Senay I, Durantini M, Sánchez F, Hennessy M, Spring B, et al When It Comes to Lifestyle Recommendations, More is Sometimes Less: A Meta-Analysis of Theoretical Assumptions Underlying the Effectiveness of Interventions Promoting Multiple Behavior Domain Change. Psychological bulletin. 2015; 141(2): 474– 509. 25528345 PMC4801324
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Yow, D. K. W., Ang, W. J., Yap, H. J., Ito, S., Liu, J., Ko, J., Tan, D. S.-Y., Lorenzatti, A., & Ang, C.-S. (2025) · eClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103270 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wiecek, E., Tonin, F. S., Torres-Robles, A., Benrimoj, S. I., Fernandez-Llimos, F., & Garcia-Cardenas, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2019-03-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e0213432
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6413898
- OpenAlex
- W2921747913
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- medication adherence, adherence interventions, educational intervention, technical interventions, multicomponent intervention, standard of care comparison, surface under the cumulative ranking curve, risk of bias assessment
- MeSH terms
- Network Meta-Analysis, Assessment of Medication Adherence, Adult, Attitude to Health, Bayes Theorem, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Drug Monitoring, Medication Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review